The coevolutionary arms race between Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoos and Superb Fairy-wrens
N. E. Langmore A C and R. M. Kilner BA Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
B Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
C Corresponding author. Email: naomi.langmore@anu.edu.au
Emu 110(1) 32-38 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09032
Submitted: 30 April 2009 Accepted: 21 September 2009 Published: 18 February 2010
Abstract
Brood parasitism by cuckoos imposes high reproductive costs on hosts, selecting for the evolution of host defences. Cuckoos retaliate by evolving counter-adaptations to host defences, giving rise to a coevolutionary arms race between cuckoos and their hosts. Here we review the observational and experimental evidence for a coevolutionary arms race between Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoos (Chalcites basalis) and Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). We present evidence that the arms race has reached a uniquely advanced stage in this cuckoo–host pair; mimicry of host chicks by cuckoos has evolved in response to rejection of cuckoo chicks by hosts. We discuss the escalation of the arms race between these species in relation to the evolution of defence portfolios. Defences evolved by hosts are not only dependent on attributes of the cuckoo, but are also dependent on the success of other behaviours in host-defence portfolios. Thus, Superb Fairy-wrens rely heavily on rejection of cuckoo chicks, even though it is the costliest possible line of defence, because Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoos can usually breach the cheaper defences against parasitism mounted earlier in the breeding attempt.
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Butchart, A. Cockburn, S. Cooney, N. Davies, J. Gardner, M. Hall, S. Hunt, R. Heinsohn, G. Maurer, J. Madden, A. Peters and A. Russell for invaluable help in the field and stimulating discussions. Our research on Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoos and Superb Fairy-wrens was generously funded by the Australian Research Council, The Leverhulme Trust and The Royal Society. We are very grateful for their support.
Bártol, I. , Karcza, Z. , Moskát, C. , Røskaft, E. , and Kisbenedek, T. (2002). Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry. Journal of Avian Biology 33, 420–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies, N. B. , and Brooke, M. de L. (1988). Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counter-adaptations. Animal Behaviour 36, 262–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbs, H. L. , Sorenson, M. D. , Marchetti, K. , Brooke, M. D. , Davies, N. B. , and Nakamura, H. (2000). Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo. Nature 407, 183–186.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Payne, R. B. , Payne, L. L. , and Rowley, I. (1985). Splendid wren Malurus splendens response to cuckoos: an experimental test of social organization in a communal bird. Behaviour 94, 108–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sato, N. J. , Tokue, K. , Noske, R. A. , Mikami, O. K. , and Ueda, K. (2009). Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biology Letters ,In press
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Takasu, F. (1998a). Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 969–987.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Takasu, F. (1998b). Why do all host species not show defense against avian brood parasitism: evolutionary lag or equilibrium? American Naturalist 151, 193–205.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Welbergen, J. A. , and Davies, N. B. (2009). Variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Current Biology 19, 235–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Yasukawa, K. , and Cockburn, A. (2009). Antipredator vigilance in cooperatively breeding Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Auk 126, 147–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |