Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU06050
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 107(1)

Exploiting sensory ecology to reduce seabird by-catch

W. S. Norden A B and J. P. Pierre A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Marine Conservation Unit, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10-420, Wellington 6143, NZ.

B Present address: Audubon California, 376 Greenwood Beach Road, Tiburon, CA 94920, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: jpierre@doc.govt.nz

Emu 107(1) 38-43 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU06050
Submitted: 16 October 2006  Accepted: 1 February 2007   Published: 15 March 2007

Abstract

In a previous study, we reported that deploying small amounts of biogenic oil derived from the livers of school sharks (Galeorhinus galeus) was effective in reducing the numbers of seabirds attending fishing vessels and seabird diving activity in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. This seabird assemblage was numerically dominated by Flesh-footed Shearwaters (Puffinus carneipes) and the globally vulnerable Black Petrel (Procellaria parkinsoni). The results suggested that the oil deterrent operated via an olfactory or chemesthetic mechanism. Here we compare the deterrent effects of shark-liver oil with three other fish oils, in the Flesh-footed Shearwater–Black Petrel assemblage. We also report on trials assessing the deterrent efficacy of shark-liver oil and one other fish oil in an assemblage including four species of albatrosses (Diomedea spp., Thalasarcche spp.), Southern and Northern Giant-Petrels (Macronectes giganteus and M. halli), and Cape Petrels (Daption capense). Shark-liver oil was the most effective deterrent of the four fish oils tested in the Flesh-footed Shearwater–Black Petrel assemblage, but it did not deter albatrosses, giant-petrels or Cape Petrels from attending vessels. Thus, the deterrent was effective only on burrow-nesting seabird species. These results may provide further support for our speculation that the deterrent operates via an olfactory mechanism, while corroborating other work linking life-history characteristics of seabirds to their sensory ecology. We recommend research to investigate the mechanism and active ingredients by which shark-liver oil deters some species of seabirds. We also suggest testing fish oils on White-chinned (Procellaria aequinoctialis) and Grey (Procellaria cinerea) Petrels, and Sooty Shearwaters (Puffinus griseus), as well as in other areas occupied by Flesh-footed Shearwaters, to assess further potential for this natural oil or its ingredients to reduce by-catch of seabird species globally.


Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the International Association of Antarctic Tourist Operators, the SeaWorld and Busch Gardens Conservation Fund, and the New Zealand Department of Conservation through the Marine Conservation Unit and the Conservation Services Programme. We thank D. Kellian, G. Murman, N. Walker and the staff of Ocean Wings Kaikoura for essential field support, and D. Kellian, A. Oliveira, and S. Deans of SeaDragon for supplying fish oils. Dr L. S. Bull and S. J. Rowe, and two anonymous referees, provided helpful comments that improved the manuscript.


References

Baker, G. B. , and Wise, B. S. (2005). The impact of pelagic longline fishing on the flesh-footed shearwater Puffinus carneipes in eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 126, 306–316.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bull L. S. (2007). A review of methodologies aimed at mitigating incidental catch of protected seabirds. DOC Research, Development and Improvement Series #263. Department of Conservation, Wellington, NZ.

Clark L. (1997a). A review of the bird repellent effects of 117 Carbocyclic compounds. In ‘Repellents in Wildlife Management (August 8–10, 1995, Denver, CO)’. (Ed. J. R. Mason.) pp. 343–352. (USDA National Wildlife Research Center: Fort Collins, CO.)

Clark, L. (1997b). Physiological, ecological, and evolutionary bases for the avoidance of chemical irritants by birds. Current Ornithology 14, 1–37.
IUCN (2006). ‘2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Cambridge, UK.) Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/ [Accessed 30 August 2006].

Kajigaya, H. , and Oya, N. (1999). Physical effects of oil pollution in birds. Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology 31, 16–38.
Melvin E. F., Dietrich K. S., and Thomas T. (2004). ‘Pilot Tests of Techniques to Mitigate Seabird Interactions with Catcher Processor Vessels in the Bering Sea Pollock Trawl Fishery.’ (Washington SeaGrant Program, University of Washington: Seattle, WA.)

Nevitt, G. (1999). Olfactory foraging in Antarctic seabirds: a species-specific attraction to krill odors. Marine Ecology Progress Series 177, 235–241.
Robertson C. J. R., Bell E., and Scofield P. (2004). Autopsy report for seabirds killed and returned from New Zealand fisheries, 1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002. Department of Conservation Science Internal Series 155, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.

Roper, T. J. (1999). Olfaction in birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 28, 247–332.
SC-CAMLR (Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources) (1995). Report on the working group on fish stock assessment. In ‘Report of the Fourteenth Meeting of the Scientific Committee (SC-CAMLR-XIV)’. Annex 5. pp. 255–454. (Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources: Hobart.)

SC-CAMLR (Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources) (1998). Report on the working group on fish stock assessment. In ‘Report of the Seventeenth Meeting of the Scientific Committee (SC-CAMLR-XVII)’. Annex 5. pp. 301–495. (Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources: Hobart.)

Silverman, E. D. , Veit, R. R. , and Nevitt, G. A. (2004). Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277, 25–35.
SPSS Inc. (2003). ‘SPSS 12.0.1 for Windows.’ (SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL).

Tuck, G. N. , Polacheck, T. , Croxall, J. P. , and Weimerskirch, H. (2001). Modelling the impact of fishery by-catches on albatross populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 1182–1196.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | von Ende C. N. (1993). Repeated measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. In ‘Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments’. (Eds S. M. Scheiner, and J. Gurevitch.) pp. 113–137. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Wenzel, B. M. (1987). The terminal nerve (nervus terminalis). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 519, 137–149.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |