Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nest-site selection by the Painted Honeyeater (Grantiella picta), a mistletoe specialist

Laurence P. Barea
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Institute of Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

B Present address: Department of Conservation, Waikato Conservancy, Private Bag 3072, Hamilton, New Zealand. Email: Lbarea@doc.govt.nz

Emu 108(3) 213-220 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU07039
Submitted: 3 July 2007  Accepted: 3 July 2008   Published: 8 August 2008

Abstract

The Painted Honeyeater (Grantiella picta) is a migratory to nomadic honeyeater with an extremely specialised diet that is ecologically linked with habitats containing mistletoe, the fruits of which form its primary diet. This paper examines nest-site selection of this little known species at the scale of the nest tree in an effort to understand better its ecological requirements. Ninety-one breeding attempts were observed between October 2004 and February 2006 in or adjacent to Binya State Forest, central New South Wales, Australia, 63 of which are analysed here. Painted Honeyeaters built nests in most of the tree species present in the study site but 78% of nests were in Yarran (Acacia homalophylla), which is the principal host for Grey Mistletoe (Amyema quandang). In total, 46% of all nests were placed in Grey Mistletoe despite its low presence in the environment relative to non-mistletoe arboreal substrates. The prevalence of mistletoe in host trees selected for nests was significantly higher than in randomly sampled hosts and the mean rate of mistletoe parasitism was also significantly higher. Painted Honeyeaters tended to orientate their nests to the north-east, consistent with reducing direct exposure to the afternoon sun, with greater variation being evident for nests placed in mistletoe. Nest trees were significantly taller than randomly sampled trees and the vertical distribution of nests in tree crowns and mistletoe clumps was non-random and suggested that reducing the risk of predation might drive the pattern. When considered holistically, proximity to mistletoe food resources, reduction of predation risk and provision of a suitable microhabitat may interact to produce the pattern of nest-site selection observed in this study. Management actions for this declining species should include maintaining a diverse woodland vegetation community supporting adequate mistletoe populations over the long-term.

Additional keywords: threatened species, nest orientation, resources, habitat selection, specialist.


Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award to Laurence P. Barea and a Charles Sturt University competitive grant awarded to David M. Watson. Field work was conducted under Charles Sturt University Animal Ethics Committee approval No. 05/065 and NSW Parks and Wildlife Service Scientific Licence No. S11461. David M. Watson, Gary Luck and Hugh Ford provided valuable comments which improved earlier drafts of this manuscript. David Webb and Karolina Petrovic are thanked for their assistance with some of the data collection. Four anonymous referees provided comments that improved an earlier version of the manuscript.


References

Barea, L. P. , and Watson, D. M. (2007). Temporal variation in food resources determines onset of breeding in an Australian mistletoe specialist. Emu 107, 203–209.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Batschelet E. (1981). ‘Circular Statistics in Biology.’ (Academic Press: London.)

Bergin, T. M. (1991). A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for analysis of nest orientation in Western Kingbirds (Tyrannus verticalis). Condor 93, 164–171.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | BOM (2006). ‘Climate Statistics for Australian Locations.’ (Bureau of Meteorology: Melbourne.) Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_075041.shtml [Verified 29 April 2008].

Boulton, R. L. , Cassey, P. , Schipper, C. , and Clarke, M. F. (2003). Nest site selection by yellow-faced Honeyeaters Lichenostomus chrysops. Journal of Avian Biology 34, 267–274.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Calder D. M. (1983). Mistletoes in focus: an introduction. In ‘The Biology of Mistletoes’. (Eds D. M. Calder and P. Bernhardt.) pp. 1–18. (Academic Press: Sydney.)

Chase, M. K. (2002). Nest site selection and nest success in a song sparrow population: the significance of spatial variation. Condor 104, 103–116.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cody M. L. (1985). An introduction to habitat selection in birds. In ‘Habitat Selection in Birds’. (Ed. M. L. Cody.) pp. 3–56. (Academic Press: New York.)

Cooney, S. J. N. , and Watson, D. M. (2005). Diamond Firetails (Stagonopleura guttata) preferentially nest in mistletoe. Emu 105, 317–322.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Crampton L. H. (2004). Ecological determinants of the distribution, abundance and breeding success of phainopeplas (Phainopepla nitens, Cl. Aves) at the northern edge of their range. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, NV.

Eddy, R. J. (1961). Twenty years of Painted Honeyeaters. Australian Bird Watcher 1, 122–128.
Garnet S. T., and Crowley G. M. (2000). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000.’ (Environment Australia: Canberra.)

Griffioen, P. A. , and Clarke, M. F. (2002). Large-scale bird-movement patterns evident in eastern Australian atlas data. Emu 102, 99–125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Higgins P. J., Peter J. M., and Steele W. K. (Eds) (2001). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Inouye, R. S. , Huntly, N. J. , and Inouye, D. W. (1981). Non-random orientation of Gila Woodpecker nest entrances in Saguaro Cacti. Condor 83, 88–89.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Martin T. E. (1992). Breeding productivity considerations: what are the appropriate habitat features for management? In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds’. (Eds J. M. Hagan and D. W. Johnston.) pp. 455–473. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)

Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. Bioscience 43, 523–532.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mueller-Dombois D., and Ellenberg H. (1974). ‘Aims and Methods in Vegetation Ecology.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York.)

Nelson, K. J. , and Martin, K. (1999). Thermal aspects of nest-site location for Vesper Sparrows and Horned Larks in British Columbia. Studies in Avian Biology 19, 137–143.
Reid N. (1986). Pollination and seed dispersal of mistletoes (Loranthaceae) by birds in southern Australia. In ‘The Dynamic Partnership: Birds and Plants in Southern Australia’. (Eds H. A. Ford and D. C. Paton.) pp. 64–84. (The Flora and Fauna of South Australia Handbooks Committee: Adelaide.)

Ricklefs, R. E. (1969). An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9, 1–48.
Walsberg G. E. (1985). Physiological consequences of microhabitat selection. In ‘Habitat Selection in Birds.’ (Ed. M. L. Cody.) pp. 389–413. (Academic Press: New York.)

Watson, D. M. (2001). Mistletoe—a keystone resource in forests and woodlands worldwide. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 219–249.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webb, D. R. (1987). Thermal tolerance of avian embryos. Condor 89, 874–898.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webb, D. R. , and King, J. R. (1983). An analysis of the heat budgets of the eggs and nest of the White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys in relation to parental attentiveness. Physiological Zoology 56, 493–505.


Weidinger, K. (2002). Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 424–437.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willson, M. F. , and Gende, S. M. (2000). Nesting success of forest birds in southeast Alaska and adjacent Canada. Condor 102, 314–324.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson, R. R. , and Cooper, R. J. (1998). Acadian flycatcher nest placement: does placement influence reproductive success? Condor 100, 673–679.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zerba, E. , and Morton, M. L. (1983). Dynamics of incubation in mountain White-crowned Sparrows. Condor 85, 1–11.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |