Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How should I revise my paper?

Mike Calver

Pacific Conservation Biology 16(1) 2 - 3
Published: 2010

Abstract

Many readers will have seen the YouTube parodies based on the movie Downfall in which new subtitles are substituted for the original ones to redirect Adolf Hitler?s rage to car thieves, computer software, entertainers and many other targets. For authors of scientific papers, the most popular parody of all is probably the attack on the peer review process (http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=VRBWLpYCPY). In this, Hitler (or Herr Professor as he is called in the subtitles) receives two favourable reviews on a submitted paper, but the third reviewer feels that the conclusions aren?t justified by the data and insists on additional experiments before publication. Hitler bursts into a furious diatribe against ignorant reviewers and the editors who select them. The peer review parody has attracted numerous comments, including many from people who claim to have received insensitive or inappropriate reviews.

https://doi.org/10.1071/PC100002

© CSIRO 2010

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (99 KB) Export Citation Get Permission

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email