Parental care in Hooded Plovers (Thinornis rubricollis)
Michael A. Weston A B and Mark A. Elgar AA Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Current address: Birds Australia, 415 Riversdale Rd, Hawthorn East, Vic. 3123, Australia. Email: m.weston@birdsaustralia.com.au
Emu 105(4) 283-292 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU04004
Submitted: 24 January 2004 Accepted: 20 October 2005 Published: 21 December 2005
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of stage of the reproductive cycle, age of eggs and chicks, size of clutches and broods, habitat and prevailing temperature on patterns of parental care in Hooded Plovers. To control for the influence of disturbance on parental care, data that represented a relatively low level of disturbance were chosen for analysis. ‘Activity scans’ were made every 5 min and recorded the activity of every bird in view. Attendance during laying (30.3% and 43.4% of scans, n = 2 nests) was lower than when the clutch was completed (90.9 ± 8.3% of scans, n = 14 nests); during laying, temperatures of model eggs varied with air temperature (n = 7 nests). Attendance at nests was uniformly high (68.4–98.6% of daylight time, n = 14 nests) across the incubation period but the average attendance in each hour of the day was negatively correlated with air temperature (slope of linear regression –0.02, P = 0.014, n = 14 nests). Absences from the nest when the incubator left of its own accord (voluntary absences) were longest at air temperatures of 15–19°C (14.4 ± 28.9 min, n = 103 absences). Voluntary absences were most frequent at times of day when egg temperatures came close to, and were moving towards, egg temperatures recorded under uninterrupted incubation. As chicks grew they were brooded less (slope of linear regression –0.02, P = 0.009, n = 12 broods), and diurnal brooding was not recorded among chicks more than 10 days old. The average time devoted to brooding was negatively correlated with air temperature (slope of linear regression –0.04, P < 0.001, n = 12 broods). Adults attended broods more closely than clutches (means of 1.8 and 1.5 parents in view per scan respectively); adults used distraction displays only when defending broods (62.1%) and not when defending clutches (n = 409 investigator approaches). Adults maintained body mass when incubating (98.4 ± 5.5 g, n = 44), but body mass decreased when attending chicks (92.2 ± 5.3 g, n = 10). This may be explained by decreased foraging time when rearing broods (0.1 ± 0.1% of scans cf. 13.8 ± 0.1% when incubating). This study reveals a high level of attendance of Hooded Plovers at their nests and broods. Parental care differs substantially between stages of the reproductive cycle, with ambient temperature an important influence on attendance during incubation and brood-rearing. Parental care changed with age of the brood but not with age of the eggs. A number of factors (clutch- and brood-size, habitat) did not affect parental care.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted under Department of Sustainability and Environment (Vic.) permits (RP97208, RP96113 and RP95067), Parks Victoria permits (NP978/095, NP945/156 and NP67/011), Ethics Approval Permit (AEEC 6540720921120, Melbourne University Ethics Committee), and appropriate Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme (ABBBS) permits. Financial support was provided by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award, the Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund, the Australian Bird Environment Foundation, Barwon Heads Committee of Management, the M. A. Ingram Trust and the Stuart Leslie Bird Research Fund (Birds Australia). Drs M. A. Giese, D. P. Hart, W. Sutherland and J. Burger kindly commented on a Ph.D. Thesis chapter upon which this paper is based. C. Tzaros kindly assisted with submission. The final editorial stages of this paper were part of an Australian Government Natural Heritage Trust grant hosted by Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority. We thank two anonymous referees and Camilla Myers for their help.
Askenmo, C. (1977). Effects of addition and removal of nestlings on nestling weight, nestling survival, and female weight loss in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Pallas). Ornis Scandinavica 8, 1–8.
Dowling, B. , and Weston, M. A. (1999). Managing a breeding population of the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis in a high-use recreational environment. Bird Conservation International 9, 255–270.
Giese, M. (1996). Effects of human activity on Adelie Penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biological Conservation 75, 157–164.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maxson, S. J. , and Oring, L. W. (1980). Breeding season time and energy budgets of the polyandrous Spotted Sandpiper. Behaviour 74, 200–263.
Parr, R. (1980). Population study of Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria, using marked birds. Ornis Scandinavica 11, 179–189.
Staine, K. J. , and Burger, J. (1994). Nocturnal foraging behavior of breeding Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) in New Jersey. Auk 111, 579–587.
Visser, G. H. , and Ricklefs, R. E. (1993a). Temperature regulation in neonates of shorebirds. Auk 110, 445–447.
Weston, M. A. , and Elgar, M. A. (2005). Disturbance to brood-rearing Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis: responses and consequences. Bird Conservation International 15, 193–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |