The influence of nest-site choice and predator sensory cues on nesting success in the Crimson Finch (Neochmia phaeton)
Rebekah Soanes A , Anne Peters A , Kaspar Delhey A and J. Sean Doody A B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Biological Sciences, Monash University (Building 18), Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
B Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, 569 Dabney Hall, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1610, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: jseandoody@gmail.com
Emu 115(4) 317-325 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU14046
Submitted: 6 May 2014 Accepted: 6 June 2015 Published: 27 July 2015
Abstract
The attributes of a nest-site that a bird selects may be influenced by the potential predator species present, as different types of predator use different foraging strategies and sensory cues to locate nests. However, in many studies of avian nesting, the identity of the main nest predators and their foraging strategies are not known, limiting our interpretation and understanding of how choice of nest-site and nesting success might be linked. We investigated nest-site choice, nest survival and the nest predators in a population of Crimson Finch (Neochmia phaeton) in tropical Australia. Crimson Finches preferred to nest among foliage of the crowns of Pandanus on stems with aquatic barriers, and near old nests of conspecifics. However, none of these or any other attributes of nest-sites that we recorded significantly affected nest survival. Moreover, neither visual nor olfactory cues influenced nesting success in field experiments with quail eggs. Similar rates of predation of natural and experimental nests, coupled with similar rates of daily predation of eggs and nestlings suggest that predators were not using nest-attendance behaviour of the adult Finches as a cue to find active nests. Identified nest predators were reptiles; our study suggests that Crimson Finches may not be able to choose nest-sites that reduce the ability of these olfactory-driven predators.
Additional keywords: nest predation, concealment, olfactory cues, visual cues, birds, monitor lizards, Water Python.
References
Angelstam, P. (1986). Predation on ground-nesting birds’ nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47, 365–373.| Predation on ground-nesting birds’ nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Best, L. B. (1978). Field Sparrow reproductive success and nesting ecology. Auk 95, 9–22.
| Field Sparrow reproductive success and nesting ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blaustein, L. (1999). Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population dynamics and community structure. In ‘Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Perspectives’. (Ed. S. Wasser.) pp. 441–456. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Boulton, R. L., and Clark, M. F. (2003). Do Yellow-faced Honeyeater (Lichenostomus chrysops) nests experience higher predation at forest edges? Wildlife Research 30, 119–125.
| Do Yellow-faced Honeyeater (Lichenostomus chrysops) nests experience higher predation at forest edges?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bradter, U., Gombobaatar, S., Uuganbayar, C., Grazia, T. E., and Exo, K. M. (2005). Reproductive performance and nest-site selection of White-naped Cranes Grus vipio in the Ulz River Valley, north-eastern Mongolia. Bird Conservation International 15, 313–326.
| Reproductive performance and nest-site selection of White-naped Cranes Grus vipio in the Ulz River Valley, north-eastern Mongolia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burghardt, G. M. (1970). Chemical perception in reptiles. In ‘Advances in Chemoreception. Vol. I: Communication by Chemical Signals’. (Eds J. W. Johnston, D. G. Moulton and A. Turk.) pp. 241–308. (Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York.)
Chase, M. K. (2002). Nest-site selection and nest success in a Song Sparrow population: the significance of spatial variation. Condor 104, 103–116.
| Nest-site selection and nest success in a Song Sparrow population: the significance of spatial variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clark, R. G., and Nudds, T. D. (1991). Habitat patch size and duck nesting success: the crucial experiments have not been performed. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19, 534–543.
Clark, R. G., and Shutler, D. (1999). Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80, 272–287.
| Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Colombelli-Négrel, D., and Kleindorfer, S. (2009). Nest height, nest concealment, and predator type predict nest predation in Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Ecological Research 24, 921–928.
| Nest height, nest concealment, and predator type predict nest predation in Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Conover, M. R. (2007). ‘Predator–Prey Dynamics: The Role of Olfaction.’ (Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL.)
