Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU09028
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 109(3)

First report of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) in wild Red-fronted Parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) in New Zealand

Luis Ortiz-Catedral A E , Kate McInnes B , Mark E. Hauber C D and Dianne H. Brunton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ecology and Conservation Lab, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland Campus, Private Bag 102904, North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.

B Department of Conservation, Conservation House (Whare Kaupapa Atawhai), 18–32 Manners Street, 6011 Wellington, New Zealand.

C School of Biological Sciences, 3a Symonds Street, Thomas Building, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

D Department of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: l.ortiz-catedral@massey.ac.nz

Emu 109(3) 244-247 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09028
Submitted: 1 April 2009  Accepted: 13 July 2009   Published: 25 August 2009

Abstract

Psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD) is a highly infectious and potentially fatal viral disease of parrots and their allies caused by the beak and feather disease virus (BFDV). Abnormal feather morphology and loss of feathers are common clinical symptoms of the disease. PBFD also damages the lymphoid tissue and affected birds may die as a result of secondary bacterial or fungal infections. The disease is therefore of concern for conservation biologists and wildlife managers, as it is immunosuppressive and can become an additional threatening factor among critically endangered psittacines. We conducted a PCR-based screening for BFDV in a wild population of the Red-fronted Parakeet (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) on Little Barrier Island, New Zealand, during a translocation of this species. Fifty-four parakeets were captured and feather samples collected for molecular screening. We detected BFDV DNA from 15 individuals, but only two showed external signs attributable to PBFD, namely abnormal feather morphology or colouration, loss of feathers and haemorrhagic feathers. Our survey represents the first positive identification of BFDV in wild New Zealand endemic psittacines and confirms the risk of spread of the virus between wild populations within this global hotspot of endemic psittacine diversity.

Additional keywords: PBFD, parrot, pathogen, translocation.


Acknowledgements

This research was completed with the logistical and financial support of the New Zealand Department of Conservation, Massey University, The University of Auckland, Motuihe Island Trust and National Council of Science from Mexico (CONACYT). We thank volunteers for assisting with collection of samples on Little Barrier Island. We also thank Jenny Cahill and Michelle Houston from the Equine Parentage and Animal Genetic Services Centre, Massey University, for their advice and help in processing the samples. This research was conducted under full approval of the New Zealand Department of Conservation (permits AK-15300-RES, AK-20666-FAU and AK-22857-FAU) and Massey University Animal Ethics Committee (protocols MUAEC 07/138 and 08/24).


References

Gerlach H. (1994). Circoviridae-psittacine beak and feather disease virus. In ‘Avian Medicine: Principles and Practice’. (Eds B. W. Ritchie, G. T. Harrison and L. R. Harrison.) pp. 894–903. (Wingers Publishing Incorporation: Lake Worth, FL.)

Griffiths, R. , Double, M. C. , Orr, K. , and Dawson, R. J. G. (1998). A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 7, 1071–1075.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Ha J. J. (2005). The prevalence of psittacine Circovirus in native and exotic parrots in New Zealand. M.Sc. Thesis, Massey Unversity, Palmerston North, NZ.

Ha, H. J. , Anderson, I. L. , Alley, M. R. , Springett, B. P. , and Gartrell, B. D. (2007). The prevalence of beak and feather disease virus infection in wild populations of parrots and cockatoos in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 55, 235–238.
|  CAS | PubMed | Higgins P. J. (Ed.) (1999). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Hill R. (2002). Recovery plan for the Norfolk Island Green Parrot Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae cookii. Natural Heritage Trust, Canberra. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/norfolk-green-parrot/pubs/norfolk-green-parrot.pdf [Verified 11 August 2009].

Hitchmough R. (2002). ‘New Zealand Threat Classification System Lists 2002.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington.)

Juniper A. T. , and Parr M. 1998. ‘Parrots: a Guide to the Parrots of the World.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.)

Khalesi, B. , Bonne, N. , Stewart, M. , Sharp, M. , and Raidal, S. (2005). A comparison of haemagglutination, haemagglutination inhibition and PCR for the detection of psittacine beak and feather disease virus infection and comparison of isolates obtained from loriids. Journal of General Virology 86, 3039–3046.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Malham J. , Kovac E. , Reuleaux A. , Linnebjerg J. F. , Tollington S. , Raisin C. , Marsh P. , and McPherson S. (2008). Results of screening Echo and Ringneck Parakeets for psittacine beak and feather disease in Mauritius March 2008. Report to the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation; National Parks and Conservation Service of Mauritius; International Zoo Veterinary Group; Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust; IBL Aviation, Shipping and Other Services; Chester Zoo; and the World Parrot Trust.

Paré J. A. , and Robert N. (2007). Circovirus. In ‘Infectious Diseases in Wild Birds’. (Eds N. J. Thomas, D. B. Hunter and C. T. Atkinson.) (Blackwell Publishing: Melbourne.)

Pass, D. A. , and Perry, R. A. (1984). The pathology of psittacine beak and feather disease. Australian Veterinary Journal 61, 69–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Ritchie B. W. , Gregory C. R. , Latimer K. S. , Campagnoli R. P. , Pesti D. , Ciembor P. , Rae M. , Reed H. H. , et al (2003 b). Documentation of a PBFD virus variant and its importance to PBFD testing. In ‘2003 Proceedings of the International Aviculturists Society. Parrots: perspectives and solutions from aviculture and field conservation’, 15–19 January 2003, Tennessee. Available at http://www.funnyfarmexotics.com/IAS/2003Proceedings/Ritchie_PBFDvarient.pdf [Verified 30 July 2009].

Sainsbury, J. P. , Greene, T. C. , Moorhouse, R. J. , Daugherty, C. H. , and Chambers, G. K. (2006). Microsatellite analysis reveals substantial levels of genetic variation but low levels of genetic divergence among isolated populations of Kaka (Nestor meridionalis). Emu 106, 329–338.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |

Todd, D. (2000). Circoviruses: immunosuppressive threats to avian species: a review. Avian Pathology 29, 373–394.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

Tomasek, O. , and Tukac, V. (2007). Psittacine circovirus infection in parakeets of the genus Eunymphicus and treatment with β-(1,3/1,6)-D-Glucan. Avian Diseases 51, 989–991.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |