Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU08065
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 109(2)

Social organisation and foraging ecology of the cooperatively breeding Chestnut-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps)

Dean J. Portelli A , Holly Barclay B , Deborah J. F. Russell C , Simon C. Griffith D and Andrew F. Russell C D E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

B Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

C Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

D Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: a.f.russell@sheffield.ac.uk

Emu 109(2) 153-162 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU08065
Submitted: 24 November 2008  Accepted: 4 April 2009   Published: 10 June 2009

Abstract

An individual’s fitness is assumed to be maximised through early dispersal and independent breeding. However, offspring across a diversity of taxonomic groups delay dispersal and remain with at least one of their parents after reaching sexual maturity. Delayed dispersal and resulting family living are expected to arise when constraints exist on independent reproduction and where offspring benefit by remaining philopatric. A first step to elucidating the nature of such constraints and benefits for a given species is to have an understanding of the social organisation and habitat preferences of a species. The present study examined the social organisation, foraging preferences and characteristics of preferred foraging areas during a breeding season in the cooperatively breeding Chestnut-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps). During the study, groups of Babblers bred plurally in breeding units of two to 13 adults that occupied non-exclusive home-ranges averaging 38 ha, with larger groups occupying larger ranges. Babblers spent most of the day foraging, mostly on the ground, and preferred to forage within drainage zones. The preference for such zones probably arose because they offered both greater vegetative cover from aerial predators and biomasses of potential prey. These findings lead to the prediction that the availability of drainage zones within a group’s range will influence offspring dispersal decisions in Chestnut-crowned Babblers at the site studied.

Additional keywords: benefits of philopatry, ecological constraints, home-range, plural breeding.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr David Croft and Zane Turner at Fowlers Gap for their invaluable support and logistical help during this study, and to the University of New South Wales for permitting the work to be carried out at their field station. Lucy Browning, Peter Cale, Kazu Eguchi, Richard Kingsford, Enrico Sorato and Sarah Taylor helped with the manuscript. This work was conducted with approval from the UNSW Animal Care and Ethics Committee (04–63A) and Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme (Project Number 422). D. J. Portelli, H. Barclay and D. J. F. Russell conducted components of this study in partial fulfilment of B.Sc. (Hons) degrees at the University of New South Wales (Australia), the University of Cambridge and the University of Sheffield (UK), respectively. A. F. Russell was funded by the Royal Society (UK), the Natural Environment Research Council (UK) and the Australian Research Council.


References

Arnold, K. E. , and Owens, I. P. F. (1999). Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecology. Behavioral Ecology 10, 465–471.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | AUSLIG (1990). ‘Atlas of Australian Resources. Third Series. Volume 6: Vegetation.’ (Division of National Mapping, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.)

Balda, R. B. , and Brown, J. L. (1977). Notes on the behaviour of Hall’s Babbler. Emu 77, 111–114.
Barrett G. , Silcocks A. , Barry S. , Cunningham R. , and Poulter R. (2003). ‘The New Atlas of Australian Birds.’ (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union: Melbourne.)

Bell, H. L. , and Ford, H. A. (1986). A comparison of the social organization of three syntopic species of Australian thornbill, Acanthiza. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19, 381–392.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Blackmore C. J. (2006). Breeding biology and behaviour of the Grey-crowned Babbler. Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Blackmore, C. J. , and Heinsohn, R. G. (2008). Variable mating strategies and incest avoidance in cooperative breeding Grey-crowned Babbler. Animal Behaviour 75, 63–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown J. L. (1987). ‘Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Brown, J. L. , and Balda, R. P. (1977). The relationship of habitat quality to group size in Hall’s Babbler (Pomatostomus halli). Condor 79, 312–320.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown J. L. , and Brown E. R. (1990). Mexican jays: uncooperative breeding. In ‘Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Evolution’. (Eds P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig.) pp. 269–288. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Brown, J. L. , Dow, D. D. , Brown, E. R. , and Brown, S. L. (1983). Socio-ecology of the Grey-crowned Babbler: population structure, unit size and vegetation correlates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13, 115–124.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cunningham G. M. , Mulham W. E. , Milthorpe P. L. , and Leigh J. H. (1981). ‘Plants of Western New South Wales.’ (NSW Government Printing Office: Sydney.)

Dickinson, J. L. , and McGowan, A. (2005). Resource wealth drives family group living in western bluebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 272, 2423–2428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Du Plessis M. A. (2004). Physiological ecology. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds’. (Eds W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson.) pp. 117–127. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Eguchi, K. , Yamaguchi, N. , Ueda, K. , Nagata, H. , Takagi, M. , and Noske, R. (2007). Social structure and helping behaviour of grey-crowned babbler Pomatostomus temporalis. Journal of Ornithology 148, 203–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ekman J. , Dickinson J. L. , Hatchwell B. J. , and Griesser M. (2004). Delayed dispersal. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds’. (Eds W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson.) pp. 35–47. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Hatchwell, B. J. , and Komdeur, J. (2000). Ecological constraints, life-history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour 59, 1079–1086.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Higgins P. J. , and Peter J. M. (Eds) (2002). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 6: Pardalotes to Shrike-thrushes.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

King, B. R. (1980). Social organisation and behaviour of the Grey-crowned Babbler, Pomatostomus temporalis. Emu 80, 59–76.
Mabbutt J. A. , Burrell J. P. , Corbett J. R. , and Sullivan M. E. (1973). Land systems of Fowlers Gap Station. Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station, Research Series 3, pp. 25–43. University of New South Wales.

Moffatt J. D. (1982). Territoriality and use of space in Grey-crowned Babblers, Pomatostomus temporalis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, St Lucia.

Oppenheimer S. (2005). Endocrine correlates of social and reproductive behaviours in a group-living Australian passerine, the White-browed Babbler. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Ostro, L. E. T. , Young, T. P. , Silver, S. C. , and Koontz, F. W. (1999). A geographic information system method for estimating home range size. Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 748–755.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Portelli D. J. (2005). The socio-ecology of the cooperatively breeding Chestnut-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps). B.Sc. (Hons) Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Rubenstein, D. R. , and Lovette, I. J. (2007). Temporal environmental variability drives the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Current Biology 17, 1414–1419.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Russell A. F. (2004). Mammals: comparisons and contrasts. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds’. (Eds W. D. Koenig and J. L. Dickinson.) pp. 210–227. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Russell, A. F. , and Hatchwell, B. J. (2001). Experimental evidence for kin-biased helping in a cooperatively breeding vertebrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, 2169–2174.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Taylor S. (2003). Habitat use by White-browed Babblers Pomatostomus superciliosus in box-ironbark forests in south-east Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, LaTrobe University, Melbourne.

Walters, J. R. , Copeyon, C. K. , and Carter, J. H. (1992). Test of the ecological basis of cooperative breeding in Red-cockaded Woodpeckers. Auk 109, 90–97.
Williams G. C. (1966). ‘Adaptation and Natural Selection.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)