Cooper, W. E. Jr (1989). Prey odor discrimination in the varanoid lizards Heloderma suspectum and Varanus exanthematicus. Ethology 81, 250–258.
| Prey odor discrimination in the varanoid lizards Heloderma suspectum and Varanus exanthematicus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, W. E. (1994). Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 439–487.
| Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXhvVOnt7g%3D&md5=65ed2fe8fb434ef0a1770119c6979df9CAS | 24242066PubMed |
Cooper, W. E. (1995). Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Animal Behaviour 50, 973–985.
| Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, W. E., Burghardt, G. M., and Brown, W. S. (2000). Behavioural responses by hatchling Racers (Coluber constrictor) from two geographically distinct populations to chemical stimuli from potential prey and predators. Amphibia-Reptilia 21, 103–115.
| Behavioural responses by hatchling Racers (Coluber constrictor) from two geographically distinct populations to chemical stimuli from potential prey and predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cresswell, W. (1997). Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Animal Behaviour 53, 93–103.
| Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dawson, R. D., Lawrie, C. C., and O’Brien, E. L. (2005). The importance of microclimate variation in determining size, growth and survival of avian offspring: experimental evidence from a cavity nesting passerine. Oecologia 144, 499–507.
| The importance of microclimate variation in determining size, growth and survival of avian offspring: experimental evidence from a cavity nesting passerine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15891832PubMed |
Donovan, T. M., Jones, P. W., Annand, E. M., and Thompson, F. R. (1997). Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78, 2064–2075.
| Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doody, J. S., Milenkaya, O., Rhind, D., Eastley, T., and Penrose, K. (2010). Varanus mitchelli (Mitchell’s Water Monitor). Diet and foraging behaviour. Herpetological Review 41, 233–234.
Fargallo, J. A., De Leon, A., and Potti, J. (2001). Nest-maintenance effort and health status in Chinstrap Penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica: the functional significance of stone-provisioning behaviour. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50, 141–150.
| Nest-maintenance effort and health status in Chinstrap Penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica: the functional significance of stone-provisioning behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Filliater, T. S., Breitwisch, R., and Nealen, P. M. (1994). Predation on Northern Cardinal nests: does choice of nest site matter? Condor 96, 761–768.
| Predation on Northern Cardinal nests: does choice of nest site matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fowler, J., Cohen, L., and Jarvis, P. (1988). ‘Practical Statistics for Field Biology.’ 2nd edn.’ (John Wiley and Sons: Brighton, Sussex.)
Galligan, T. H., and Kleindorfer, S. (2008). Support for the nest mimicry hypothesis in Yellow-rumped Thornbills Acanthiza chrysorrhoa. Ibis 150, 550–557.
| Support for the nest mimicry hypothesis in Yellow-rumped Thornbills Acanthiza chrysorrhoa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanssen, S. A., and Erikstad, K. E. (2013). The long-term consequences of egg predation. Behavioral Ecology 24, 564–569.
| The long-term consequences of egg predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haskell, D. (1994). Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 257, 161–164.
| Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herring, H. K., and Gawlik, D. E. (2011). Resource selection functions for Wood Stork foraging habitat in the southern Everglades. Waterbirds 34, 133–142.
| Resource selection functions for Wood Stork foraging habitat in the southern Everglades.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Cowling, S. J. (Eds) (2006). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 7: Boatbill to Starlings.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Holway, D. A. (1991). Nest-site selection and the importance of nest concealment in the Black-throated Blue Warbler. Condor 93, 575–581.
| Nest-site selection and the importance of nest concealment in the Black-throated Blue Warbler.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoover, J. P. (2006). Water depth influences nest predation for a wetland-dependant bird in fragmented bottomland forests. Biological Conservation 127, 37–45.
| Water depth influences nest predation for a wetland-dependant bird in fragmented bottomland forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Howlett, J. S., and Stutchbury, B. J. (1996). Nest concealment and predation in Hooded Warblers: experimental removal of nest cover. Auk 113, 1–9.
| Nest concealment and predation in Hooded Warblers: experimental removal of nest cover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Sanllorente, O., Arco, L., and Soler, M. (2013). Does nest predation risk induce parent birds to eat nestlings’ fecal sacs? An experimental study. Annales Zoologici Fennici 50, 71–78.
| Does nest predation risk induce parent birds to eat nestlings’ fecal sacs? An experimental study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Immelmann, K. (1967). ‘Australian Finches in Bush and Aviary.’ Revised edn. (Angus and Robertson: Sydney.)
Kleindorfer, S. (2007). Nesting success in Darwin’s Small Tree Finch, Camarhynchus parvulus: evidence of female preference for older males and more concealed nests. Animal Behaviour 74, 795–804.
| Nesting success in Darwin’s Small Tree Finch, Camarhynchus parvulus: evidence of female preference for older males and more concealed nests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Komdeur, J., and Kats, R. K. H. (1999). Predation risk affects trade-off between nest guarding and foraging in Seychelles Warblers. Behavioral Ecology 10, 648–658.
| Predation risk affects trade-off between nest guarding and foraging in Seychelles Warblers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kotler, B. P., Blaustein, L., and Brown, J. S. (1992). Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Annales Zoologici Fennici 29, 199–206.
Lack, D. (1968). ‘Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds.’ (Methuen: London.)
Larivière, S. (1999). Reasons why predators cannot be inferred from nest remains. Condor 101, 718–721.
| Reasons why predators cannot be inferred from nest remains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Latif, Q. S., Heath, S. K., and Rotenberry, J. T. (2012). How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis’. Journal of Animal Ecology 81, 127–138.
| How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21848943PubMed |
Li, P. J., and Martin, T. E. (1991). Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk 108, 405–418.
Liebezeit, J. R., and George, T. L. (2002). Nest predators, nest-site selection, and nesting success of the Dusky Flycatcher in a managed ponderosa pine forest. Condor 104, 507–517.
| Nest predators, nest-site selection, and nesting success of the Dusky Flycatcher in a managed ponderosa pine forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liebezeit, J. R., and Zack, S. (2008). Point counts underestimate the importance of Arctic Foxes as avian nest predators: evidence from remote video cameras in Arctic Alaskan oil fields. Arctic 61, 153–161.
Major, R. E. (1991). Identification of nest predators by photography, dummy eggs, and adhesive tape. Auk 108, 190–196.
Marini, M. A., and Melo, C. (1998). Predators of quail eggs, and the evidence of the remains: implications for nest predation studies. Condor 100, 395–399.
| Predators of quail eggs, and the evidence of the remains: implications for nest predation studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, T. E. (1992). Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology 9, 163–197.
| Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives and old patterns. Bioscience 43, 523–532.
| Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives and old patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, T. E. (1995). Avain life-history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs 65, 101–127.
| Avain life-history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, T. E. (1998). Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79, 656–670.
| Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, T. E., Scott, J., and Menge, C. (2000). Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 267, 2287–2293.
| Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzltFSltg%3D%3D&md5=5c80353f74cb2f6334a9cf39694024cdCAS |
Meilvang, D., Moksnes, A., and Røskaft, E. (1997). Nest predation, nesting characteristics and nest defence behaviour of Fieldfares and Redwings. Journal of Avian Biology 28, 331–337.
| Nest predation, nesting characteristics and nest defence behaviour of Fieldfares and Redwings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Milenkaya, O., Legge, S., and Walters, J. R. (2011). Breeding biology and life-history traits of an Australasian tropical granivore, the Crimson Finch (Neochmia phaeton). Emu 111, 312–320.
| Breeding biology and life-history traits of an Australasian tropical granivore, the Crimson Finch (Neochmia phaeton).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Misenhelter, M. D., and Rotenberry, J. T. (2000). Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in Sage Sparrows. Ecology 81, 2892–2901.
| Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in Sage Sparrows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pascale, M., Dickinson, K. J. M., Barratt, B. I. P., and Jamieson, I. G. (2010). Habitat selection in reintroduced bird populations: a case study of Stewart Island Robins and South Island Saddlebacks on Ulva Island. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 34, 237–246.
Pierce, B. M., Longland, W. S., and Jenkins, S. H. (1992). Rattlesnake predation on desert rodents: microhabitat and species-specific effects on risk. Journal of Mammalogy 73, 859–865.
| Rattlesnake predation on desert rodents: microhabitat and species-specific effects on risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Development Core Team (2009). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rangel-Salazar, J. L., Martin, K., Marshall, P., and Elner, R. W. (2008). Influence of habitat variation, nest-site selection, and parental behavior on breeding success of Ruddy-capped Nightingale Thrushes (Catharus frantzii) in Chiapas, Mexico. Auk 125, 358–367.
| Influence of habitat variation, nest-site selection, and parental behavior on breeding success of Ruddy-capped Nightingale Thrushes (Catharus frantzii) in Chiapas, Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Refsnider, J., and Janzen, F. J. (2010). Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 41, 39–57.
| Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Remeš, V. (2005a). Birds and rodents destroy different nests: a study of Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla using the removal of nest concealment. Ibis 147, 213–216.
| Birds and rodents destroy different nests: a study of Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla using the removal of nest concealment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Remeš, V. (2005b). Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58, 326–332.
| Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rendell, W. B., and Verbeek, N. A. M. (1996). Are avian ectoparasites more numerous in nest boxes with old nest material? Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 1819–1825.
| Are avian ectoparasites more numerous in nest boxes with old nest material?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Resitarits, W. J. (1996). Oviposition site choice and life history evolution. American Zoologist 36, 205–215.
Ricklefs, R. E. (1969). An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9, 1–48.
| An analysis of nesting mortality in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson, B. A. (2009). Nest-site selection in a postfire landscape: do parents make tradeoffs between microclimate and predation risk? Auk 126, 500–510.
| Nest-site selection in a postfire landscape: do parents make tradeoffs between microclimate and predation risk?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robinson, W. D., and Robinson, T. R. (2001). Observations of predation events at bird nests in central Panama. Journal of Field Ornithology 72, 43–48.
| Observations of predation events at bird nests in central Panama.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson, F. R. (2007). Factors affecting nest predation on forest songbirds in North America. Ibis 149, 98–109.
| Factors affecting nest predation on forest songbirds in North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tidemann, S. C., Lawson, C., Elvish, R., Boyden, J., and Elvish, J. (1999). Breeding biology of the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae, an endangered finch of Northern Australia. Emu 99, 191–199.
| Breeding biology of the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae, an endangered finch of Northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Todd, K. M. (2002). Nest-site and breeding-season data for the Crimson Finch Neochmia phaeton in Australia. Australian Bird Watcher 19, 161–171.
Todd, K. M., Felton, A., and Garnett, T. S. (2003). Morphological and dietary differences between common and uncommon subspecies of Crimson Finch, Neochmia phaeton, and Star Finch, Neochmia ruficauda, in northern Australia. Emu 103, 141–148.
| Morphological and dietary differences between common and uncommon subspecies of Crimson Finch, Neochmia phaeton, and Star Finch, Neochmia ruficauda, in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weidinger, K. (2002). Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 424–437.
| Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weidinger, K. (2010). Foraging behaviour of nest predators at open-cup nests of woodland passerines. Journal für Ornithologie 151, 729–735.
| Foraging behaviour of nest predators at open-cup nests of woodland passerines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wesołowski, T. (2006). Nest-site re-use: Marsh Tit Poecile palustris decisions in a primeval forest. Bird Study 53, 199–204.
| Nest-site re-use: Marsh Tit Poecile palustris decisions in a primeval forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, G. C., and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, S120–S139.
| Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, R. R., and Cooper, R. J. (1998). Acadian Flycatcher nest placement: does placement influence reproductive success? Condor 100, 673–679.
| Acadian Flycatcher nest placement: does placement influence reproductive success?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Willson, M. F., and Gende, S. M. (2000). Nesting success of forest birds in southeast Alaska and adjacent Canada. Condor 102, 314–324.
| Nesting success of forest birds in southeast Alaska and adjacent Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woinarski, J. C. Z., Legge, S., Fitzsimons, J. A., Traill, B. J., Burbidge, A. A., Fisher, A., Firth, R. S. C., Gordon, I. J., Griffits, A. D., Johnson, C. N., McKenzie, N. L., Palmer, C., Radford, I., Rankmore, B., Ritchie, E. G., Ward, S., and Ziembicki, M. (2011). The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause and response. Conservation Letters 4, 192–201.
| The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause and response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhu, X., Srivastava, D. S., Smith, J. N. M., and Martin, K. (2012). Habitat selection and reproductive success of Lewis’ Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) at its northern limit. PLoS One 7, e44346.
| Habitat selection and reproductive success of Lewis’ Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) at its northern limit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVWlsbjF&md5=ac8e7218f9d750323e15bc3bef995575CAS | 23028525PubMed |