Does the integrity or structure of mallee habitat influence the degree of Fox predation on Malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata)?
David Priddel A C , Robert Wheeler A and Peter Copley BA Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia.
B Department for Environment and Heritage (SA), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: david.priddel@environment.nsw.gov.au
Emu 107(2) 100-107 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU06026
Submitted: 6 June 2006 Accepted: 3 May 2007 Published: 13 June 2007
Abstract
Malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata) are in decline across their range. Previous studies have found that the survival rate of young Malleefowl is low, the single greatest cause of mortality being predation by the introduced Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes). Many of these studies, particularly those in New South Wales (NSW), were conducted in habitats that were heavily modified by fire, exotic herbivores or plant harvesting. In this paper, we examine the survival of Malleefowl in relatively undisturbed mallee habitats within two conservation reserves in South Australia (SA). Both reserves were long unburnt and free of large exotic herbivores, but differed greatly in understorey structure. Fifteen young captive-reared Malleefowl were released into each reserve. In all, 70% of these individuals were dead within 40 days. Fox predation was the prime cause of mortality, accounting for at least 30%, and perhaps as much as 96%, of all deaths. The extent and causes of mortality were similar in the two reserves. The overall level of Malleefowl survival was (1) better than that recorded in more disturbed habitat in NSW in the absence of any Fox control, but (2) substantially less than that in NSW after widespread Fox control was implemented. This study indicates that Malleefowl in SA are subject to significant levels of Fox predation, even in relatively undisturbed habitats. Also, for the two mallee habitats examined, evidence suggests that understorey structure had no influence on the degree of predation. Available data indicate that during the past two decades Malleefowl populations in SA have declined at about the same rate as those in NSW. Current densities in SA are typically about one-quarter of what they were 15 years ago. We conclude that habitat integrity and structure have little effect on the interaction between Foxes and Malleefowl, and suggest that Malleefowl populations across Australia are threatened by Foxes, placing the species at substantial risk of extinction.
Acknowledgements
Staff from the SA National Parks and Wildlife Service collected the Malleefowl eggs. Dave Kennett and Neil Tuthill of the Monarto Zoological Park (formerly Monarto Fauna Complex) incubated the eggs, and raised the young before release. Russell Harlen and Paul O’Connor assisted with fieldwork during the initial period of radio-tracking. Peter Alexander, Peter Canty, Tony Flaherty, Peter Macrow, Lesley Muirhead, Lynn Pedler, Tony Robinson, Robin Storr, Peter Stroud and Stephanie Williams completed the radio-tracking component of the project. This research was conducted with Animal Ethics Approval No. 008 and under Scientific Investigation Licences No. A269 and C147 from the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; and with permission from the SA National Parks and Wildlife Service. We thank the two referees for their helpful comments on the paper.
Booth, D. T. (1987). Home range and hatching success of malleefowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae), in Murray mallee near Renmark, South Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 14, 95–104.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brickhill, J. (1985). An aerial survey of malleefowl nests at Round Hill Nature Reserve. Australian Wildlife Research 12, 257–261.
Frith, H. J. (1959). Breeding of the mallee-fowl, Leipoa ocellata Gould (Megapodiidae). CSIRO Wildlife Research 4, 31–60.
Harlen, R. , and Priddel, D. (1996). Potential food resources available to malleefowl Leipoa ocellata in marginal mallee lands during drought. Australian Journal of Ecology 21, 418–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morris, K. , Sims, C. , Himbeck, K. , Christensen, P. , Sercombe, N. , Ward, B. , and Noakes, N. (2004). Project Eden – fauna recovery on Peron Peninsula, Shark Bay: Western Shield review – February 2003. Conservation Science Western Australia 5, 202–234.
Priddel, D. , and Wheeler, R. (1990). Survival of Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata chicks in the absence of ground-dwelling predators. Emu 90, 81–87.
Priddel, D. , and Wheeler, R. (2003). Nesting activity and demography of an isolated population of malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata). Wildlife Research 30, 451–464.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Short, J. (1998). The extinction of rat-kangaroos (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) in New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 86, 365–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |