Integrating aquatic science and policy for improved water management in Australia
Moya Tomlinson A and Richard Davis BA Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
B National Water Commission, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: moyatomlins@gmail.com
Marine and Freshwater Research 61(7) 808-813 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09224
Submitted: 7 September 2009 Accepted: 11 February 2010 Published: 23 July 2010
Abstract
Worldwide, science–policy integration across jurisdictional boundaries is emerging as a major challenge to sustainable water management. The Australian national water reforms require statutory provision for environmental outcomes in water plans, informed by the best available science. Assessments of progress towards this goal of scientifically rigorous environmental water provision indicate that, despite a multiplicity of effort in aquatic research and management, the pace of reform has been too slow for adequate protection of aquatic ecosystems. Although there are significant knowledge gaps, these are not the only obstacles to effective application of aquatic science in water plans. Progress on environmental water reform can be enhanced by recognising the cultural differences between science and policy, and by integrating communication and policy development activities from the outset of every applied science research program. Cross-jurisdictional progress in sustainable water management requires a comprehensive water research and policy development strategy using a toolbox of techniques to harness the considerable expertise and knowledge of aquatic scientists, policy makers and water planners in an integrated program to deliver the aquatic science applications called for by the national water reforms.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr James Horne, Ms Kerry Olsson and Mr Ken Matthews for helpful discussions. We are grateful to the Guest Editor and two anonymous referees whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009). A historical perspective on science and its “others”. Isis 100, 359–368.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen, P. (1990). The turbulent boundary between water science and water management. Freshwater Biology 24, 201–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen, P. W. , Norris, R. H. , Resh, V. H. , Reynoldson, T. B. , and Rosenberg, D. M. , et al. (1999). Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology. Freshwater Biology 42, 131–142.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbons, P. , Zammit, C. , Youngentob, K. , Possingham, H. P. , and Lindenmayer, D. B. , et al. (2009). Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management. Ecological Management & Restoration 9, 182–186.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kroon, F. J. , Robinson, C. J. , and Dale, A. P. (2009). Integrating knowledge to inform water quality planning in the Tully-Murray basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 1183–1188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Poff, N. L. , Richter, B. D. , Arthington, A. A. , Bunn, S. E. , and Naiman, R. J. , et al. (2010). The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55, 147–170.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |