Animal detections increase by using a wide-angle camera trap model but not by periodically repositioning camera traps within study sites
Anke Seidlitz
A E , Kate A. Bryant A B , Nicola J. Armstrong C and Adrian F. Wayne D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
B Centre for Climate-Impacted Terrestrial Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
C Mathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
D Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 2, Manjimup, WA 6258, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: anke.seidlitz@gmx.net
Pacific Conservation Biology 28(1) 25-35 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC20076
Submitted: 30 September 2020 Accepted: 25 January 2021 Published: 25 February 2021
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2022 Open Access CC BY
Abstract
When using camera traps for wildlife studies, determining suitable camera models and deployment methods is essential for achieving study objectives. We aimed to determine if camera trap performance can be increased by (1) using cameras with wider detection angles, and (2) by periodically repositioning cameras within sites. We compared three camera trap groups: stationary Reconyx PC900/HC600 (40° detection angle), and paired, periodically-repositioned Reconyx PC900/HC600 and Swift 3C wide-angle camera traps (110° detection angle). Cameras operated simultaneously at 17 sites over 9 weeks within the Upper Warren region, Western Australia. Swift cameras had significantly higher detection rates, leading to better performance, especially for species <1 kg and >10 kg bodyweight. Reconyx cameras missed 54% of known events, with most being animals that moved within the cameras’ detection zones. Stationary and periodically-repositioned Reconyx camera traps performed similarly, although there were notable differences for some species. The better performance of Swift 3C wide-angle camera traps makes them more useful for community-level and species-level studies. The increased sensitivity of the Swift’s passive infrared sensor along with the wider detection zone played an important role in its success. When choosing camera trap models, detection angle and sensor sensitivity should be considered to produce reliable study results. Periodically repositioning cameras within sites is a technique that warrants further investigation as it may reduce camera placement bias, animal avoidance of camera traps, and increase spatial/habitat information when a limited number of cameras are deployed.
Keywords: Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi, camera trapping, comparative study, Dasyurus geoffroii, detection rates, endangered, Myrmecobius fasciatus, passive infrared sensor sensitivity, Pseudocheirus occidentalis, wide angle.
References
Barraquand, F., and Benhamou, S. (2008). Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: Identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. Ecology 89, 3336–3348.| Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: Identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19137941PubMed |
Burrows, N. D., and Christensen, P. E. S. (2002). Long-term trends in native mammal capture rates in a jarrah forest in south-western Australia. Australian Forestry 65, 211–219.
| Long-term trends in native mammal capture rates in a jarrah forest in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burton, A. C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J. T., Bayne, E., and Boutin, S. (2015). Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 675–685.
| Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Damm, P. E., Grand, J. B., and Barnett, S. W. (2010). Variation in detection among passive infrared triggered-cameras used in wildlife research. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 64, 125–130.
Evans, B. E., Mosby, C. E., and Mortelliti, A. (2019). Assessing arrays of multiple trail cameras to detect North American mammals. PLoS One 14, e0217543.
| Assessing arrays of multiple trail cameras to detect North American mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31206527PubMed |
Falzon, G., Lawson, C., Cheung, K.-W., Vernes, K., Ballard, G. A., Fleming, P. J. S., Glen, A. S., Milne, H., Mather-Zardain, A., and Meek, P. D. (2020). ClassifyMe: A Field-Scouting Software for the Identification of Wildlife in Camera Trap Images. Animals 10, 58.
| ClassifyMe: A Field-Scouting Software for the Identification of Wildlife in Camera Trap Images.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fancourt, B. A., Sweaney, M., and Fletcher, D. B. (2018). More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections. Australian Mammalogy 40, 118–121.
| More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gomez Villa, A., Salazar, A., and Vargas, F. (2017). Towards automatic wild animal monitoring: Identification of animal species in camera-trap images using very deep convolutional neural networks. Ecological Informatics 41, 24–32.
| Towards automatic wild animal monitoring: Identification of animal species in camera-trap images using very deep convolutional neural networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gordon M., and Lumley T. (2019 ). ‘Forestplot: Advanced Forest Plot Using ‘grid’ Graphics, R package’. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=forestplot [accessed 15 July 2020].
Gracanin, A., Gracanin, V., and Mikac, K. M. (2019). The selfie trap: A novel camera trap design for accurate small mammal identification. Ecological Management & Restoration 20, 156–158.
| The selfie trap: A novel camera trap design for accurate small mammal identification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gray, E. L., Dennis, T. E., and Baker, A. M. (2017). Can remote infrared cameras be used to differentiate small, sympatric mammal species? A case study of the black-tailed dusky antechinus, Antechinus arktos and co-occurring small mammals in southeast Queensland, Australia. PLoS One 12, e0181592.
| Can remote infrared cameras be used to differentiate small, sympatric mammal species? A case study of the black-tailed dusky antechinus, Antechinus arktos and co-occurring small mammals in southeast Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28792958PubMed |
Heiniger, J., and Gillespie, G. (2018). High variation in camera trap-model sensitivity for surveying mammal species in northern Australia. Wildlife Research 45, 578–585.
| High variation in camera trap-model sensitivity for surveying mammal species in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hofmeester, T. R., Cromsigt, J. P. G. M., Odden, J., Andrén, H., Kindberg, J., and Linnell, J. D. C. (2019). Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi-species comparison. Ecology and Evolution 9, 2320–2336.
| Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi-species comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30847112PubMed |
Jacobs, C. E., and Ausband, D. E. (2018). An evaluation of camera trap performance – What are we missing and does deployment height matter? Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 4, 352–360.
| An evaluation of camera trap performance – What are we missing and does deployment height matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kolowski, J. M., and Forrester, T. D. (2017). Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features. PLoS One 12, e0186679.
| Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29045478PubMed |
Larrucea, E. S., Brussard, P. F., Jaeger, M. M., and Barrett, R. H. (2007). Cameras, coyotes, and the assumption of equal detectability. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1682–1689.
| Cameras, coyotes, and the assumption of equal detectability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie D., and Hines J. (2018 ). ‘RPresence: R Interface for Program PRESENCE’. Available at https://www.usgs.gov/software/presence [accessed 05 April 2019].
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2018). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ 2nd edn. (Academic Press: London.)
Meek, P. D., and Vernes, K. (2016). Can camera trapping be used to accurately survey and monitor the Hastings River mouse (Pseudomys oralis)? Australian Mammalogy 38, 44–51.
| Can camera trapping be used to accurately survey and monitor the Hastings River mouse (Pseudomys oralis)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G., and Fleming, P. (2012). ‘An Introduction to Camera Trapping for Wildlife Surveys in Australia. PestSmart Toolkit.’ (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra, Australia.)
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G.-A., Vernes, K., and Fleming, P. J. S. (2015). The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 1–12.
| The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P., Ballard, G., Fleming, P., and Falzon, G. (2016). Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies. Ecology and Evolution 6, 3216–3225.
| Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27096080PubMed |
Moore, H. A., Valentine, L. E., Dunlop, J. A., and Nimmo, D. G. (2020). The effect of camera orientation on the detectability of wildlife: a case study from north-western Australia. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 6, 546–555.
| The effect of camera orientation on the detectability of wildlife: a case study from north-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
| Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10706275PubMed |
Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., Minchin P. R., O’Hara R. B., Simpson G. L., Solymos P., Stevens M. H. H., Szoecs E., and Wagner H. (2019 ). ‘Vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package’. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan [accessed 20 December 2019].
O’Connor, K. M., Nathan, L. R., Liberati, M. R., Tingley, M. W., Vokoun, J. C., and Rittenhouse, T. A. G. (2017). Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. PLoS One 12, e0175684.
| Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28422973PubMed |
R Core Team (2018). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing’. (R foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.r-project.org [accessed 20 December 2019].
Rowcliffe, J. M., and Carbone, C. (2008). Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future? Animal Conservation 11, 185–186.
| Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rowcliffe, J. M., Carbone, C., Jansen, P. A., Kays, R., and Kranstauber, B. (2011). Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 464–476.
| Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seidlitz, A., Bryant, K. A., Armstrong, N. J., Calver, M., and Wayne, A. F. (2020). Optimising camera trap height and model increases detection and individual identification rates for a small mammal, the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). Australian Mammalogy , .
| Optimising camera trap height and model increases detection and individual identification rates for a small mammal, the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swan, M., Di Stefano, J., and Christie, F. (2014a). Comparing the effectiveness of two types of camera trap for surveying ground-dwelling mammals. In ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research’. (Eds P. Meek, P. Fleming, G. Ballard, P. Banks, A. Claridge, J. Sanderson, and D. Swann.) pp. 166–175. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Swan, M., Di Stefano, J., Christie, F., Steel, E., and York, A. (2014b). Detecting mammals in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for biodiversity monitoring and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 343–355.
| Detecting mammals in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for biodiversity monitoring and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swann, D. E., Hass, C. C., Dalton, D. C., and Wolf, S. A. (2004). Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: An evaluation and review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 357–365.
| Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: An evaluation and review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Séquin, E. S., Jaeger, M. M., Brussard, P. F., and Barrett, R. H. (2003). Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 2015–2025.
| Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trolliet, F., Huynen, M.-C., Vermeulen, C., and Hambuckers, A. (2014). Use of camera traps for wildlife studies. A review. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 18, 446–454.
Urlus, J., McCutcheon, C., Gilmore, D., and McMahon, J. (2014). The effect of camera trap type on the probability of detecting different size classes of Australian mammals. In ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research’. (Eds P. Meek, P. Fleming, G. Ballard, P. Banks, A. Claridge, J. Sanderson, and D. Swann.) pp. 153–165. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (2002). ‘Modern Applied Statistics with S’, 4th edn. (Springer: New York.)
Wayne, A. F., Maxwell, M. A., Ward, C. G., Vellios, C. V., Ward, B. G., Liddelow, G. L., Wilson, I., Wayne, J. C., and Williams, M. R. (2013). Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata. Wildlife Research 40, 169–183.
| Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wayne, A. F., Maxwell, M. A., Ward, C. G., Wayne, J. C., Vellios, C. V., and Wilson, I. J. (2017). Recoveries and cascading declines of native mammals associated with control of an introduced predator. Journal of Mammalogy 98, 489–501.
| Recoveries and cascading declines of native mammals associated with control of an introduced predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wearn, O. R., and Glover-Kapfer, P. (2017). Camera-trapping for conservation: a guide to best-practices. WWF Conservation Technology, Number Series 1, Woking, United Kingdom.
Welbourne, D. J., Claridge, A. W., Paull, D. J., and Lambert, A. (2016). How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2, 77–83.
| How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yeatman, G. J., Wayne, A. F., Mills, H. R., and Prince, J. (2016). Temporal patterns in the abundance of a critically endangered marsupial relates to disturbance by roads and agriculture. PLoS One 11, e0160790.
| Temporal patterns in the abundance of a critically endangered marsupial relates to disturbance by roads and agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27501320PubMed |
Yu, X., Wang, J., Kays, R., Jansen, P. A., Wang, T., and Huang, T. (2013). Automated identification of animal species in camera trap images. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2013, 52.
| Automated identification of animal species in camera trap images.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zosky, K. L., Wayne, A. F., Bryant, K. A., Calver, M. C., and Scarff, F. R. (2017). Diet of the critically endangered woylie (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 65, 302–312.
| Diet of the critically endangered woylie (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
