Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mercury levels in the feathers of breeding seabirds in the Seychelles, western Indian Ocean, from 1996 to 2005

Jaime A. Ramos A C and Paula C. Tavares B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Marine Research (IMAR/CMA), Department of Life Sciences, Apartado 3046, University of Coimbra, PT-3001-401 Coimbra, Portugal.

B Deceased, formerly of CVRM/Geo-Systems Centre, Departamento Minas, Instituto Superior Técnico, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, PT-1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.

C Corresponding author. Email: jramos@ci.uc.pt

Emu 110(1) 87-91 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09055
Submitted: 18 June 2009  Accepted: 4 December 2009   Published: 24 February 2010

Abstract

We analysed mercury levels in the breast feathers of several breeding seabirds – White-tailed Tropicbird (Phaethon lepturus), Audubon’s Shearwater (Puffinus lherminieri), Lesser Noddy (Anous tenuirostris), White Tern (Gygis alba), Sooty Tern (Onychoprion fuscata) and Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii) – on Aride Island in the Seychelles during three periods between 1996 and 2005. Mercury concentrations tended to be higher in the second sampling period (2002–03) than the first (1996–97), particularly for inshore-feeding species. El Niño events in 1997–99 and 2002–03 might help to explain this pattern, through an increase in mercury bioavailability for seabirds that forage inshore. However, levels of mercury in tissue decreased significantly from the first period (1996–97) to the third period (2004–05) for inshore-foraging species (Lesser Noddy mean ± s.e.: 0.82 ± 0.02 μg g–1 v. 0.53 ± 0.06 μg g–1 respectively) and more wide-ranging, offshore-feeding species (Sooty Tern: 1.16 ± 0.05 v. 0.59 ± 0.04; White-tailed Tropicbird: 1.82 ± 0.05 v. 1.43 ± 0.09). Wide-ranging species of seabirds are more likely to be useful bioindicators at large spatial scales, with such species suggesting a decreasing trend in mercury pollution in the western Indian Ocean.

Additional keywords: aseasonal breeding seabirds, inshore-feeding seabirds, mercury pollution, offshore-feeding seabirds, tropical seabirds.


Acknowledgements

We thank James Cadbury for financial travel assistance to J. A. Ramos and the Island Conservation Society for permission to work on Aride Island. John Bowler provided helpful comments on a draft. This research was conducted under permission of the Seychelles Bureau of Standards, Republic of Seychelles. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Paula Tavares (1972–2009).


References

Bailey, R. S. (1968). The pelagic distribution of sea-birds in the western Indian Ocean. Ibis 110, 493–519.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | MEI (2009). Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI) – bimonthly MEI values. (Earth System Research Laboratory, Physical Sciences Division, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), US Department of Commerce: Boulder, CO) Available at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/klaus.wolter/MEI/table.html [Verified June 2009].

Monteiro, L. R. , and Furness, R. W. (1995). Seabirds as monitors of mercury in the marine environment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80, 851–870.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Schreiber E. A. , and Burger J. (2001). ‘Biology of Marine Birds.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Spencer, T. , Teleki, K. A. , Bradshaw, C. , and Spalding, M. D. (2000). Coral bleaching in the southern Seychelles during the 1997–1998 Indian Ocean Warm Event. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 569–586.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | UNESCAP (2006). Asia-Pacific in Figures 2006. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), Bangkok, Thailand. Available at http://www.unescap.org/Stat/data/apif/2006/india-apif2006.pdf [Verified 31 January 2010].

Wilson, S. J. , Steenhuisen, F. , Pacyna, J. M. , and Pacyna, E. G. (2006). Mapping the spatial distribution of global anthropogenic mercury atmospheric emission inventories. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4621–4632.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |