Prevention of cardiovascular disease in rural Australian primary care: an exploratory study of the perspectives of clinicians and high-risk men
Leigh Kinsman A E , Rachel Tham B , Julie Symons B , Mike Jones C , Stephen Campbell D and Ann Allenby B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham, Tas. 7250, Australia.
B School of Rural Health, Monash University, PO Box 666, Bendigo, Vic. 3552, Australia.
C Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Building C3A, Room 516, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
D Institute of Population Health – Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, 7th Floor, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
E Corresponding author. Email: leigh.kinsman@utas.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 22(6) 510-516 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15091
Submitted: 15 June 2015 Accepted: 15 November 2015 Published: 27 April 2016
Journal Compilation © La Trobe University 2016
Abstract
Rural primary care services have the potential to play a major role in reducing the gap in cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes between rural and metropolitan Australians, particularly in men at high risk of CVD. The aim of this study was to explore the self-reported behaviours and satisfaction with their general practice/practitioner of men at high risk of CVD, and attitudes of rural primary care clinicians regarding the role of primary care in CVD prevention. This observational research was addressed through survey questionnaires with rural men at high risk of CVD and semi-structured interviews with rural primary care clinicians. Fourteen rural primary care practices from towns with populations less than 25 000 participated. One hundred and fifty-eight high-risk men completed the questionnaire. Their responses demonstrated poorly controlled risk factors despite a willingness to change. Alternatively, rural primary care clinicians (n = 20) reported that patients were unlikely to change and that illness-based funding models inhibited cardiovascular preventive activities. Australians living in rural areas have worse CVD outcomes. In addition, there is a disparity in the assumptions of health providers and male patients at high risk of CVD in rural areas. This necessitates innovative rural primary care models that include a blended payment system that incentivises or funds preventive care alongside an emphasis on lifestyle advice, as well as an explicit strategy to influence clinician and patient behaviour to help address the disparity.
Additional keywords: health policy, health services research, primary health care, primary prevention, rural health.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Leading causes of death – overview. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2011) Cardiovascular disease by populations of interest. AIHW, Canberra.
Allenby A, Kinsman L, Tham R, Symons J, Jones MP, Campbell S (2015) The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care. The Australian Journal of Rural Health
| The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26255899PubMed |
Ampt A, Amoroso C, Harris M, McKenzie S, Rose V, Taggart JR (2009) Attitudes, norms and controls influencing lifestyle risk factor management in general practice. BMC Family Practice 10, 1–8.
Campbell S, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M (2003) Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 326, 816–819.
| Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7ntVyjtg%3D%3D&md5=875608961c428b927e15a3302a788af2CAS |
Campbell S, Ludt S, van Lieshout J, Boffin N, Wensing M, Petek D, Grol R, Roland M (2008) Quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease primary care in nine European countries. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 15, 509–515.
| Quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease primary care in nine European countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantolis E, Sibbald B, Roland M (2009) Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. The New England Journal of Medicine 361, 368–378.
| Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXovFCrtr0%3D&md5=c99557cb5120ab8ce22a339d1b420297CAS | 19625717PubMed |
ClinRisk Ltd (2014). QRISK®2-2014 cardiovascular disease risk calculator. Available at http://www.qrisk.org/ [Verified 3 December 2014]
Davy Z, Middlemass J, Siriwardena AN (2013) Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of the primary care management of insomnia: qualitative study. Health Expectations 18, 1371–1383.
| Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of the primary care management of insomnia: qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23952603PubMed |
Dye J, Schatz I, Rosenberg B, Coleman S (2000) Constant comparison method: a kaleidoscope of data The Qualitative Report 4,
Elley CR, Kerse NM, Arroll B (2003) Why target sedentary adults in primary health care? Baseline results from the Waikato Heart, Health, and Activity Study. Preventive Medicine 37, 342–348.
| Why target sedentary adults in primary health care? Baseline results from the Waikato Heart, Health, and Activity Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14507491PubMed |
Goodyear-Smith F, Gauld R, Cumming J, O’Keefe B, Pert H, McCormack P (2012) International learning on increasing the value and effectiveness of primary care (I LIVE PC) New Zealand. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 25, S39–S44.
| International learning on increasing the value and effectiveness of primary care (I LIVE PC) New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22403250PubMed |
Harris M, Hobbs C, Powell Davies G, Simpson S, Bernard D, Stubbs A (2005) Implementation of a SNAP intervention in two divisions of general practice: a feasibility study. The Medical Journal of Australia 183, S54–S58.
Huang N, Daddo M, Clune E (2009) CHD management gaps in general practice. Australian Family Physician 38, 241–245.
Kantarevic J, Kralj B (2013) Link between pay for performance incentives and physician payment mechanisms: evidence from the diabetes management incentive in Ontario. Health Economics 22, 1417–1439.
| Link between pay for performance incentives and physician payment mechanisms: evidence from the diabetes management incentive in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23203722PubMed |
Keeley RD, West DR, Tutt B, Nutting PA (2014) A qualitative comparison of primary care clinicians’ and their patients’ perspectives on achieving depression care: implications for improving outcomes. BMC Family Practice 15, 13
| A qualitative comparison of primary care clinicians’ and their patients’ perspectives on achieving depression care: implications for improving outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24428952PubMed |
Kinsman L, Rotter T, Willis J, Snow P, Buykx P, Humphreys J (2012) Do clinical pathways enhance access to evidence-based acute myocardial infarction treatment in rural emergency departments? The Australian Journal of Rural Health 20, 59–66.
| Do clinical pathways enhance access to evidence-based acute myocardial infarction treatment in rural emergency departments?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22435765PubMed |
Lewis D, Robinson J, Wilkinson E (2003) Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians’ and lay people’s attitudes. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 327, 841
| Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians’ and lay people’s attitudes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ludt S, Petek D, Laux G, van Lieshout J, Campbell S, Kanzi B, Glehr M, Wensing M (2012) Recording of risk-factors and lifestyle counselling in patients at high risk for cardiovascular diseases in European primary care. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 19, 258–266.
| Recording of risk-factors and lifestyle counselling in patients at high risk for cardiovascular diseases in European primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21450582PubMed |
Mosca L, Linfante A, Benjamin E, Berra K, Hayes S, Walsh B, Fabunmi B, Kwan J, Mills T, Simpson S (2005) National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Circulation 111, 499–510.
| National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15687140PubMed |
National Heart Foundation of Australia (2010). Improving cardiovascular health outcomes in Australian general practice. National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne.
Neuman W (1997) ‘Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction.’ (Sage: London)
National Institutes of Health (2014) Risk assessment tool for estimating your 10-year risk of having a heart attack. Available at http://cvdrisk.nhlbi.nih.gov/ [Verified 3 December 2014]
National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance (2014). Australian absolute cardiovascular disease risk calculator. Available at http://www.cvdcheck.org.au [Verified 3 December 2014]
Passey M, Fanaian M, Lyle D, Harris M (2010) Assessment and management of lifestyle risk factors in rural and urban general practices in Australia. Australian Journal of Primary Health 16, 81–86.
| Assessment and management of lifestyle risk factors in rural and urban general practices in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21133303PubMed |
Roland M, Campbell S (2014) Successes and failure of pay for performance in the United Kingdom. The New England Journal of Medicine 370, 1944–1949.
| Successes and failure of pay for performance in the United Kingdom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsVGksbbO&md5=ec0225a1e0eda08160b41b0c26e6ed58CAS | 24827040PubMed |
Strauss A, Corbin J (1990). ‘Basics of qualitative research.’ (Sage: Chicago)
Wensing M, Ludt S, Campbell S, van Lieshout J, Volbracht E, Grol R (2009) European Practice Assessment of Cardiovascular risk management (EPA Cardio): protocol of an international observational study in primary care. Implementation Science 4, 3
| European Practice Assessment of Cardiovascular risk management (EPA Cardio): protocol of an international observational study in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19128457PubMed |
Wilson P, D’Agostino R, Levy D, Belanger A, Silbershatz H, Kannel W (1998) Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 97, 1837–1847.
| Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3msVOjsA%3D%3D&md5=81b63427a5cd0272d5c2b903958de379CAS | 9603539PubMed |
Wittchen HU, Glaesmer H, Marz W, Stalla G, Lehnert H, Zeiher AM, Silber S, Koch U, Bohler S, Pittrow D, Ruf G, DETECT-Study Group (2005) Cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: methods and baseline prevalence rates – the DETECT program. Current Medical Research and Opinion 21, 619–629.
| Cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: methods and baseline prevalence rates – the DETECT program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15899112PubMed |
Wranik D, Drurier-Copp M (2010) Physician remuneration methods for family physicians in Canada: expected outcomes and lessons learned. Health Care Analysis 18, 35–59.
| Physician remuneration methods for family physicians in Canada: expected outcomes and lessons learned.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19172400PubMed |
Wranik D, Drurier-Copp M (2011) Framework for the design of physician remuneration methods in primary care. Social Work in Public Health 26, 231–259.
| Framework for the design of physician remuneration methods in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21534123PubMed |
Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L, INTERHEART Study Investigators (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364, 937–952.
| Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15364185PubMed |
