Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of survival and detection probabilities for multiple tagged salmon stocks with nested migration routes, using a large-scale telemetry array

Michael C. Melnychuk
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Zoology and Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. Email: mikem@zoology.ubc.ca

Marine and Freshwater Research 60(12) 1231-1243 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08361
Submitted: 24 December 2008  Accepted: 30 March 2009   Published: 17 December 2009

Abstract

Mark–recapture models for estimating survival and detection probabilities of tagged animals that migrate past successive receiver stations can incorporate multiple, linked stocks to improve detection probability estimates. When multiple release groups are analysed in a common framework, detection information can be shared to compensate for small sample sizes and provide generality beyond single-stock approaches. Methods for structuring complex detection history data and applying standard mark–recapture models are presented, allowing for information sharing among multiple stocks under nested migration route structures, where some portions of routes are shared with other stocks and other portions are unique. Possible biases from split-route migration patterns within a release group are described, along with a simple method of correcting these biases using stock-specific parameters that incorporate movement probabilities. Environmental covariates can be paired with stock-specific run timing data to model stock-specific detection probabilities that change seasonally. Finally, a method for assessing the redundancy of receivers on a multiple-receiver detection line is described, based on considerations of receiver line geometry. Examples are drawn from detection data of juvenile salmon on the Pacific Ocean Shelf Tracking Project (POST) array, but the methods presented here are transferable to other systems.

Additional keywords: capture–recapture, CJS, detection efficiency, fish mortality, Program MARK.


Acknowledgements

I thank Steve Lindley, Steve Martell, Carl Walters, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. I thank Carl Schwarz and Simon Bonner for helpful discussions about these CJS modifications, particularly for the encouragement to pursue the odd/even knockout assessment. I thank POST members John Payne, Aswea Porter, and David Welch for their comments on an earlier version and Erin Rechisky for discussions on these topics. I thank Jeff Laake for comments on the example R code used in the Accessory publication on the web. The author was supported by a Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


References

Arnason, A. N. (1973). The estimation of population size, migration rates, and survival in a stratified population. Researches on Population Ecology 15, 1–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Burnham K. P., and Anderson D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York, NY.)

Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R., White G. C., Brownie C., and Pollock K. H. (1987). ‘Design and Analysis Methods for Fish Survival Experiments Based on Release-Recapture.’ (American Fisheries Society Monograph 5: Bethesda, MD.)

Collis, K. , Roby, D. D. , Craig, D. P. , Ryan, B. A. , and Ledgerwood, R. D. (2001). Colonial waterbird predation on juvenile salmonids tagged with passive integrated transponders in the Columbia river estuary: Vulnerability of different salmonid species, stocks, and rearing types. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130, 385–396.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Groot C., and Cooke K. (1987) Are the migrations of juvenile and adult Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in near-shore waters related? In ‘Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) Population Biology and Future Management’. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 96. (Eds H. D. Smith, L. Margolis and C. C. Wood.) pp. 53–60. (Department of Fisheries and Oceans: Ottawa.)

Hartt A. C., and Dell M. B. (1986). Early oceanic migrations and growth of juvenile Pacific salmon and steelhead trout. International North Pacific Fisheries Commission Bulletin No. 46. Vancouver, Canada.

Healey M. C. (1980). The ecology of juvenile salmon in Georgia Strait, British Columbia. In ‘Salmonid Ecosystems of the North Pacific’. (Eds W. J. McNeil and D. C. Himsworth.) pp. 203–230. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR.)

Hedger, R. D. , Martin, F. , Dodson, J. J. , Hatin, D. , and Caron, F. , et al. (2008). The optimized interpolation of fish positions and speeds in an array of fixed acoustic receivers. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1248–1259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Laake J., and Rexstad E. (2009). RMark – an alternative approach to building linear models in MARK (Appendix C). In ‘Program MARK: A Gentle Introduction’. 7th edn. (Eds E. Cooch and G. White.) pp. C1–C109. Version 1.8.8. Available at www.phidot.org/software/mark/rmark/ [accessed 27 March 2009].

Lebreton, J. D. , Burnham, K. P. , Clobert, J. , and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62, 67–118.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pearcy W. G. (1992). ‘Ocean Ecology of North Pacific Salmonids.’ (Washington Sea Grant Program: Seattle, WA.)

Pledger, S. , Pollock, K. H. , and Norris, J. L. (2003). