Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: the international collaboration trilemma in interdisciplinary research

Minh-Hoang Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7520-3844 A B * and Quan-Hoang Vuong B *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Graduate School of Asia Pacific Studies, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu, Oita 874-8577, Japan.

B Centre for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia Ward, Ha Dong District, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam.


Handling Editor: Mike Calver

Pacific Conservation Biology 28(6) 517-531 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21026
Submitted: 17 April 2021  Accepted: 21 November 2021   Published: 14 December 2021

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Tourism plays a critical role in biodiversity conservation with at least 12 of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets being directly or indirectly related to tourism.

Aims: As Target 19 aims to raise the generation, transfer and application of knowledge on biodiversity, the objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Aichi Biodiversity Targets on the interdisciplinary research output, quality, and collaboration at the national scale regarding biodiversity and tourism.

Methods: The Hamiltonian Markov Chain Monter Carlo technique, incorporating the bibliometric analysis, was performed on 1176 documents extracted from the Web of Science database.

Key results: The current investigation revealed two prominent findings. First, the Aichi Biodiversity Targets positively affected scientific productivity, quality and international collaboration at the national level. Still, more than half of the countries on Earth (53.41%) had not acquired any interdisciplinary publication on the topic of biodiversity and tourism. Second, international collaboration was found to be an effective measure to improve scientific quality and quantity in both periods before and after the Aichi Targets. Although the impact of international collaboration on scientific output was similar between the two periods, its impact on scientific quality during 2011–2020 was lower than during 1991–2010.

Conclusions: Thus, we argue that international cooperation cannot be used as a ‘silver bullet’ strategy for advancing knowledge in the interdisciplinary field between biodiversity and tourism due to the trilemma between quantity, quality and cost.

Implications: We recommend policymakers, funding evaluators and researchers put culture into perspective to lessen the cost of interdisciplinary research.

Keywords: biodiversity conservation, Bayesian analysis, culture, developing countries, Latin America and the Caribbean, mindsponge, protected areas, scientific productivity, scientific quality, Target 19, tourism.


References

Ahrends, A, Burgess, ND, Gereau, RE, Marchant, R, Bulling, MT, Lovett, JC, Platts, PJ, Wilkins Kindemba, V, Owen, N, Fanning, E, and Rahbek, C (2011). Funding begets biodiversity. Diversity Distributions 17, 191–200.
Funding begets biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Akindele, EO, Ekwemuka, MC, Apeverga, P, Amusa, TO, Olajuyigbe, S, Coker, OM, Olaleru, F, Fasona, M, Usen, EN, and Ringim, AS (2021). Assessing awareness on biodiversity conservation among Nigerians: the Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 1947–1970.
Assessing awareness on biodiversity conservation among Nigerians: the Aichi Biodiversity Target 1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Aria, M, and Cuccurullo, C (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11, 959–975.
Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Balmford, A, Beresford, J, Green, J, Naidoo, R, Walpole, M, and Manica, A (2009). A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology , e1000144.
A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Balmford, A, Green, JMH, Anderson, M, Beresford, J, Huang, C, Naidoo, R, Walpole, M, and Manica, A (2015). Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biology 13, e1002074.
Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25710450PubMed |

Baral, N, Stern, MJ, and Bhattarai, R (2008). Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics 66, 218–227.
Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borrelle, SB, Koch, JB, McDonough Mackenzie, C, Ingeman, KE, McGill, BM, Lambert, MR, Belasen, AM, Dudney, J, Chang, CH, Teffer, AK, and Wu, GC (2020). What does it mean to be for a Place. Pacific Conservation Biology 27, 354–361.
What does it mean to be for a Place.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bovarnick A, Fernandez-Baca J, Galindo J, Negret H (2010) ‘Financial sustainability of protected areas in Latin America and the Caribbean: investment policy guidance.’ (United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC)). Available at https://www.undp.org/publications/financial-sustainability-protected-areas-latin-america-an-caribbean. [Accessed 28 October 2020]

Bromham, L, Dinnage, R, and Hua, X (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature 534, 684–687.
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27357795PubMed |

Bruner, AG, Gullison, RE, Rice, RE, and da Fonseca, GAB (2001). Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291, 125–128.
Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11141563PubMed |

Buchanan, GM, Butchart, SHM, Chandler, G, and Gregory, RD (2020). Assessment of national-level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ecological Indicators 116, 106497.
Assessment of national-level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buckley R (2004) ‘Environmental impacts of ecotourism.’ (CABI Publishing: Cambridge, MA)

Buckley, R (2012). Tourism, conservation and the Aichi targets. PARKS 18, 12–19.
Tourism, conservation and the Aichi targets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carr, H, Abas, M, Boutahar, L, Caretti, ON, Chan, WY, Chapman, ASA, de Mendonça, SN, Engleman, A, Ferrario, F, Simmons, KR, Verdura, J, and Zivian, A (2020). The Aichi Biodiversity Targets: achievements for marine conservation and priorities beyond 2020. PeerJ 8, e9743.
The Aichi Biodiversity Targets: achievements for marine conservation and priorities beyond 2020.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33391861PubMed |

CBD High-Level Panel (2014) Resourcing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: an assessment of benefits, investments and resource needs for implementing the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. Second Report of the High-Level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.

Convention on Biological Diversity (2006) Article 2. Use of terms. Available at https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/?a=cbd-02. [Accessed 28 October 2020]

Convention on Biological Diversity (2018a) Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Available at https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/. [Accessed 10 July 2020]

Convention on Biological Diversity (2018b) ‘Decision adopted by the conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity’. (United Nations: Sharm-El-Sheikh, Egypt)

Dangles, O, Loirat, J, Freour, C, Serre, S, Vacher, J, and Le Roux, X (2016). Research on biodiversity and climate change at a distance: collaboration networks between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean. PLoS ONE 11, e0157441.
Research on biodiversity and climate change at a distance: collaboration networks between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27304924PubMed |

Dharmaratne, GS, Yee Sang, F, and Walling, LJ (2000). Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Annals of Tourism Research 27, 590–610.
Tourism potentials for financing protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dudley N, Shadie P, Stolton S (2013) ‘Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types.’ Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland)

Editorial (2017). Promoting reproducibility with registered reports. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 0034.
Promoting reproducibility with registered reports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Emerton L, Bishop J, Thomas L (2006) ‘Sustainable financing of protected areas: a global review of challenges and options.’ (IUCN)

Ferraro, PJ, and Hanauer, MM (2011). Protecting ecosystems and alleviating poverty with parks and reserves:‘win-win’or tradeoffs? Environmental and Resource Economics 48, 269–286.
Protecting ecosystems and alleviating poverty with parks and reserves:‘win-win’or tradeoffs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fonseca, Bd, Sampaio, RB, de Araújo Fonseca, MV, and Zicker, F (2016). Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Research Policy and Systems 14, 34.
Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gadgil, M, Berkes, F, and Folke, C (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. AMBIO 22, 151–156.

Gill J (2014) ‘Bayesian methods: a social and behavioral sciences approach.’ (CRC Press)

Gössling, S (2002). Global environmental consequences of tourism. Global Environmental Change 12, 283–302.
Global environmental consequences of tourism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gössling S, Hall MC (2006) ‘Tourism and global environmental change.’ (Taylor & Francis)

Hall, CM (2010). Changing paradigms and global change: from sustainable to steady-state tourism. Tourism Recreation Research 35, 131–143.
Changing paradigms and global change: from sustainable to steady-state tourism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall, CM (2010). Tourism and biodiversity: more significant than climate change? Journal of Heritage Tourism 5, 253–266.
Tourism and biodiversity: more significant than climate change?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall CM (2019) Biological invasion, biosecurity, tourism, and globalisation. In ‘Handbook of globalisation and tourism’. (Ed. DJ Timothy) pp. 114–125. (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK)

Halsey, LG, Curran-Everett, D, Vowler, SL, and Drummond, GB (2015). The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nature Methods 12, 179–185.
The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25719825PubMed |

Harrison, LE (2000). Culture matters. The National Interest 60, 55–65.

Hvenegaard, GT, Halpenny, EA, and Mccool, SF (2012). Protected area tourism and the Aichi Targets. PARKS 18, 7–12.
Protected area tourism and the Aichi Targets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2019) Nature’s dangerous decline ‘unprecedented’ species extinction rates ‘accelerating’. (The United Nations: Geneva) Available at https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/press-release/natures-dangerous-decline-unprecedented-species-extinction-rates. [Accessed 24 June 2020]

IUCN (2020) About protected areas. Available at https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about. [Accessed 24 June 2020]

Jager, E, and Halpenny, EA (2012). Supporting the CBD Aichi biodiversity conservation targets through park tourism: a case study of Parks Canada’s visitor experience programme. PARKS 18, 79.
Supporting the CBD Aichi biodiversity conservation targets through park tourism: a case study of Parks Canada’s visitor experience programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

La V-P, Vuong Q-H (2019) bayesvl: visually learning the graphical structure of Bayesian networks and performing MCMC with ‘Stan’. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bayesvl/index.html.

