Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU06019
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 107(3)

The digital tendon locking mechanism of owls: variation in the structure and arrangement of the mechanism and functional implications

Luke Einoder A B and Alastair Richardson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 05, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

B Present address: School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: lukeeinoder@hotmail.com

Emu 107(3) 223-230 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU06019
Submitted: 11 May 2006  Accepted: 10 July 2007   Published: 7 September 2007

Abstract

This study provides evidence of morphological differences in support of the current phylogenetic division of the owls into two familes (Strigidae, Tytonidae), with respect to the digital tendon locking mechanism (TLM). This mechanism consists of modified surfaces on the flexor tendons in the digits, which, when engaged form a lock that holds the digits in a flexed position. Although species-specific differences in TLM structure were apparent, consistent inter-family differences occurred in the degree of expression of the TLM, its location within the digit, and in the structure and arrangement of the locking elements. Phylogenetic differences also occurred in the location of the associated digital ligaments. The TLM of the Strigidae was found to resemble that of the Falconiformes (Falconidae and Accipitridae). However, the Tytonidae possess a more distinctive pattern, characterised by a digit 1 TLM located at the opposite end of the digit and bearing reversed plicae. The biomechanics of the mechanism are considered, along with the functional implications of the varying structures in an attempt to understand the adaptiveness, or otherwise, of this-little known structure within an avian order.


Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Nick Mooney of the Department of Primary Industry Water and Environment (Tasmania) for suggesting this topic as an interesting area of research, and for providing an insight into the ecological significance of particular hindlimb structures. Also to Nick, thank you for comments on early drafts of this manuscript, and for providing many of the specimens used. Jason Wiersma provided much inspiration for the authors into the study of raptor ecology, for which this work owes a great deal. Thanks to Judy Rainbird of the Queen Victoria Museum, Tasmania, and Walter Boles of the Australian Museum, Sydney, who also kindly provided specimens. We would like to thank Ian Norman, of the Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria, for assistance with editing. Thanks also to the editors of Emu, whose comments and suggestions were greatly appreciated.


References

Baumel J. J. (Ed.) (1993). ‘Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium.’ 2nd edn. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club No. 23. (Nuttall Ornithological Club: Cambridge, MS.)

Benjamin, M. , and Evans, E. (1990). Fibrocartilage. Journal of Anatomy 171, 1–15.
| PubMed | Berger A. J. (1966). The musculature. In ‘Avian Myology’. (Eds J. C. George and A. J. Berger.) pp. 224–473. (Academic Press: London.)

Bock, W. J. , and Mornay, J. J. (1971). The preglassale of the Passer (Aves). American Zoologist 11, 105–115.
Brown L. (1976). ‘Eagles of the World.’ (Douglas, David and Charles Publishers: Vancouver, BC.)

Bruce M. D. (1999). Family Tytonidae (Barn-owls). In ‘Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 5: Barn-owls to Hummingbirds’. (Eds J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal.) pp. 34–75. (Lynx Edicions: Barcelona.)

Burton J. A., Rignall J., and Burton P. J. K. (1973). ‘Owls of the World: Their Evolution, Structure and Ecology.’ (Hodder and Soughton: London.)

Csermely, D. , and Gaibani, G. (1998). Is foot squeezing pressure by two raptor species sufficient to subdue their prey? Condor 100, 757–763.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Debus S. (1998). ‘The Birds of Prey of Australia.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Einoder, L. D. , and Richardson, A. (2006). An ecomorphological study of the raptorial digital tendon locking mechanism Ibis 148, 515–525.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gill F. B. (1995). ‘Ornithology’. 2nd edn. (W. H. Freeman and Co.: New York.)

Goslow, G. E. (1972). Adaptive mechanisms of the raptor pelvic limb. Auk 89, 47–64.
Hosking E., and Flegg J. (1982). ‘Eric Hosking’s Owls.’ (Mermaid Books: London.)

König C., Weick F., and Becking J. (1999). ‘Owls: A Guide to the Owls of the World.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.)

Niemi, G. (1985). Patterns of morphological evolution in bird genera of New World and Old World peatlands. Ecology 66, 1215–1228.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Norberg R. A. (2002). Independent evolution of outer ear asymmetry among five owl lineages; morphology, function and selection. In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Owls’. (Eds I. Newton, R. Kavanagh, J. Olsen and I. Taylor.) pp. 329–332. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Payne R. S. (1962). The acoustic location of prey by the Barn Owl (Tyto alba). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithica, New York.

Peters R. (1983). ‘The Ecological Implications of Body Size.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Peterson R. (1964). ‘The Birds.’ (Time-Life International: New York.)

Quinn, T. H. , and Baumel, J. J. (1990). The digital tendon locking mechanism of the avian foot. Zoomorphology 109, 281–293.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sibley C. G., and Ahlquist J. E. (1990). ‘Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study of Molecular Evolution.’ (Yale University Press: Newhaven, CT.)

Simmons, N. , and Quinn, T. (1994). Evolution of the digital tendon locking mechanism in bats and dermopterans: a phylogenetic perspective. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 2, 231–251.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sparks J., and Soper T. (1990). ‘Parrots: A Natural History.’ (Lothian: Melbourne.)

Steeger, C. , Esselink, H. , and Ydenberg, R. C. (1992). Comparative feeding ecology and reproductive performance of Ospreys in different habitats of south-eastern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70, 470–475.
Taylor I. (1994). ‘Barn Owls: Predator–Prey Relationships and Conservation.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Ward, A. B. , Weigl, P. D. , and Conroy, R. M. (2002). Functional morphology of raptor hindlimbs: implications for resource partitioning Auk 119, 1052–1063.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Yapp W. B. (1970). ‘The Life and Organisation of Birds: Contemporary Biology.’ (Edward Arnold: London.)