Walking for fitness: is it enough to maintain both heart and bone health?
G. Waddington A E , T. Dickson B , S. Trathen C and R. Adams DA Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Faculty of Business and Government, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
D Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: gordon.waddington@canberra.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 17(1) 86-88 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY10035
Submitted: 30 July 2010 Accepted: 22 November 2010 Published: 16 March 2011
Abstract
Exercising at levels of whole body accelerations exceeding 3.6 g has been shown to have positive effects on cardiovascular fitness, bone density and balance. This pilot research project evaluated the whole body accelerations and cardiovascular challenge provided by selected walks in the Canberra region of Australia to determine if walks could be ranked according to potential level of impact on both cardiovascular fitness and bone health. Nine participants, who described themselves as walking at least 3 km, three times per week, wore a data logging device recording heart rate, acceleration and GPS position while walking three outdoor tracks: (1) the running track of an athletics stadium; (2) on a hill climb path through bushland; and (3) on a route through suburban streets. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) for heart rate, distribution of whole body accelerations and average walking speed between track 2 and tracks 1 and 3. There was a significant difference for heart rate, distribution of whole body accelerations and average walking speed between the walks. The running track and the suburban walk provide a moderate exercise challenge, with the hill climb walk providing progressively greater vertical height challenge, resulting in an increased cardiovascular exercise challenge. No participant effectively exceeded the threshold for achieving a positive impact on bone density (100 or more accelerations/day >3.6 g) on track 1, and only two of the nine participants intermittently achieved this threshold on tracks 2 and 3.
Additional keywords: accelerations, cardiovascular fitness.
References
Astrand P-O, Rodahl K, Dahl H, Stromme S (2003) ‘Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise.’ 4th edn. (Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL)Collins JJ, Whittle MW (1989) Impulsive forces during walking and their clinical implications. Clinical Biomechanics 4, 179–187.
| Impulsive forces during walking and their clinical implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greendale GA, Barret-Connor E, Edelstein S, Ingles S, Haile R (1995) Lifetime leisure exercise and osteoporosis. The Rancho Bernardo Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 141, 951–959.
Gregg EW, Pereira MA, Caspersen CJ (2000) Physical activity, falls, and fractures among older adults: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48, 883–893.
Heikkinen R, Vihriälä E, Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Jämsä T (2007) Acceleration slope of exercise-induced impacts is a determinant of changes in bone density. Journal of Biomechanics 40, 2967–2974.
| Acceleration slope of exercise-induced impacts is a determinant of changes in bone density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17399725PubMed |
Jämsä T, Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Vihriälä E, Leppäluoto J (2006) Effect of daily physical activity on proximal femur. ClinicalBiomechanics 21, 1–7.
| Effect of daily physical activity on proximal femur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB (2008) Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait & Posture 28, 1–15.
| Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kavanagh JJ, Morrison S, James D, Barrett RS (2006) Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system. Journal of Biomechanics 39, 2863–2872.
| Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16253263PubMed |
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention Diagnosis and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention diagnosis and therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association 285, 785–795.
| Osteoporosis prevention diagnosis and therapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11176917PubMed |
Robergs R, Landwehr R (2002) The surprising history of the ‘HRmax =220 – age’ equation. Journal of Exercise Physiology 5, 1–10.
Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Vihriälä E, Rinta-Paavola A, Leppäluoto J, Jämsä T (2006) Intensity of exercise is associated with bone density change in premenopausal women. Osteoporosis International 17, 455–463.
| Intensity of exercise is associated with bone density change in premenopausal women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16404492PubMed |
Vainionpää A, Korpelainen R, Sievanen H, Vihriälä E, Leppäluoto J, Jämsä T (2007) Effect of impact exercise and its intensity on bone geometry at weight-bearing tibia and femur. Bone 40, 604–611.
| Effect of impact exercise and its intensity on bone geometry at weight-bearing tibia and femur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17140871PubMed |
Wallace BA, Cumming RG (2000) Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcified Tissue International 67, 10–18.
| Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXltlGlsrc%3D&md5=b2858e7598523013ba70fe90b905c64fCAS | 10908406PubMed |
