Structural complexity and turbidity do not interact to influence predation rate and prey selectivity by a small visually feeding fish
Bruno R. S. Figueiredo A C , Roger P. Mormul A B and Evanilde Benedito A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura (Nupélia), Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Bloco H-90, Maringá, PR, CEP 87020-900, Brazil.
B Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Comparada, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Bloco G-80, Maringá, PR, CEP 87020-900, Brazil.
C Corresponding author. Email: figueiredo.biologo@gmail.com
Marine and Freshwater Research 66(2) 170-176 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14030
Submitted: 1 October 2013 Accepted: 3 June 2014 Published: 14 October 2014
Abstract
Structural complexity and turbidity decrease predation by respectively providing a physical and visual refuge for prey. It is still unclear how the covariance between these variables could drive predation and prey selectivity. We experimentally simulated scenarios that are temporally observed in floodplain rivers. In the experiments, we crossed different prey types, structural complexity and turbidity. We hypothesised that the negative relationship between structural complexity and predation would become stronger with a linear increase in the turbidity level and that an increase in structural complexity and in turbidity would change prey selectivity from a selective to a random pattern. Our results showed that the effects of structural complexity and turbidity on predation may not covary; a linear increase in turbidity did not significantly change the patterns of predation or prey selectivity. In contrast, structural complexity significantly reduced prey consumption according to prey size. We argue that areas with low macrophyte cover may provide an efficient refuge for smaller prey, whereas an efficient refuge for larger prey can be attained only in areas with high macrophyte cover. In highly complex habitats, specificity in prey consumption is precluded because both prey species can hide amid the interstices of the macrophytes, leading to random prey selectivity.
Additional keywords: environmental shifts, invertivorous, predator–prey interaction, submerged macrophytes, visual predation.
References
Agostinho, A. A., Thomaz, S. M., Gomes, L. C., and Baltar, S. L. S. M. A. (2007). Influence of the macrophytes Eichhornia azurea on fish assemblage of the upper Paraná River floodplain (Brazil). Aquatic Ecology 41, 611–619.| Influence of the macrophytes Eichhornia azurea on fish assemblage of the upper Paraná River floodplain (Brazil).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1eqsrfI&md5=1d0889c9ad36556b01484fa0988182a3CAS |
Aksnes, D. L., and Utne, A. C. W. (1997). A revised model of visual range in fish. Sarsia 82, 137–147.
Allen-Ankins, S., Stoffels, R. J., Pridmore, P. A., and Vogel, M. T. (2012). The effects of turbidity, prey density and environmental complexity on the feeding of juvenile Murray cod Maccullochella peelii. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 195–206.
| The effects of turbidity, prey density and environmental complexity on the feeding of juvenile Murray cod Maccullochella peelii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC387itlKnsw%3D%3D&md5=a60bce6bfc86b3c88a59ca55a37a5bddCAS | 22220898PubMed |
Banks, P. B., Norrdahl, K., and Korpimäki, E. (2000). Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 267, 1621–1625.
| Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhvFOmsA%3D%3D&md5=11ad4f07d15ff134508c5168f3541ae1CAS |
Brönmark, C., and Hansson, L. A. (2012). ‘Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems.’ (University Press: New York.)
Carter, M. W., Shoup, D. E., Dettmers, J. M., and Wahl, D. H. (2010). Effects of turbidity and cover on prey selectivity of adult smallmouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139, 353–361.
| Effects of turbidity and cover on prey selectivity of adult smallmouth bass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Casatti, L., Mendes, H. F., and Ferreira, K. M. (2003). Aquatic macrophytes as feeding site for small fishes in the Rosana Reservoir, Paranapanema River, southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63, 213–222.
| Aquatic macrophytes as feeding site for small fishes in the Rosana Reservoir, Paranapanema River, southeastern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svkvV2qtQ%3D%3D&md5=bc8eb286fde0c22dd70f6983534903cbCAS |
Confer, J. L., Howick, G. L., Corzette, M. H., Kramer, S. L., Fitzgibbon, S., and Landesberg, R. (1978). Visual predation by planktivores. Oikos 31, 27–37.
| Visual predation by planktivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cripa, V. E. L., Hahn, N. S., and Fugi, R. (2009). Food resource used by small-sized fish in macrophyte patches in ponds of the upper Paraná River. Acta Scientiarum, Biological Sciences 31, 119–125.
De Robertis, A., Ryer, C. H., Veloza, A., and Brodeur, R. D. (2003). Differential effects of turbidity on prey consumption of piscivorous and planktivorous fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60, 1517–1526.
| Differential effects of turbidity on prey consumption of piscivorous and planktivorous fish.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Diehl, S. (1988). Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos 53, 207–214.
| Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dörner, H., and Wagner, A. (2003). Size dependent predator–prey relationships between perch and their fish prey. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1021–1032.
| Size dependent predator–prey relationships between perch and their fish prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., and Chilko, D. (2004). ‘Statistics for Research.’ (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA.)
Engström-Öst, J., Lehtiniemi, M., Jónasdóttir, S. H., and Viitasalo, M. (2005). Growth of pike larvae (Esox lucius) under different conditions of food quality and salinity. Ecology Freshwater Fish 14, 385–393.
| Growth of pike larvae (Esox lucius) under different conditions of food quality and salinity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Figueiredo, B. R. S., Mormul, R. P., and Benedito, E. (2013). Non-additive effects of macrophyte cover and turbidity on predator–prey interactions involving an invertivorous fish and different prey types. Hydrobiologia 716, 21–28.
| Non-additive effects of macrophyte cover and turbidity on predator–prey interactions involving an invertivorous fish and different prey types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlWqsLjL&md5=e8ceeaf67234ee19c2595ae98eae3991CAS |
Gardner, M. B. (1981). Effects of turbidity on feeding rates and selectivity of bluegills. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110, 446–450.
| Effects of turbidity on feeding rates and selectivity of bluegills.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gradall, K. S., and Swenson, W. A. (1982). Responses of brook trout and creek chubs to turbidity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111, 392–395.
| Responses of brook trout and creek chubs to turbidity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gray, S. M., Sabbah, S., and Hawryshyn, C. W. (2011). Experimentally increased turbidity causes behavioural shifts in Lake Malawi cichlids. Ecology Freshwater Fish 20, 529–536.
| Experimentally increased turbidity causes behavioural shifts in Lake Malawi cichlids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory, R. S., and Levings, C. D. (1996). The effects of turbidity and vegetation on the risk of juvenile salmonids, Oncorhynchus spp., to predation by adult cutthroat trout O. clarki. Environmental Biology of Fishes 47, 279–288.
| The effects of turbidity and vegetation on the risk of juvenile salmonids, Oncorhynchus spp., to predation by adult cutthroat trout O. clarki.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grenouillet, G., and Pont, D. (2001). Juvenile fishes in macrophyte beds: influence of food resources, habitat structure and body size. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 939–959.
| Juvenile fishes in macrophyte beds: influence of food resources, habitat structure and body size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffiths, D. (1980). Foraging costs and relative prey size. American Naturalist 116, 743–752.
| Foraging costs and relative prey size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heck, K. L., Jr, and Crowder, L. V. (1991). Habitat structure and predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In ‘Habitat Complexity: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space’. (Eds S. S. Bell, E. D. McCoy and H. R. Mushinsky.) pp. 281–289. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)
Helenius, L. K., Borg, J. P. G., Nurminen, L., Leskinen, E., and Lehtonen, H. (2013). The effects of turbidity on prey consumption and selection of zooplanktivorous Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Aquatic Ecology 47, 349–356.
| The effects of turbidity on prey consumption and selection of zooplanktivorous Gasterosteus aculeatus L.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higuti, J., Velho, L. F. M., Lansac-Tôha, F. A., and Martens, K. (2007). Pleuston communities are buffered from regional flood pulses: the example of ostracods in the Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Freshwater Biology 52, 1930–1943.
| Pleuston communities are buffered from regional flood pulses: the example of ostracods in the Paraná River floodplain, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ivlev, V. S. (1961). ‘Experimental Ecology of Feeding Fishes.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.)
Jacobsen, L., Berg, S., and Jepsen, N. (2004). Does roach behavior differ between shallow lakes of different environmental state? Journal of Fish Biology 65, 135–147.
| Does roach behavior differ between shallow lakes of different environmental state?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johansson, F. (1993). Effects of prey type, prey density and predator presence on behaviour and predation risk in a larval damselfly. Oikos 68, 481–489.
| Effects of prey type, prey density and predator presence on behaviour and predation risk in a larval damselfly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jönsson, M., Hylander, S., Ranåker, L., Nilsson, P. A., and Brönmark, C. (2011). Foraging success of juvenile pike Esox lucius depends on visual conditions and prey pigmentation. Journal of Fish Biology 79, 290–297.
| Foraging success of juvenile pike Esox lucius depends on visual conditions and prey pigmentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21722125PubMed |
Krebs, C. J. (1989). ‘Ecological Methodology.’ (Harper Collins Publishers: New York.)
Lehtiniemi, M., Engström-Öst, J., and Viitasalo, M. (2005). Turbidity decreases anti-predator behaviour in pike larvae, Esox lucius. Environmental Biology of Fishes 73, 1–8.
| Turbidity decreases anti-predator behaviour in pike larvae, Esox lucius.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loverde-Oliveira, S. M., Huszar, V. L. M., Mazzeo, N., and Scheffer, M. (2009). Hydrology-driven regime shifts in a shallow tropical lake. Ecosystems 12, 807–819.
| Hydrology-driven regime shifts in a shallow tropical lake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Luiz, E. A., Agostinho, A. A., Gomes, L. C., and Hahn, N. S. (1998). Ecologia trófica de peixes em dois riachos da bacia do rio Paraná. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 58, 273–285.
MacArthur, R. H., and Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist 100, 603–609.
| On optimal use of a patchy environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Malabarba, L. R. (1998). Monophyly of the Cheirodontinae, characters and major clades (Ostariophysi: Characidae). In ‘Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes’. (Eds L. R. Malabarba, R. E. Reis, R. P. Vari, Z. M. S. Lucena and C. A. S. Lucena.) pp. 193–233. (EDIPUCRS: Porto Alegre, Brazil.)
Matthews, W. J. (1998). ‘Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York.)
Miranda, L. E. (2011). Depth as an organizer of fish assemblages in floodplain lakes. Aquatic Sciences 73, 211–221.
| Depth as an organizer of fish assemblages in floodplain lakes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXltVyjt7g%3D&md5=1b0997679eb37e5e84313e4d116580ccCAS |
Mormul, R. P., Vieira, L. A., Júnior, S. P., Monkolski, A., and dos Santos, A. M. (2006). Sucessão de invertebrados durante o processo de decomposição de duas plantas aquáticas (Eichhornia azurea e Polygonum ferrugineum). Acta Scientiarum, Biological Sciences 28, 109–115.
Mormul, R. P., Thomaz, S. M., Agostinho, A. A., Bonecker, C. C., and Mazzeo, N. (2012). Migratory benthic fishes may induce regime shifts in a tropical floodplain pond. Freshwater Biology 57, 1592–1602.
| Migratory benthic fishes may induce regime shifts in a tropical floodplain pond.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oliveira, E. F., Goulart, E., Breda, L., Minte-Vera, C. V., Paiva, L. R. S., and Vismara, M. R. (2010). Ecomorphological patterns of the fish assemblage in a tropical floodplain: effects of trophic, spatial and phylogenetic structures. Neotropical Ichthyology 8, 569–586.
Padial, A. A., and Thomaz, S. M. (2008). Prediction of the light attenuation coefφιcient through the Secchi disk depth: empirical modeling in two large Neotropical ecosystems. Limnology 9, 143–151.
| Prediction of the light attenuation coefφιcient through the Secchi disk depth: empirical modeling in two large Neotropical ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Padial, A. A., Thomaz, S. M., and Agostinho, A. A. (2009). Effects of structural heterogeneity provided by the floating macrophyte Eichhornia azurea on the predation efficiency and habitat use of the small Neotropical fish Moenkhausia sanctafilomena. Hydrobiologia 624, 161–170.
| Effects of structural heterogeneity provided by the floating macrophyte Eichhornia azurea on the predation efficiency and habitat use of the small Neotropical fish Moenkhausia sanctafilomena.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pedro, P., and Ramos, J. A. (2009). Diet and prey selection of shorebirds on salt pans in the Mondego estuary, western Portugal. Ardeola 56, 1–11.
Pelicice, F. M., and Agostinho, A. A. (2006). Feeding ecology of fishes associated with Egeria spp. patches in a tropical reservoir, Brazil. Ecology Freshwater Fish 15, 10–19.
| Feeding ecology of fishes associated with Egeria spp. patches in a tropical reservoir, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Persson, L. (1993). Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68, 12–22.
| Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Persson, L., and Eklöv, P. (1995). Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology 76, 70–81.
| Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Piana, P. A., Gomes, L. C., and Cortez, E. M. (2006). Factors influencing Serrapinnus notomelas (Characiformes, Characidae) populations in upper Paraná river floodplain lagoons. Neotropical Ichthyology 4, 81–86.
| Factors influencing Serrapinnus notomelas (Characiformes, Characidae) populations in upper Paraná river floodplain lagoons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priyadarshana, T., Asaeda, T., and Manatunge, J. (2001). Foraging behaviour of planktivorous fish in artificial vegetation: the effects on swimming and feeding. Hydrobiologia 442, 231–239.
| Foraging behaviour of planktivorous fish in artificial vegetation: the effects on swimming and feeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Quinn, G. P., and Keough, M. J. (2002). ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Ranåker, L., Jönsson, M., Nilsson, P. A., and Brönmark, C. (2012). Effects of brown and turbid water on piscivore–prey fish interactions along a visibility gradient. Freshwater Biology 57, 1761–1768.
| Effects of brown and turbid water on piscivore–prey fish interactions along a visibility gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rocha, R. R. A., Thomaz, S. M., Carvalho, P., and Gomes, L. C. (2009). Modeling chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen concentration in tropical floodplain lakes (Paraná River, Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Biology 69, 491–500.
| Modeling chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen concentration in tropical floodplain lakes (Paraná River, Brazil).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnhtFCktw%3D%3D&md5=44497e0f68624595a440859910146706CAS |
Savino, J., and Stein, R. A. (1982). Predator–prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submerged vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111, 255–266.
| Predator–prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submerged vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scheinin, M., Scyphers, S. B., Kauppi, L., Heck, K. L., and Mattila, J. (2012). The relationship between vegetation density and its protective value depends on the densities and traits of prey and predators. Oikos 121, 1093–1102.
| The relationship between vegetation density and its protective value depends on the densities and traits of prey and predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shoup, D. E., and Wahl, D. H. (2009). The effect of turbidity on prey selection by piscivorous largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138, 1018–1027.
| The effect of turbidity on prey selection by piscivorous largemouth bass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Skov, C., Berg, S., Jacobsen, L., and Jepsen, N. (2002). Habitat use and foraging success of 0+ pike (Esox lucius L.) in experimental ponds related to prey fish, water transparency and light intensity. Ecology Freshwater Fish 11, 65–73.
| Habitat use and foraging success of 0+ pike (Esox lucius L.) in experimental ponds related to prey fish, water transparency and light intensity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Snickars, M., Sandtröm, A., and Mattila, J. (2004). Antipredator behaviour of 0+ year Perca fluviatilis: effect of vegetation density and turbidity. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 1604–1613.
| Antipredator behaviour of 0+ year Perca fluviatilis: effect of vegetation density and turbidity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sousa, W. T. Z., Thomaz, S. M., and Murphy, K. J. (2010). Response of native Egeria najas Planch. and invasive Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle to altered hydroecological regime in a subtropical river. Aquatic Botany 92, 40–48.
| Response of native Egeria najas Planch. and invasive Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle to altered hydroecological regime in a subtropical river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stansfield, J. H., Perrow, M. R., Tench, L. D., Jowitt, A. J. D., and Taylor, A. A. L. (1997). Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure. Hydrobiologia 342/343, 229–240.
| Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Statsoft Inc. (2005). STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System) Version 7.1 for Windows: Statistics. (STATSOFT Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)
Stuart-Smith, R. D., Stuart-Smith, J. F., White, R. W. G., and Barmuta, L. A. (2007). The effects of turbidity and complex habitats on the feeding of a galaxiid fish are clear and simple. Marine and Freshwater Research 58, 429–435.
| The effects of turbidity and complex habitats on the feeding of a galaxiid fish are clear and simple.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sweka, J. A., and Hartman, K. J. (2001). Effects of turbidity on prey consumption and growth in brook trout and implications for bioenergetics modeling. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 386–393.
| Effects of turbidity on prey consumption and growth in brook trout and implications for bioenergetics modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomaz, S. M., Dibble, E. D., Evangelista, L. R., Higuti, J., and Bini, L. M. (2008). Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshwater Biology 53, 358–367.
Turesson, H., and Brönmark, C. (2007). Predator–prey encounter rate in freshwater piscivores: effects of prey density and water transparency. Oecologia 153, 281–290.
| Predator–prey encounter rate in freshwater piscivores: effects of prey density and water transparency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17453254PubMed |
Utne-Palm, A. C. (1999). The effect of prey mobility, prey contrast, turbidity and spectral composition on the reaction distance of Gobiusculus flavescens to its planktonic prey. Journal of Fish Biology 54, 1244–1258.
| The effect of prey mobility, prey contrast, turbidity and spectral composition on the reaction distance of Gobiusculus flavescens to its planktonic prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Utne-Palm, A. C. (2002). Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: physical and behavioural aspects. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 35, 111–128.
| Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: physical and behavioural aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webster, M. M., Atton, N., Ward, A. J. W., and Hart, P. J. B. (2007). Turbidity and foraging rate in threespine sticklebacks: the importance of visual and chemical prey cues. Behaviour 144, 1347–1360.
| Turbidity and foraging rate in threespine sticklebacks: the importance of visual and chemical prey cues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weibel, D., and Peter, A. (2013). Effectiveness of different types of block ramps for fish upstream movement. Aquatic Sciences 75, 251–260.
| Effectiveness of different types of block ramps for fish upstream movement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zar, J. H. (2010). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Pearson Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.)
