Foraging behaviour of the Peaceful Dove (Geopelia striata) in relation to predation risk: group size and predator cues in a natural environment
Lei (Stanley) Tang A B and Lin Schwarzkopf A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Marine & Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Present address: Australian Tropical Science and Innovation Precinct, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. Email: stanley.tang@my.jcu.edu.au
Emu 113(1) 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU12023
Submitted: 10 November 2011 Accepted: 31 August 2012 Published: 31 October 2012
Abstract
Foraging behaviour is directly influenced by the risk of predation, which is in turn influenced by distance to cover, height of vegetation and predator cues. In this study, we used giving-up density (GUD) to investigate the foraging behaviour of the Peaceful Dove (Geopelia striata) in relation to predation risk. We simulated predation risk by placing feeding patches in grass of various heights, and visual and auditory predator cues were also simulated. GUD was higher near tall grass and minimum GUD of individuals remained similar among different group sizes. Both visual cues and the combination of visual and acoustic cues altered the patterns of GUD significantly, but the effects of the two treatments did not differ from each other. We conclude that changes in vegetation structure and visual predator cues can strongly increase the assessment of predation risk by ground-feeding birds. Grouping behaviour in this species was not entirely a result of clumped food resources in their natural environment but was influenced by anti-predator strategies and birds could maintain higher food intake in more dangerous places when in groups. Our study used a rare, but important, field experimental approach to determine factors that affect foraging behaviour in a bird.
References
Abrahams, M. V., and Dill, L. M. (1989). A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology 70, 999–1007.| A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Amo, L., Visser, M. E., and van Oers, K. (2011). Smelling out predators is innate in birds. Ardea 99, 177–184.
| Smelling out predators is innate in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blumstein, N. T., Daniel, J. C., Griffin, A. S., and Evans, C. S. (2000). Insular Tammar Wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators. Behavioral Ecology 11, 528–535.
| Insular Tammar Wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, J. S. (1988). Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22, 37–47.
| Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, J. S. (1992). Patch use under predation risk. I. Models and predictions. Annales Zoologici Fennici 29, 301–309.
Brown, J. S., and Kotler, B. P. (2007). Foraging and the ecology of fear. In ‘Foraging: Behavior and Ecology’. (Eds D. W. Stephens, J. S. Brown and R. C. Ydenberg.) pp. 437–482. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)
Caraco, T., Martindale, S., and Pulliam, H. R. (1980). Avian time budgets in the presence of a predator. Nature 285, 400–401.
| Avian time budgets in the presence of a predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caro, T. M. (2005). ‘Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)
Crome, F., and Shields, J. (1992). ‘Parrots and Pigeons of Australia.’ (Angus and Robertson: Sydney, NSW.)
Delm, M. M. (1990). Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26, 337–342.
| Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Elgar, M. A. (1989). Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 64, 13–33.
| Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKltQ%3D%3D&md5=4a8fe2ee1c8a0816d03f27555a7da74dCAS |
Fernández, G. J., Capurro, A. F., and Reboreda, J. C. (2003). Effect of group size on individual and collective vigilance in Greater Rheas. Ethology 109, 413–425.
| Effect of group size on individual and collective vigilance in Greater Rheas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glück, E. (1987). An experimental study of feeding, vigilance and predator avoidance in a single bird. Oecologia 71, 268–272.
| An experimental study of feeding, vigilance and predator avoidance in a single bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goodwin, D. (1970). ‘Pigeons and Doves of the World.’ (The British Museum: London.)
Greig-Smith, P. W. (1981). Responses to disturbance in relation to flock size in foraging groups of Barred Ground Doves Geopelia striata. Ibis 123, 103–106.
| Responses to disturbance in relation to flock size in foraging groups of Barred Ground Doves Geopelia striata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffin, A. S., Savani, R. S., Hausmanis, K., and Lefebvre, L. (2005). Mixed-species aggregations in birds: Zenaida Doves, Zenaida aurita, respond to the alarm calls of Carib Grackles, Quiscalus lugubris. Animal Behaviour 70, 507–515.
| Mixed-species aggregations in birds: Zenaida Doves, Zenaida aurita, respond to the alarm calls of Carib Grackles, Quiscalus lugubris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higgins, P. J., and Davies, S. J. J. E. (Eds) (2006). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 3: Snipe to Pigeons.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Hingee, M., and Magrath, R. D. (2009). Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B – Biological Sciences 276, 4173–4179.
| Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacob, J., and Brown, J. S. (2000). Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in Common Voles. Oikos 91, 131–138.
| Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in Common Voles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jarman, P. J., and Coulson, G. (1989). Dynamics and adaptiveness of grouping in macropods. In ‘Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-Kangaroos’. (Eds G. Grigg, P. J. Jarman and I. Hume.) (Surrey Beatty and Sons: Sydney, NSW.)
