Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Attitudes towards dingoes (Canis dingo) and their management: a case study from a mining operation in the Great Sandy Desert, Western Australia

Bradley P. Smith https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-3917 A D , Anne-Louise Vague B and Robert G. Appleby C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Central Queensland University, Appleton Institute, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia.

B Newcrest Mining Limited, Telfer Environment, 1 Centro Avenue, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia.

C Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: b.p.smith@cqu.edu.au.

Pacific Conservation Biology 25(3) 308-321 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18049
Submitted: 31 May 2018  Accepted: 16 October 2018   Published: 9 November 2018

Abstract

This study provides insight into the attitudes and perceptions of people who live alongside dingoes in a remote Australian mining town. A mixed-methods, self-administered questionnaire was circulated, targeting employees across 11 departments (n = 160). Overall, employees saw dingoes favourably (60.5%), and believed that humans and dingoes should be able to coexist (75.8%). Dingoes were not considered to be causing unacceptable damage or to be overabundant, despite being seen almost daily at both the village and work sites. A total of 31.4% of employees had felt threatened or scared because of a dingo on more than one occasion, and 16.5% had experienced a dingo being aggressive towards them at least once. Yet, only 21.0% of employees considered dingoes dangerous to people, and few worried about their safety at the village or work site (9.5% and 11.4% respectively), or the safety of others in general (21.6%). There was a dichotomy of views regarding the dingo’s presence: employees were supportive of dingoes living in close proximity at the mine, as long as they were not directly being problematic (i.e. representing a personal threat, or causing property damage). Half of the employees surveyed (50.4%) felt that management decisions relating to dingoes were personally important to them, highlighting the need to ensure that employees are consulted, and that dingo management strategies are well communicated. These findings have implications for improving the success rates of management approaches to human–carnivore conflict at mine sites and other situations where predators are perceived to threaten human safety.

Additional keywords: conservation, feral dogs, mammals, public attitudes, social sciences, wildlife management.


References

Allen, L. R. (2015). Demographic and functional responses of wild dogs to poison baiting. Ecological Management & Restoration 16, 58–66.
Demographic and functional responses of wild dogs to poison baiting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen, L. R., and Sparkes, E. C. (2001). The effect of dingo control on sheep and beef cattle in Queensland. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 76–87.
The effect of dingo control on sheep and beef cattle in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen, B., Boswell, J. and Higginbottom, K. (2012). Fraser Island dingo management strategy review. Report to Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Ecosure, West Burleigh, Queensland.

Allen, B. L., Fleming, P. J., Allen, L. R., Engeman, R. M., Ballard, G., and Leung, L. K. P. (2013). As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation 159, 158–174.
As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen, B., Higginbottom, K., Bracks, J., Davies, N., and Baxter, G. (2015). Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22, 197–215.
Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen, B., Carmelito, E., Amos, M., Goullet, M., Allen, L., Speed, J., Gentle, M., and Leung, L. (2016). Diet of dingoes and other wild dogs in periurban areas of north-eastern Australia. Scientific Reports 6, 23028.
Diet of dingoes and other wild dogs in periurban areas of north-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Appleby, R. (2015). Dingo–human conflict: attacks on humans. In ‘Dingo Debate Origins, Behaviour and Conservation’. (Ed. B. Smith.) pp. 131–157. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Appleby, R., Mackie, J., Smith, B., Bernede, L., and Jones, D. (2017). Negative human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of incident reports. Australian Mammalogy , .
Negative human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of incident reports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Behrendorff, L., Leung, L. K.-P., McKinnon, A., Hanger, J., Belonje, G., Tapply, J., Jones, D., and Allen, B. L. (2016). Insects for breakfast and whales for dinner: the diet and body condition of dingoes on Fraser Island (K’gari). Scientific Reports 6, 23469.
Insects for breakfast and whales for dinner: the diet and body condition of dingoes on Fraser Island (K’gari).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braun, V., and Clarke, C. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burns, G. L., and Howard, P. (2003). When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia. Tourism Management 24, 699–712.
When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Butler, J. R., Linnell, J. D., Morrant, D., Athreya, V., Lescureux, N., and McKeown, A. (2014). Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: social–ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In ‘Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation’. (Ed. M. E. Gompper.) pp. 117–143. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Butler, J. R. A., Young, J. C., McMyn, I., Leyshon, B., Graham, I. M., Walker, I., Baxter, J. M., Dodd, J., and Warburton, C. (2015). Evaluating adaptive co-management as conservation conflict resolution: learning from seals and salmon. Journal of Environmental Management 160, 212–225.
Evaluating adaptive co-management as conservation conflict resolution: learning from seals and salmon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Corbett, L. K. (1998). Management of dingoes on Fraser Island. ERA Environmental Services.

