A comparison of two nutrition signposting systems for use in Australia
Jimmy Chun-Yu Louie A , Victoria Flood A , Anna Rangan A , Debra J. Hector A and Tim Gill A BA NSW Centre for Public Health Nutrition, The University of Sydney
B Corresponding author. Email: t.gill@mmb.usyd.edu.au
NSW Public Health Bulletin 19(8) 121-126 https://doi.org/10.1071/NB07118
Published: 20 October 2008
Abstract
Consumers are interested in making healthier food choices but the mandatory nutrition information panel currently in use in Australia is not easily understood or interpreted by most consumers. A simple nutrition signpost would be valuable. This paper reviews two nutrition signposting systems currently being considered for adoption in Australia. The authors conclude that a system similar to the colour-coded Traffic Light System is likely to be most useful.
Acknowledgment
The NSW Centre for Public Health Nutrition is funded by NSW Health and The Nutrition Research Foundation of The University of Sydney. This review was initiated and conducted by the investigators, and does not necessarily represent the view of the funding groups.
[1] van Kleef E, van Trijp H, Paeps F, Fernández-Celemín L. Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling. Public Health Nutr 2007; 11(2): 203–13.
| PubMed | (Cited 9 August 2007.)
[5] Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2005; 8(1): 21–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (Cited 20 May 2008.)
[16] Kinnunen TI. The heart symbol: A new food labelling system in Finland. Nutr Bull 2000; 25 335–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (Cited 20 May 2008.)
[18]
[19]
[20] Beard TC, Nowson CA, Riley MD. Traffic-light food labels. Med J Aust 2007; 186(1): 19.
| PubMed | (Cited 7 November 2007.)
[24] Jones G, Richardson M. An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10(3): 238–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (Cited 27 August 2007.)
[26]
[27] Bussell G. Nutritional profiling vs guideline daily amounts as a means of helping consumers make appropriate food choices. Nutr Food Sci 2005; 35(5): 337–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (Cited 9 August 2007.)
[30] Rayner M, Scarborough P, Williams C. The origin of Guideline Daily Amounts and the Food Standards Agency’s guidance on what counts as ‘a lot’ and ‘a little’. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7(4): 549–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (Cited 23 October 2007.)
[32] Levy L, Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Li S. How well do consumers understand percentage daily value on food labels? Am J Health Promot 2000; 14(3): 157–60.
| PubMed | CAS | (Cited 9 August 2007.)
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]