Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Breeding ecology of an Australian estrildid, the Long-tailed Finch (Poephila acuticauda)

Erica P. van Rooij A B and Simon C. Griffith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, 209 Culloden Road, Marsfield, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: ericavanrooij@mail.com

Emu 111(4) 297-303 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU10092
Submitted: 23 December 2010  Accepted: 30 March 2011   Published: 13 October 2011

Abstract

We studied the breeding ecology of the Long-tailed Finch (Poephila acuticauda) over three seasons between 2008 and 2010 in the Kimberley region, Western Australia. Breeding took place from February to September, with a peak in laying in March–April. Pairs produced up to three successful broods per season with a mean (±s.e.) clutch-size of 4.66 ± 1.13, mean broods of 3.98 ± 1.10 young, and an average of 3.87 ± 1.10 fledged young per successful nest. Nesting failure occurred frequently, with 66.2% of breeding attempts failing to fledge any offspring. In nests where at least one egg hatched (47% of nests), 87 ± 17% of the eggs hatched. In successful nests, 98 ± 9% of all nestlings fledged. Annual breeding success was relatively consistent over the three breeding seasons, with 26.8–40.8% of all eggs resulting in fledged young. Successful nesting attempts lasted an average of 39 ± 3.3 days, with both parents contributing to incubation (duration 13.6 ± 2.3 days) and brooding and feeding during the nestling period (duration 20.6 ± 2 days). Site- and mate-fidelity were high, with pairs staying together during and between breeding seasons and 60% of pairs breeding in the same area in a subsequent year.

Additional keywords: clutch, grass finch, hatch, mate-fidelity, reproductive ecology, site philopatry.


References

BirdLife International (2009). Poephila acuticauda (Long-tailed Finch). In ‘IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1’. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/149398/0 [Verified 26 November 2010].

Boles, W. E. (1988). Comments on the subspecies of Australian native and introduced finches. Emu 88, 20–24.
Comments on the subspecies of Australian native and introduced finches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brazill-Boast, J., Pryke, S. R., and Griffith, S. C. (2010). Nest-site utilisation and niche overlap in two sympatric, cavity-nesting finches. Emu 110, 170–177.
Nest-site utilisation and niche overlap in two sympatric, cavity-nesting finches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brazill-Boast, J., van Rooij, E. P., Pryke, S. R., and Griffith, S. C. (2011). Interference from Long-tailed Finches constrains reproduction in the endangered Gouldian Finch. Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 39–48.
Interference from Long-tailed Finches constrains reproduction in the endangered Gouldian Finch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooney, S. J. N., and Watson, D. M. (2005). Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata) preferentially nest in mistletoe. Emu 105, 317–322.
Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata) preferentially nest in mistletoe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dostine, P. L., and Franklin, D. C. (2002). A comparison of the diet of three finch species in the Yinberrie Hills area, Northern Territory. Emu 102, 159–164.
A comparison of the diet of three finch species in the Yinberrie Hills area, Northern Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elie, J. E., Mariette, M. M., Soula, H. A., Griffith, S. C., Mathevon, N., and Vignal, C. (2010). Vocal communication at the nest between mates in wild Zebra Finches: a private vocal duet? Animal Behaviour 80, 597–605.
Vocal communication at the nest between mates in wild Zebra Finches: a private vocal duet?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffith, S. C., and Buchanan, K. (2010). The Zebra Finch: the ultimate Australian supermodel. Emu 110, v–xii.
The Zebra Finch: the ultimate Australian supermodel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffith, S. C., Pryke, S. R., and Mariette, M. (2008). Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research. Emu 108, 311–319.
Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffith, S. C., Holleley, C. E., Mariette, M. M., Pryke, S. R., and Svedin, N. (2010). Low level of extrapair parentage in wild Zebra Finches. Animal Behaviour 79, 261–264.
Low level of extrapair parentage in wild Zebra Finches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Cowling, S. J. (Eds) (2006). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 7: Boatbill to Starlings.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Immelmann, K. (1965). ‘Australian Finches in Bush and Aviary.’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney.)