Corbett, L. K. (2001). ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia.’ (JB Books Pty Ltd: Adelaide.)

DAFF (2012). Wild dog facts: Why control wild dogs? Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland Government, Brisbane.

DEEDI (2011). Wild Dog Management Strategy 2011–16. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane.

DEHP (2013). Fraser Island dingo conservation and risk management strategy. The Queensland State Government.

Dickman, A. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation 13, 458–466.
Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., Carpenter, S. R., Essington, T. E., Holt, R. D., and Jackson, J. B. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306.
Trophic downgrading of planet Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fleming, P., Corbett, L. K., Harden, R., and Thomson, P. (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and Other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra.)

Fox, M. (1971). ‘Behavior of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canids.’ (Jonathon Cape: London.)

Fritts, S. H., Stephenson, R. O., Hayes, R. D., and Boitani, L. (2003). Wolves and humans. In ‘Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation’. (Eds L. D. Mech and L. Boitani.) pp. 289–316. (University of Chicago: Chicago.)

Glen, A. S., Dickman, C. R., Soul, M. E., and Mackey, B. G. (2007). Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator in Australian ecosystems. Austral Ecology 32, 492–501.
Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator in Australian ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heinen, J. T., and Low, B. S. (1992). Human behavioural ecology and environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation 19, 105–116.
Human behavioural ecology and environmental conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hewitt, L. (2009). Major economic costs associated with wild dogs in the Queensland grazing industry. AgForce, Brisbane.

Johnson, C. N., and Wallach, A. D. (2016). The virtuous circle: predator friendly farming and ecological restoration in Australia. Restoration Ecology 24, 821–826.
The virtuous circle: predator friendly farming and ecological restoration in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnston, M. J., and Marks, C. A. (1997). Attitudinal survey on vertebrate pest management in Victoria. Agriculture Victoria, Institute of Animal Science, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne. Report Series (Vol. 3).

Kaltenborn, B. P., Bjerke, T., Nyahongo, J. W., and Williams, D. R. (2006). Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 15, 4633–4649.
Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kansky, R., and Knight, A. T. (2014). Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation 179, 93–105.
Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kansky, R., Kidd, M., and Knight, A. T. (2014). Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife. Conservation Biology 28, 924–938.
Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kellert, S. R., and Wilson, E. O. (Eds) (1993). ‘The Biophilia Hypothesis.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Lawrance, K., and Higginbottom, K. (2003). Behavioural responses of dingoes to tourists on Fraser Island. CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Canberra.

Miller, K. K., Ritchie, E. G., and Weston, M. A. (2013). The human dimensions of dog–wildlife interactions. In ‘Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation’. (Ed. M. E. Gompper.) pp. 286–304. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Naughton-Treves, L., Grossberg, R., and Treves, A. (2003). Paying for tolerance: rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation Biology 17, 1500–1511.
Paying for tolerance: rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson, M. P., and Moore, K. D. (2016). The moral urgency of action to protect the world’s megafauna. Bioscience 66, 1009–1010.
The moral urgency of action to protect the world’s megafauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Ballard, G. A., Dickman, C. R., Fleming, P. J., and van de Ven, R. (2013a). Home range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: a test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis. Ecography 36, 914–925.
Home range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: a test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Stephens, D., Ballard, G. A., Dickman, C. R., and Fleming, P. J. (2013b). Genetic profile of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo) and free-roaming domestic dogs (C. l. familiaris) in the Tanami Desert. Australian Wildlife Research 40, 196–206.
Genetic profile of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo) and free-roaming domestic dogs (C. l. familiaris) in the Tanami Desert.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Ballard, G. A., Crowther, M. S., Fleming, P. J., and Dickman, C. R. (2014). Dietary niche overlap of free-roaming dingoes and domestic dogs: the role of human-provided food. Journal of Mammalogy 95, 392–403.
Dietary niche overlap of free-roaming dingoes and domestic dogs: the role of human-provided food.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Ballard, G.-A., Crowther, M. S., Dellinger, J. A., Fleming, P. J. S., Glen, A. S., Greenville, A. C., Johnson, C. N., Letnic, M., Moseby, K. E., Nimmo, D. G., Nelson, M. P., Read, J. L., Ripple, W. J., Ritchie, E. G., Shores, C. R., Wallach, A. D., Wirsing, A. J., and Dickman, C. R. (2015). Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 23, 201–208.
Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Greenville, A. C., Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2017). The case for a dingo reintroduction in Australia remains strong: a reply to Morgan et al., 2016. Food Webs 10, 39–41.
The case for a dingo reintroduction in Australia remains strong: a reply to Morgan et al., 2016.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nyhus, P. (2016). Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41, 143–171.
Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Neill, A. J., Cairns, K. M., Kaplan, G., and Healy, E. (2017). Managing dingoes on Fraser Island: culling, conflict, and an alternative. Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 4–14.
Managing dingoes on Fraser Island: culling, conflict, and an alternative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pacioni, C., Kennedy, M. S., Berry, O., Stephens, D., and Schumaker, N. H. (2018). Spatially-explicit model for assessing wild dog control strategies in Western Australia. Ecological Modelling 368, 246–256.
Spatially-explicit model for assessing wild dog control strategies in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parry, D., and Campbell, B. (1992). Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Botswana. Environmental Conservation 19, 245–252.
Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe Enclave and Mababe Depression, Botswana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

QPWS (2015). Be dingo safe. Flyer, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of National Parks, Sport and Racing, Queensland Government. Available at: http://www.nprsr.qld.gov.au/parks/fraser/pdf/be-dingo-safe-flyer.pdf.

Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnel, J. D. C., Watt, A., and Gutierrez, R. J. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 100–109.
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., and Nelson, M. P. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484.
Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sillero-Zubiri, C., and Switzer, D. (2004). Management of wild canids in human dominated landscapes. In ‘Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan’. 2nd edn. (Eds C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffmann, and D. W. Macdonald.) pp. 257–266. (IUCN Canid Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.)

Smith, N. (1999). The howl and the pussy: feral cats and wild dogs in the Australian imagination. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 10, 288–305.
The howl and the pussy: feral cats and wild dogs in the Australian imagination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, B. (2015). ‘The Dingo Debate: Origins, Behaviour and Conservation.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Smith, B. P., and Appleby, R. G. (2015). Forging a new future for the Australian dingo. In ‘The Dingo Debate: Origins, Behaviour and Conservation’. (Ed. B. Smith.) pp. 301–315. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Smith, B. P., and Appleby, R. G. (2018). Promoting human–dingo co-existence in Australia: moving towards more innovative methods of protecting livestock rather than killing dingoes (Canis dingo). Wildlife Research 45, 1–15.
Promoting human–dingo co-existence in Australia: moving towards more innovative methods of protecting livestock rather than killing dingoes (Canis dingo).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, B. P., and Litchfield, C. A. (2009). A review of the relationship between Indigenous Australians, dingoes (Canis dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoos 22, 111–128.
A review of the relationship between Indigenous Australians, dingoes (Canis dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, B., and Vague, A.-L. (2017). The denning behaviour of dingoes (Canis dingo) living in a human-modified environment. Australian Mammalogy 39, 161–168.
The denning behaviour of dingoes (Canis dingo) living in a human-modified environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thirgood, S., Woodroffe, R., and Rabinowitz, A. (2005). The impact of human–wildlife conflict on human lives and livelihoods. In ‘People and Wildlife: Conflict or Co-existence’. (Eds R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz.) pp. 13–26. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Thomson, P. (1992). The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. II. Activity patterns, breeding season and pup rearing. Wildlife Research 19, 519–530.
The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. II. Activity patterns, breeding season and pup rearing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L., and Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11, 383–396.
Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vucetich, J. A., Bruskotter, J. T., and Nelson, M. P. (2015). Evaluating whether nature’s intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation. Conservation Biology 29, 321–332.
Evaluating whether nature’s intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wallach, A. D., Ritchie, E. G., Read, J., and O’Neill, A. J. (2009). More than mere numbers: the impact of lethal control on the social stability of a top-order predator. PLoS One 4, .
More than mere numbers: the impact of lethal control on the social stability of a top-order predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |