Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Theft of bower decorations among male Satin Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): why are some decorations more popular than others?

Janine M. Wojcieszek A C , James A. Nicholls A D , N. Justin Marshall B and Anne W. Goldizen A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Vision, Touch and Hearing Research Centre, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.

C Present address: Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool, D. C. Perth, WA 6986, Australia.

D Present address: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom.

E Corresponding author. Email: a.goldizen@uq.edu.au

Emu 106(3) 175-180 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU05047
Submitted: 8 September 2005  Accepted: 17 May 2006   Published: 18 August 2006

Abstract

Male Satin Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) build stick structures known as bowers that serve as the focus for courtships and matings. Males decorate their bowers with numerous coloured decorations and are known to steal these decorations from one another. We investigated the stealing of bower decorations among males at the Bunya Mountains in Queensland, Australia. We aimed to (1) determine which classes of decorations were targets for theft in the studied population, and (2) examine whether the frequency at which individual decorations were stolen related to their intrinsic properties. To address our first aim, all decorations on the bowers of 21 adult males were labelled and their movements tracked throughout one mating season. To address our second aim, decorations stolen at least three times during the season were collected and their morphological and reflectance properties compared to those of decorations that were not stolen. In terms of the classes of decorations, tail feathers of Crimson Rosella (Platycercus elegans) were stolen more than any other class of decoration, but blue plastic bottletops were the most popular decorations relative to their availability on bowers. Frequently stolen individual decorations were similar to non-stolen items in their weights and surface areas, but were darker blue in colour than the decorations never stolen. Both bottletops and feathers reflected higher levels of ultraviolet (UV) light than did all other classes of bower decorations tested, thus suggesting that males may be using UV reflectance in sexual signalling. The darker blue, stolen decorations may increase contrast between the decoration collection and the platform, while the UV-reflecting subset of most frequently stolen decorations (bottletops and feathers) may increase contrast within the decoration collection. This in turn may increase the attractiveness of the display to females.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Stirling and Foxton families for allowing us to work on their properties, the Bjelke-Peterson family for allowing us to rent their property, and all of the field assistants for their time and assistance. Funding for this study was provided by the University of Queensland and the Australian Research Council.


References

Bennett, A. T. D. , and Cuthill, I. C. (1994). Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vision Research 34, 1471–1478.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Frith C. B., and Frith D. W. (2004). ‘The Bowerbirds – Ptilonorhynchidae.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK).

Goldsmith, T. H. (1994). Ultraviolet receptors and color vision: evolutionary implications and a dissonance of paradigms. Vision Research 34, 1479–1487.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Hart, N. S. (2001). The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 20, 675–703.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Hausmann, F. , Arnold, K. E. , Marshall, N. J. , and Owens, I. P. F. (2003). Ultraviolet signals in birds are special. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270, 61–67.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hunter, C. P. , and Dwyer, P. D. (1997). The value of objects to satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Emu 97, 200–206.


Johnstone, R. A. (1995). Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 70, 1–65.
PubMed |

Madden, J. R. (2002). Bower decorations attract females but provoke other male spotted bowerbirds: bower owners resolve this trade-off. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269, 1347–1351.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Madden, J. R. , and Tanner, K. (2003). Preferences for coloured bower decorations can be explained in a non-sexual context. Animal Behaviour 65, 1077–1083.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morrison-Scott, T. C. (1937). Experiments on colour-vision in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), with other observations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 107, 41–49.


Ödeen, A. , and Hastad, O. (2003). Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20, 855–861.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Rohwer, S. A. (1975). The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29, 593–610.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Uy, J. A. C. , and Endler, J. A. (2004). Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays. Behavioral Ecology 15, 1003–1010.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vellenga, R. (1970). Behaviour of the male satin bowerbird at the bower. Australian Bird Bander 8, 3–11.


Vorobyev, M. , and Osorio, D. (1998). Receptor noise as a determinant of colour threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 265, 351–358.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |