Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Population regulation in Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor): the role of intraspecific competition for nesting sites and food during breeding

Peter Dann A C and F. I. Norman B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Phillip Island Nature Park, PO Box 97, Cowes, Phillip Island, Vic. 3922, Australia.

B Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Natural Resources and Sustainability, PO Box 137, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: pdann@penguins.org.au

Emu 106(4) 289-296 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU06011
Submitted: 24 February 2006  Accepted: 13 September 2006   Published: 2 November 2006

Abstract

Although studies of seabirds have had a fundamental influence on development of theories of population regulation, the role and importance of potential factors regulating seabird populations remain unresolved. Food supply is commonly thought to be a significant limiting factor regulating seabird populations but difficulty in measuring availability of prey has meant that direct evidence is usually lacking. Here we examine the role that intraspecific competition for breeding sites and food during the breeding season plays in determining the size of populations of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) in south-eastern Australia. The relation between population sizes and available breeding area suggest that numbers of Little Penguins may be limited on smaller islands by area but clearly are not on larger islands. Little Penguins have very short foraging ranges and thus are likely to experience density-dependent food shortages when breeding. We found support for Ashmole’s ‘halo effect’ in that there was an inverse relationship between colony size and mean mass of chicks near fledging. However, more recent variations of this model (e.g. the ‘hungry horde’, or ‘hinterland’) do not explain the observed distribution and numbers of penguins breeding in Victoria. We conclude that both factors may be involved in the regulation of Little Penguin populations locally, and propose a model in which the area available for nesting is combined with intraspecific competition for food during breeding as co-determinants of population size.


Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the Penguin Study Group which provided part of the breeding data for Little Penguins at Phillip Island and assisted in surveys of numbers of Penguins at various colonies; to the late Mike Cullen and the St Kilda Penguin Group for details of breeding at St Kilda; and P. B. Du Guesclin (Department of Sustainability and Environment) for information for the Penguins at Port Campbell. Mike Cullen, David Ainley, John Arnould and two anonymous referees kindly commented on drafts of this paper, and Jon Fallaw provided assistance with the estimation of available breeding area on Phillip Island. We are grateful to them all.


References

Ainley, D. G. (1997). Factors regulating population size and colony formation of Adélie Penguins in the Ross Sea. Antarctic Journal 32, 107–108.
Ainley D. G., Leresche R. E., and Sladen W. J. L. (1983). ‘Breeding Biology of the Adelie Penguin.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)

Ainley, D. G. , Nur, N. , and Woehler, E. J. (1995). Factors affecting the distribution and size of pygoscelid penguin colonies in the Antarctic. Auk 112, 171–182.
Ashmole N. P. (1971). Seabird ecology and the marine environment. In ‘Avian Biology. Vol. 1’. (Eds D. S. Farner and J. R. King.) pp. 223–286. (Academic Press: New York.)

Barton, D. (1978). Breeding Fairy Penguins at Twofold Bay, NSW. Corella 2, 71–72.
Birkhead T. R., and Furness R. W. (1985). Regulation of seabird populations. In ‘Behavioural Ecology’. (Eds R. M. Sibley and R. H. Smith.) pp. 145–167. (Blackwell: Oxford, UK.)

Birt, V. L. , Birt, T. P. , Goulet, D. , Cairns, D. K. , and Montevecchi, W. A. (1987). Ashmole’s halo: direct evidence for prey depletion by a seabird. Marine Ecology Progress Series 40, 205–208.
Croxall J. P., and Rothery P. P.(1991). Population regulation of seabirds: implications of their demography for conservation. In ‘Bird Population Studies: Relevance to Conservation and Management’. (Eds C. M. Perrins, J.-D. LeBrereton and G. J. M. Hirons.) pp. 272–296. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Croxall J. P., Evans P. G. H., and Schreiber R. W. (Eds) (1984). ‘Status and Conservation of the World’s Seabirds.’ International Council for Bird Preservation Technical Publication No. 2 (ICPB: Cambridge, UK.)

Cullen, J. M. , Blake, N. , and Bickham, M. (1996). Urban penguins. Nature Australia 25, 22–28.
Dann P., and Cullen J. M. (1990). Survival, patterns of reproduction, and lifetime reproductive output in the Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) on Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia. In ‘Penguin Biology’. (Eds L. S. Davis and J. T. Darby.) pp. 63–84. (Academic Press: New York.)

Dann, P. , Cullen, J. M. , Thoday, R. , and Jessop, R. (1992). Movements and patterns of mortality at sea of Little Penguins Eudyptula minor from Phillip Island, Victoria. Emu 91, 278–286.
Fortescue M. E. (1995). Biology of the Little Penguin Eudyptula minor on Bowen Island and at other Australian colonies. In ‘The Penguins: Ecology and Management’. (Eds P. Dann, I. Norman and P. Reilly.) pp. 364–392. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Fortescue M. E. (1999). The marine and terrestrial ecology of a northern population of the Little Penguin, Eudyptula minor, from Bowen Island, Jervis Bay. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canberra.

Fullagar P. J., Heyligers P. C., Crowley M. A., and Klomp N. I. (1995). Gabo Island penguin survey November 1994. M. I. Partners Report No. 4, Moruya, NSW.

Furness, R. W. , and Barrett, R. T. (1985). The food requirements and ecological relationships of a seabird community in north Norway. Ornis Scandinavica 16, 305–313.
Gaston A. J., and Nettleship D. N. (1981). ‘The Thick-billed Murres of Prince Leopold Island.’ Canadian Wildlife Service Monograph Series No. 6. (Canadian Wildlife Service: Ottawa.)

Gaston, A. J. , Chapdelaine, G. , and Noble, D. G. (1983). The growth of Thick-billed Murre chicks at colonies in Hudson Strait: inter- and intra-colony variation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 2465–2475.
Lack D. (1954). ‘The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers.’ (Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.)

Lack D. (1966). ‘Population Studies of Birds.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Lane, S. G. (1979). Summary of the breeding seabirds on New South Wales coastal islands. Corella 3, 7–9.
Marchant S., and Higgins P. J. (Eds) (1990). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 1: Ratites to Ducks.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Menkhorst, P. W. , Kerry, K. R. , and Gaynor, G. F. (1988). Seabird Islands. No. 181. Mud Islands. Corella 12, 72–77.
Moors P. (Ed.) (1985). ‘Conservation of Island Birds. Case Studies for the Management of the Threatened Island Species.’ (International Council for the Bird Preservation: Cambridge, UK.)

Norman, F. I. (1992). Distribution and abundance of seabirds off Phillip Island and within Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, 1986–1988. Emu 91, 377–394.
Spencer R. D. (1982). The coast. In ‘Atlas of Victoria’. (Ed. J. S. Duncan.) pp. 136–142. (Victorian Government Printing Office: Melbourne.)

Statsoft (2006). ‘Statistica Version 7.1.’ (Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)

Storer, R. W. (1952). A comparison of variation, behaviour and evolution in the seabird genera Uria and Cepphus. University of California Publications in Zoology 52, 121–222.
Wienecke B. C., Wooller R. D., and Klomp N. I. (1995). The ecology and management of Little Penguins on Penguin Island, Western Australia. In ‘The Penguins: Ecology and Management’. (Eds P. Dann, I. Norman and P. Reilly.) pp. 440–447. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Wittenberger J. F., and Hunt G. L. (1985). The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. In ‘Avian Biology. Vol. 8’. (Eds D. S. Farner, J. R. King and K. C. Parkes.) pp. 1–78. (Academic Press: New York.)