Jennings, W. B., and Edwards, S. V. (2005). Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution 59, 2033–2047.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFGiurnM&md5=cb4526e1a5a305d1f72292a3c9ff1b79CAS |

Keast, A. (1958). Intraspecific variation in the Australian finches. Emu 58, 219–246.
Intraspecific variation in the Australian finches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lack, D. (1966). ‘Population Studies of Birds.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Langmore, N. E., and Bennett, A. T. D. (1999). Strategic concealment of sexual identity in an estrildid finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 266, 543–550.
Strategic concealment of sexual identity in an estrildid finch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGuire, A., and Kleindorfer, S. (2007). Nesting success and apparent nest-adornment in Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata). Emu 107, 44–51.
Nesting success and apparent nest-adornment in Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Møller, A. P. (1989). Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos 56, 421–423.
Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pearce, D., Pryke, S. R., and Griffith, S. C. (2011). Interspecific aggression for nest sites: model experiments with Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda) and endangered Gouldian Finches (Erythrura gouldiae). Auk 128, 497–505.
Interspecific aggression for nest sites: model experiments with Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda) and endangered Gouldian Finches (Erythrura gouldiae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Development Core Team (2010). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified 26 September 2011].

Stirnemann, I., Johnston, G., Rich, B., Robertson, J., and Kleindorfer, S. (2009). Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) response and bill-hue wavelength increase with carotenoid supplementation in Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata). Emu 109, 344–351.
Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) response and bill-hue wavelength increase with carotenoid supplementation in Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tidemann, S. C., and Woinarski, J. C. Z. (1994). Moult characteristics and breeding seasons of Gouldian Erythrura gouldiae, Masked Poephila personata and Long-tailed Finches P. acuticauda in savannah woodland in the Northern Territory. Emu 94, 46–52.
Moult characteristics and breeding seasons of Gouldian Erythrura gouldiae, Masked Poephila personata and Long-tailed Finches P. acuticauda in savannah woodland in the Northern Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tidemann, S. C., Boyden, J., Elvish, R., Elvish, J., and O’Gorman, B. (1992). Comparison of the breeding sites and habitat of two hole-nesting estrildid finches, one endangered, in northern Australia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8, 373–388.
Comparison of the breeding sites and habitat of two hole-nesting estrildid finches, one endangered, in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Rooij, E. P., and Griffith, S. C. (2009). First record of cooperative breeding in an Australian estrildid, the Long-tailed Finch (Poephila acuticauda). Emu 109, 63–65.
First record of cooperative breeding in an Australian estrildid, the Long-tailed Finch (Poephila acuticauda).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Rooij, E. P., and Griffith, S. C. (2010). Are monomorphic species really sexually indistinguishable: no evidence in wild Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda). Ethology 116, 929–940.
Are monomorphic species really sexually indistinguishable: no evidence in wild Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., and Tidemann, S. (1992). Survivorship and some population parameters for the endangered Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae and two other finch species at two sites in tropical northern Australia. Emu 92, 33–38.
Survivorship and some population parameters for the endangered Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae and two other finch species at two sites in tropical northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zann, R. (1977). Pair-bond and bonding behaviour in three species of grassfinches of the genus Poephila (Gould). Emu 77, 97–106.
Pair-bond and bonding behaviour in three species of grassfinches of the genus Poephila (Gould).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zann, R. (1994). Reproduction in a Zebra Finch colony in south-eastern Australia: the significance of monogamy, precocial breeding and multiple broods in a highly mobile species. Emu 94, 285–299.
Reproduction in a Zebra Finch colony in south-eastern Australia: the significance of monogamy, precocial breeding and multiple broods in a highly mobile species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zann, R. A. (1996). ‘The Zebra Finch: a Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)