Leihy, RI, Coetzee, BWT, Morgan, F, Raymond, B, Shaw, JD, Terauds, A, Bastmeijer, K, and Chown, SL (2020). Antarctica’s wilderness fails to capture continent’s biodiversity. Nature 583, 567–571.
Antarctica’s wilderness fails to capture continent’s biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32669711PubMed |

Lenzen, M, Sun, Y-Y, Faturay, F, Ting, Y-P, Geschke, A, and Malik, A (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change 8, 522–528.
The carbon footprint of global tourism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lubchenco, J, Palumbi, SR, Gaines, SD, and Andelman, S (2003). Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13, 3–7.
Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Luo, Q, Song, Y, Hu, X, Zhu, S, Wang, H, and Ji, H (2018). Effects of tourism disturbance on habitat quality and population size of the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus. Wildlife Research 45, 411–420.
Effects of tourism disturbance on habitat quality and population size of the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mallari, NAD, Collar, NJ, McGowan, PJK, and Marsden, SJ (2016). Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11. Ambio 45, 313–322.
Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mansourian S, Dudley N (2008) ‘Public funds to protected areas’. (WWF International: Gland, Switzerland)

Marchese, C (2015). Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecology Conservation 3, 297–309.
Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McElreath R (2018) ‘Statistical rethinking: a Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan’, (Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, New York)

Moore, SA, Newsome, D, Rodger, K, and Smith, AJ (2009). Interdisciplinary ecotourism research: insights and issues for conservation biology. The Open Conservation Biology Journal 3, 57–64.
Interdisciplinary ecotourism research: insights and issues for conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB, and Kent, J (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10706275PubMed |

Naughton-Treves, L, Holland, MB, and Brandon, K (2005). The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 219–252.
The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, D, and Hughes, M (2018). The contemporary conservation reserve visitor phenomenon!. Biodiversity and Conservation 27, 521–529.
The contemporary conservation reserve visitor phenomenon!.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK (2012) ‘Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management.’ (Channel View: Bristol)

Nguyen, M-H, Ho, M-T, La, V-P, Nguyen, Q-YT, Ho, M-T, Vuong, T-T, Le, T-T, Nguyen, M-C, and Vuong, Q-H (2020). A scientometric study on depression among university students in East Asia: research and system insufficiencies? Sustainability 12, 1498.
A scientometric study on depression among university students in East Asia: research and system insufficiencies?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Okamura, K (2019). Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism. Palgrave Communications 5, 1–9.
Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pauly, MV (2011). The trade-off among quality, quantity, and cost: how to make it—if we must. Health Affairs 30, 574–580.
The trade-off among quality, quantity, and cost: how to make it—if we must.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21471475PubMed |

Phillips, A (2004). The history of the international system of protected area management categories. Parks 14, 4–14.

Pongsiri, MJ, and Roman, J (2007). Examining the links between biodiversity and human health: an interdisciplinary research initiative at the US Environmental Protection Agency. EcoHealth 4, 82–85.
Examining the links between biodiversity and human health: an interdisciplinary research initiative at the US Environmental Protection Agency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Postel, SL, and Thompson, BH (2005). Watershed protection: capturing the benefits of nature’s water supply services. Natural Resources Forum 29, 98–108.
Watershed protection: capturing the benefits of nature’s water supply services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reyes-Gonzalez, L, Gonzalez-Brambila, CN, and Veloso, F (2016). Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance. Scientometrics 108, 1171–1191.
Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sahel, J-A (2011). Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Science Translational Medicine 3, 84cm13–84cm13.
Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21613620PubMed |

Schulze, K, Knights, K, Coad, L, Geldmann, J, Leverington, F, Eassom, A, Marr, M, Butchart, SHM, Hockings, M, and Burgess, ND (2018). An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Letters 11, e12435.
An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2015) ‘Tourism supporting biodiversity - a manual on applying the CBD Guidelines on Biodiversity and Tourism Development.’ (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal)

Shah, H (2020). Global problems need social science. Nature 577, 295–295.
Global problems need social science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31942060PubMed |

Sheehan, EV, Stevens, TF, Gall, SC, Cousens, SL, and Attrill, MJ (2013). Recovery of a temperate reef assemblage in a marine protected area following the exclusion of towed demersal fishing. PloS ONE 8, e83883.
Recovery of a temperate reef assemblage in a marine protected area following the exclusion of towed demersal fishing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24391841PubMed |

Sievanen, L, Campbell, LM, and Leslie, HM (2012). Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology 26, 315–323.
Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22260376PubMed |

Soares-Filho, B, Moutinho, P, Nepstad, D, Anderson, A, Rodrigues, H, Garcia, R, Dietzsch, L, Merry, F, Bowman, M, Hissa, L, Silvestrini, R, and Maretti, C (2010). Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 10821–10826.
Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Straughan, E, and Dixon, D (2012). Cultural response to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2, 480–481.
Cultural response to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, MFJ, Sattler, PS, Evans, M, Fuller, RA, Watson, JEM, and Possingham, HP (2011). What works for threatened species recovery? An empirical evaluation for Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 20, 767–777.
What works for threatened species recovery? An empirical evaluation for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thur, SM (2010). User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: an application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Marine Policy 34, 63–69.
User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: an application to the Bonaire National Marine Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tydecks, L, Jeschke, JM, Wolf, M, Singer, G, and Tockner, K (2018). Spatial and topical imbalances in biodiversity research. PloS ONE 13, e0199327.
Spatial and topical imbalances in biodiversity research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29975719PubMed |

Victor, D (2015). Climate change: embed the social sciences in climate policy. Nature 520, 27–29.
Climate change: embed the social sciences in climate policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25832390PubMed |

Visseren-Hamakers, IJ, Gupta, A, Herold, M, Peña-Claros, M, and Vijge, MJ (2012). Will REDD+ work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4, 590–596.
Will REDD+ work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, Q-H (2018). The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies. Nature Human Behaviour 2, 5.
The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30980055PubMed |

Vuong, Q-H (2019). Breaking barriers in publishing demands a proactive attitude. Nature Human Behaviour 3, 1034–1034.
Breaking barriers in publishing demands a proactive attitude.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31602012PubMed |

Vuong, Q-H (2020). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature 582, 149.
Reform retractions to make them more transparent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, Q-H (2021a). The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange. Economics and Business Letters 10, 284–290.
The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong Q-H (2021b) Western monopoly of climate science is creating an eco-deficit culture. Economy, Land, & Climate Insight. Available at https://elc-insight.org/western-monopoly-of-climate-science-is-creating-an-eco-deficit-culture/. [Assessed 2 December 2021]

Vuong, Q-H, Bui, Q-K, La, V-P, Vuong, T-T, Nguyen, V-HT, Ho, M-T, Nguyen, H-KT, and Ho, M-T (2018). Cultural additivity: behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales. Palgrave Communications 4, 143.
Cultural additivity: behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, Q-H, Ho, M-T, Nguyen, H-KT, Vuong, T-T, Tran, T, Hoang, K-L, Vu, T-H, Hoang, P-H, Nguyen, M-H, Ho, M-T, and La, V-P (2020). On how religions could accidentally incite lies and violence: folktales as a cultural transmitter. Palgrave Communications 6, 82.
On how religions could accidentally incite lies and violence: folktales as a cultural transmitter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, Q-H, La, V-P, Nguyen, M-H, Ho, M-T, Ho, M-T, and Mantello, P (2020). Improving Bayesian statistics understanding in the age of Big Data with the bayesvl R package. Software Impacts 4, 100016.
Improving Bayesian statistics understanding in the age of Big Data with the bayesvl R package.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, Q-H, La, V-P, Nguyen, M-H, Ho, M-T, Tran, T, and Ho, M-T (2020). Bayesian analysis for social data: a step-by-step protocol and interpretation. MethodsX 7, 100924.
Bayesian analysis for social data: a step-by-step protocol and interpretation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32489911PubMed |

Vuong, Q-H, and Napier, NK (2015). Acculturation and global mindsponge: an emerging market perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 49, 354–367.
Acculturation and global mindsponge: an emerging market perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vuong, QH, Ho, MT, and La, VP (2019). ‘Stargazing’ and p-hacking behaviours in social sciences: some insights from a developing country. European Science Editing 45, 54–55.

Walpole, MJ, and Goodwin, HJ (2001). Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation 28, 160–166.
Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, JEM, Dudley, N, Segan, DB, and Hockings, M (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73.
The performance and potential of protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

World Bank Group (2012) Biodiversity: finding the funds to keep Latin America green. (World Bank). Available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/10/17/america-latina-biodiversidad-conservacion [Accessed 29 October 2020]

Zafra-Calvo, N, Garmendia, E, Pascual, U, Palomo, I, Gross-Camp, N, Brockington, D, Cortes-Vazquez, J-A, Coolsaet, B, and Burgess, ND (2019). Progress toward equitably managed protected areas in Aichi target 11: a global survey. BioScience 69, 191–197.
Progress toward equitably managed protected areas in Aichi target 11: a global survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30914829PubMed |

Zhang, N, Ren, R, Zhang, Q, and Zhang, T (2020). Air pollution and tourism development: an interplay. Annals of Tourism Research 85, 103032.
Air pollution and tourism development: an interplay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |