Reducing effects of trawl fishing on seabirds by limiting foraging opportunities provided by fishery waste
Johanna P. Pierre A E , Edward R. Abraham B , John Cleal C and David A. J. Middleton D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Marine Conservation Services, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand. Present address: Johanna Pierre Environmental Consulting Ltd, PO Box 35122, Lower Hutt 5041, New Zealand.
B Dragonfly Ltd, PO Box 27535, Wellington 6141, New Zealand.
C FV Management Services Ltd, PO Box 1279, Nelson, New Zealand.
D New Zealand Seafood Industry Council Ltd, Private Bag 24-901, Wellington 6142, New Zealand.
E Corresponding author. Email: johannapierre@yahoo.com, johanna@jpec.co.nz
Emu 112(3) 244-254 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU12002
Submitted: 6 January 2012 Accepted: 16 May 2012 Published: 21 August 2012
Abstract
By-catch of seabirds on trawl-fishing gear has been reported worldwide, and is exacerbated by the discharge of fisheries waste. We compared the attraction of seabirds to three forms of fishery waste – unprocessed discharge (offal, fish discards), hashed discharge (smaller chunks passed through a hasher pump) and cutter pump discharge (waste passed through the hasher and a cutter pump to further reduce particle size) – to identify the discharge form that most effectively reduced the risk of seabird by-catch. Seabird responses measured within specified areas astern of the vessel were the abundance of: large albatrosses (Diomedea spp.), small albatrosses and giant-petrels (Thalassarche spp.; Southern Giant-Petrels, Macronectes giganteus; and Northern Giant-Petrels, M. halli), Cape Petrels (Daption capense) and all other procellariid species. Seabirds on the water were less numerous during cutter pump and hashed discharge relative to unprocessed discharge (except small albatrosses – cutter treatment). Also, in some cases, the total number of birds decreased, relative to unprocessed discharge treatments (but not small and large albatrosses – cutter treatment). Particle size may be less important for reducing abundances than temporal discharge patterns, which affected how birds tracked the discharge stream. Manipulating discharge characteristics can reduce seabird attraction to fishing vessels. However, the risk of by-catch remained lowest when no discharging occurred.
Additional keywords: albatross, by-catch, offal discharge, petrel, procellariid, Procellariiformes.
References
Abraham, E. R., and Kennedy, A. (2008). Seabird warp strike in the southern squid trawl fishery, 2004–05. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report 16, Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington.Abraham, E. R., and Thompson, F. N. (2009a). Warp strike in New Zealand trawl fisheries, 2004–05 to 2006–07. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report 33, Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington.
Abraham, E. R., and Thompson, F. N. (2009b). Capture of protected species in New Zealand trawl and longline fisheries, 1998–99 to 2006–07. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report 32, Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington.
Abraham, E. R., Pierre, J. P., Middleton, D. A. J., Cleal, J., Walker, N. A., and Waugh, S. M. (2009). Effectiveness of fish waste management strategies in reducing seabird attendance at a trawl vessel. Fisheries Research 95, 210–219.
| Effectiveness of fish waste management strategies in reducing seabird attendance at a trawl vessel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bartumeus, F., Giuggioli, L., Louzao, M., Bretagnolle, V., Oro, D., and Levin, S. A. (2010). Fishery discards impact on seabird movement patterns at regional scales. Current Biology 20, 215–222.
| Fishery discards impact on seabird movement patterns at regional scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhslSmtbc%3D&md5=f637f56c96ffc81783eb866e35ffc8f2CAS |
Bull, L. S. (2009). New mitigation measures reducing seabird by-catch in trawl fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 10, 408–427.
| New mitigation measures reducing seabird by-catch in trawl fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Croxall, J. P. (2008). Seabird mortality and trawl fisheries. Animal Conservation 11, 255–256.
| Seabird mortality and trawl fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Conservation (2008). Summary of autopsy report for seabirds 1996–2005. Department of Conservation Research and Development Series 291, Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Department of Internal Affairs (2006). Fisheries (commercial) fishing amendment regulations 2006. New Zealand Gazette 33, 842–846.
Favero, M., Blanco, G., Garcia, G., Copello, S., Seco Pon, J. P., Frere, E., Quintana, F., Yorio, P., Rabufetti, F., Canete, G., and Gandini, P. (2011). Seabird mortality associated with ice trawlers in the Patagonian shelf: effect of discards on the occurrence of interactions with fishing gear. Animal Conservation 14, 131–139.
| Seabird mortality associated with ice trawlers in the Patagonian shelf: effect of discards on the occurrence of interactions with fishing gear.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Furness, R. W. (2002). Management implications of interactions between fisheries and sandeel-dependent seabirds and seals in the North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 261–269.
| Management implications of interactions between fisheries and sandeel-dependent seabirds and seals in the North Sea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Furness, R. W., Edwards, A. E., and Oro, D. (2007). Influence of management practices and of scavenging seabirds on availability of fisheries discards to benthic scavengers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 350, 235–244.
| Influence of management practices and of scavenging seabirds on availability of fisheries discards to benthic scavengers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garthe, S., and Scherp, B. (2003). Utilization of discards and offal from commercial fisheries by seabirds in the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60, 980–989.
