Nesting requirements of the endangered Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor)
Matthew H. Webb A B C , Mark C. Holdsworth A and Janneke Webb AA Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
B Fenner School of Environment and Society, Building 48, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: matthew.webb@dpipwe.tas.gov.au
Emu 112(3) 181-188 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU11014
Submitted: 21 February 2011 Accepted: 31 October 2011 Published: 30 May 2012
Abstract
Declines in avian biodiversity are being reported worldwide. A better understanding of the ecology of many species is fundamental to identifying and addressing threatening processes and developing effective mitigation measures. The Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) is listed as endangered and is an obligate migrant that breeds only in Tasmania, wintering in mainland Australia. The species nests in tree-hollows and forages primarily on flowers of the Tasmanian Blue Gum (Eucalyptus globulus) and Black Gum (Eucalyptus ovata) during the breeding season. Surveys for Swift Parrot nests conducted over three consecutive breeding seasons identified 130 Swift Parrot nests in 117 trees. Sites were between 12 and 130 ha in area with up to 49 nests found at an individual site. Swift Parrot nest-trees were characterised as being large eucalypts (mean diameter at breast height = 105 cm) with five or more potential hollows (mean = 8.6) and showing clear signs of senescence. Reuse of nests was uncommon over the 3 years and the infrequency of reuse was most likely related to poor flowering of Tasmanian Blue Gums around nesting sites in years following recorded nesting. To protect the species, conservation actions need to account for the spatiotemporal variation in the availability of Swift Parrot breeding habitat and recognise there may be several years between the use of a particular site. Given the number of nests found at individual sites this will require the management or reservation of suitable forest stands with old-growth characteristics across the landscape, rather than focussing on individual trees or historical nesting sites.
Additional keywords: hollow-nesting, nectarivore, nest-tree, parrot conservation.
References
Bennett, A. F., Lumsden, L. F., and Nicholls, A. O. (1994). Tree hollows in remnant woodlands, spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 222–235.Brereton, R. (1997). Management prescriptions for the Swift Parrot in production forests. Report to the Tasmanian RFA Environment and Heritage Technical Committee. Joint Commonwealth and Tasmania RFA Steering Committee, 1997, Hobart, Tas.
Brereton, R., Mallick, S. A., and Kennedy, S. J. (2004). Foraging preferences of Swift Parrot on Tasmanian Blue-Gum: tree size, flowering frequency and flowering intensity. Emu 104, 377–383.
| Foraging preferences of Swift Parrot on Tasmanian Blue-Gum: tree size, flowering frequency and flowering intensity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Breslow, N. E., and Day, N. E. (Eds) (1980). Statistical models in cancer research. Vol. 1. The Analysis of Case Control Studies. Scientific Publication 32 (International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France.)
Brown, P. B. (1989). The Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor (White): a report on its ecology, distribution and status, including management considerations. Prepared for the Australian Heritage Commission. Department of Lands Parks and Wildlife, Hobart, Tas.
Commonwealth of Australia and State of Tasmania (1996). Tasmanian-Commonwealth Regional Forest Agreement Background Report Part C Environment and Heritage Report Vol II. (Tasmanian Public Land Use Commission in conjunction with Commonwealth Forests Taskforce: Hobart, Tas.)
Department of Primary Industries Parks, Water and Environment (2009). TASVEG 2.0. Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program. Available at http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/Attachments/LJEM-7TB8XH/$FILE/TASVEG%202.0%20Metadata%20and%20Release%20Notes.pdf [Verified 29 February 2012].
Garnett, S. T., and Crowley, G. M. (2000). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000.’ (Environment Australia: Canberra.)
Gibbons, P., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2002). ‘Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Harper, M. J., McCarthy, M. A., and van der Ree, R. (2005). The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development. Biological Conservation 122, 181–192.
| The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harris, S., and Kitchener, A. (Eds) (2005). ‘From Forest to Fjaeldmark: Descriptions of Tasmania’s Vegetation.’ (Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania: Hobart.)
Inions, G. B., Tanton, M. T., and Davey, S. M. (1989). Effect of fire on the availability of hollows in trees used by Common Brushtail Possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr, 1793, and the Ringtail Possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 449–458.
| Effect of fire on the availability of hollows in trees used by Common Brushtail Possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr, 1793, and the Ringtail Possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson, J., and Munks, S. (1998). ‘Threatened Fauna Manual for Production Forests in Tasmania.’ Revised edn. (Forest Practices Board: Hobart, Tas.)
Jacobs, M. R. (1955). ‘Growth Habits of the Eucalypts.’ (Forest Timber Bureau Australia: Canberra.)
Koch, A. J., Driscoll, D. A., and Kirkpatrick, J. B. (2008). Estimating the accuracy of tree ageing methods in mature Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania. Australian Forestry 71, 147–159.
Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Pope, M. L., Gibbons, P., and Donnelly, C. F. (2000). Cavity sizes and types in Australian eucalypts from wet and dry forest types – a simple of rule of thumb for estimating size and number of cavities. Forest Ecology and Management 137, 139–150.
| Cavity sizes and types in Australian eucalypts from wet and dry forest types – a simple of rule of thumb for estimating size and number of cavities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mac Nally, R., and McGoldrick, J. M. (1997). Landscape dynamics of bird communities in relation to mass flowering in some eucalypt forests of central Victoria, Australia. Journal of Avian Biology 28, 171–183.
| Landscape dynamics of bird communities in relation to mass flowering in some eucalypt forests of central Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mallick, S., James, D., Brereton, R., and Plowright, S. (2004). Blue-gums Eucalyptus globulus in north-west Tasmania: an important food resource for the endangered Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor. Victorian Naturalist 101, 36–46.
Manning, A. D., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Barry, S. C. (2004). The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural ‘matrix’: a case study of the vulnerable Superb Parrot of south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 120, 363–374.
| The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural ‘matrix’: a case study of the vulnerable Superb Parrot of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Munks, S., Richards, K., Meggs, J., and Brereton, R. (2004). The importance of adaptive management in ‘off-reserve’ conservation for forest fauna: implementing, monitoring and upgrading Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor conservation measures in Tasmania. In ‘Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna’. 2nd edn. (Ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 688–698. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)
Saunders, D. A., Smith, G. T., and Rowley, I. (1982). The availability and dimensions of tree hollows that provide nest sites for cockatoos (Psittaciformes) in Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 541–556.
| The availability and dimensions of tree hollows that provide nest sites for cockatoos (Psittaciformes) in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swift Parrot Recovery Team (2001). Swift Parrot recovery plan. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Hobart.
van der Ree, R., Bennett, A. F., and Soderquist, T. R. (2006). Nest-tree selection by the threatened Brush-tailed Phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape. Wildlife Research 33, 113–119.
| Nest-tree selection by the threatened Brush-tailed Phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams, K., and Potts, B. M. (1996). The natural distribution of Eucalyptus species in Tasmania. TASforests 8, 39–164.