Kenward, R. E. (1978). Hawks and doves: attack success and selection in goshawk flights at wood-pigeons. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 449–460.
| Hawks and doves: attack success and selection in goshawk flights at wood-pigeons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kotler, B. P., and Blaustein, L. (1995). Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: where are the risky and safe patches of equal value? Oikos 74, 251–258.
| Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: where are the risky and safe patches of equal value?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lazarus, J. (1979). The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Animal Behaviour 27, 855–865.
| The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lima, S. L. (1990). The influence of models on the interpretation of vigilance. In ‘Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior: Vol. 2: Explanation, Evolution and Adaptation’. (Eds M. Bekoff and D. Jamieson.) pp. 246–267. (Westview Press: Boulder, CO.)
Lima, S. L. (1995). Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect. Animal Behaviour 49, 11–20.
| Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lima, S. L., and Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619–640.
| Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lima, S. L., and Zollner, P. A. (1996). Anti-predatory vigilance and limits to collective detection of predatory attack: spatial and visual separation between foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38, 355–363.
| Anti-predatory vigilance and limits to collective detection of predatory attack: spatial and visual separation between foragers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McPhee, M. E., Ribbeck, A. E., and Johnston, R. E. (2009). Male Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are more reactive than females to a visual predator cue. Journal of Ethology 27, 137–141.
| Male Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are more reactive than females to a visual predator cue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nonacs, P., and Dill, L. M. (1990). Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 50, 473–477.
Powell, G. V. N. (1974). Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Animal Behaviour 22, 501–505.
| Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pöysä, H. (1987). Costs and benefits of group foraging in the Teal (Anas crecca). Behaviour 103, 123–140.
| Costs and benefits of group foraging in the Teal (Anas crecca).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pulliam, H. R. (1973). On the advantages of flocking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38, 419–422.
| On the advantages of flocking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE3s7jt1OjsA%3D%3D&md5=dd858fabb5e9004e1416cc90d367c2c7CAS |
Quenette, P.-Y. (1990). Functions of vigilance in mammals: a review. Acta Oecologica 11, 801–818.
Rieucau, G., and Martin, J. G. A. (2008). Many eyes or many ewes: vigilance tactics in female Bighorn Sheep Ovis canadensis vary according to reproductive status. Oikos 117, 501–506.
| Many eyes or many ewes: vigilance tactics in female Bighorn Sheep Ovis canadensis vary according to reproductive status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rosier, R. L., and Langkilde, T. (2011). Behavior under risk: how animals avoid becoming dinner. Nature Education Knowledge 2, 8.
Schmidt, K. A., Eunice, L., Ostfeld, R. S., and Sieving, K. (2008). Eastern Chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls. Behavioral Ecology 19, 759–763.
| Eastern Chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, T. (1994). Grouping behaviour in the Peaceful Dove Geopelia striata placida. B.Sc.(Hons) Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville.
Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986). ‘Foraging Theory.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)
Todd, I. A., and Cowie, R. J. (1990). Measuring the risk of predation in an energy currency: field experiments with foraging Blue Tits, Parus caeruleus. Animal Behaviour 40, 112–117.
| Measuring the risk of predation in an energy currency: field experiments with foraging Blue Tits, Parus caeruleus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Treherne, J. E., and Foster, W. A. (1981). Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: the Trafalgar effect. Animal Behaviour 29, 911–917.
| Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: the Trafalgar effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tsurim, I., Kenward, R. E., Gilad, A., Elazary, S., and Abramsky, Z. (2010). Foraging behavior of an urban bird species: molt gaps, distance to shelter, and predation risk. Ecology 91, 233–241.
| Foraging behavior of an urban bird species: molt gaps, distance to shelter, and predation risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wallraff, H. G. (2004). Avian olfactory navigation: its empirical foundation and conceptual state. Animal Behaviour 67, 189–204.
| Avian olfactory navigation: its empirical foundation and conceptual state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittingham, M. J., and Evans, K. L. (2004). The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146, 210–220.
| The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittingham, M. J., Devereux, C. L., Evans, A. D., and Bradbury, R. B. (2006). Alter perceived predation risk and food availability: management prescriptions to benefit farmland birds on stubble fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 640–650.
| Alter perceived predation risk and food availability: management prescriptions to benefit farmland birds on stubble fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, E. O. (1975). ‘Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, UK.)