| Utilization of discards and offal from commercial fisheries by seabirds in the Baltic Sea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gelman, A., Hill, J., and Michael, R. (2006). ‘Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
González-Zevallos, D., and Yorio, P. (2006). Seabird use of discards and incidental captures at the Argentine hake trawl fishery in the Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 316, 175–183.
| Seabird use of discards and incidental captures at the Argentine hake trawl fishery in the Golfo San Jorge, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grémillet, D., Pichegru, L., Kuntz, G., Woakes, A. G., Wilkinson, S., Crawford, R. J. M., and Ryan, P. G. (2008). A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 275, 1149–1156.
| A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffiths, A. M. (1982). Reactions of some seabirds to a ship in the southern ocean. Ostrich 53, 228–235.
| Reactions of some seabirds to a ship in the southern ocean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heidelberger, P., and Welch, P. D. (1983). Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Operations Research 31, 1109–1144.
| Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hilbe, J. M. (2007). ‘Negative Binomial Regression.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Hulsman, K. (1981). Width of gape as a determinant of size of prey eaten by terns. Emu 81, 29–32.
| Width of gape as a determinant of size of prey eaten by terns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IUCN (2012). ‘The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2012.1.’ (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Cambridge, UK.) Available at www.iucnredlist.org [Verified 29 July 2012].
Lecomte, V. J., Sorcib, G., Cornet, S., Jaeger, A., Faivre, B., Arnoux, E., Gaillard, M., Trouvé, C., Besson, D., Chastel, O., and Weimerskirch, H. (2010). Patterns of aging in the long-lived Wandering Albatross. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 6370–6375.
| Patterns of aging in the long-lived Wandering Albatross.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXkslehsb8%3D&md5=f70edc3cfaffa354a3b26af0143fd557CAS |
Melvin, E. F., Dietrich, K. S., Fitzgerald, S., and Cordoza, T. (2010). Reducing seabird strikes with trawl cables in the pollock catcher–processor fleet in the eastern Bering Sea. In ‘Third meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group’, 8–9 April 2010, Mar del Plata, Argentina, SBWG-3 Doc 14 Rev.1. Available at http://www.acap.aq/english/download-document/1380-doc-14-reducing-seabird-strikes-with-trawl-cables [Verified 31 July 2012].
Middleton, D. A. J., and Abraham, E. R. (2007). The efficacy of warp strike mitigation devices: trials in the 2006 squid fishery. Final Research Report IPA2006/02, Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington. Available at http://fs.fish.govt.nz/Page.aspx?pk=113&dk=22910 [Verified 29 July 2012].
Pierre, J. P., Abraham, E. R., Middleton, D. A. J., Cleal, J., Walker, N. A., and Waugh, S. M. (2010). Reducing interactions between seabirds and trawl fisheries: responses to foraging patches provided by fish waste batches. Biological Conservation 143, 2779–2788.
| Reducing interactions between seabirds and trawl fisheries: responses to foraging patches provided by fish waste batches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ronconi, R. A., and Burger, A. E. (2008). Limited foraging flexibility: increased foraging effort by a marine predator does not buffer against scarce prey. Marine Ecology Progress Series 366, 245–258.
| Limited foraging flexibility: increased foraging effort by a marine predator does not buffer against scarce prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson, D. R. (2009). Autopsy report for seabirds killed and returned from observed New Zealand fisheries 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006. Marine Conservation Services Series 2, Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002). ‘Modern Applied Statistics with S.’ 4th edn. (Springer: New York.)
Votier, S. C., Furness, R. W., Bearhop, S., Crane, J. E., Caldow, R. W., Catry, P., Ensor, K., Hamer, K. C., Hudson, A. V., Kalmbach, E., Klomp, N. I., Pfeiffer, S., Phillips, R. A., Prieto, I., and Thompson, D. R. (2004). Changes in fisheries discard rates and seabird communities. Nature 427, 727–730.
| Changes in fisheries discard rates and seabird communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtlajsrs%3D&md5=1ff7b877c0c562041b72f5b2f87aa264CAS |
Watkins, B. P., Petersen, S. L., and Ryan, P. G. (2006). Interactions between seabirds and deep water hake trawl gear: an assessment of impacts in South African waters in 2004/05. Report WG-FSA-06/41, Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, Hobart.
Watkins, B. P., Petersen, S. L., and Ryan, P. G. (2008). Interactions between seabirds and deep-water hake trawl gear: an assessment of impacts in South African waters. Animal Conservation 11, 247–254.
| Interactions between seabirds and deep-water hake trawl gear: an assessment of impacts in South African waters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Xavier, J. C., and Croxall, J. P. (2007). Predator–prey interactions: why do larger albatrosses eat bigger squid? Journal of Zoology 271, 408–417.
| Predator–prey interactions: why do larger albatrosses eat bigger squid?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zimmer, I., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Kato, A., Ancel, A., and Chiaradia, A. (2011). Does foraging performance change with age in female Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor)? PLoS ONE 6, e16098.
| Does foraging performance change with age in female Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1Glu7o%3D&md5=06d068532f44fc136823defe659fa729CAS |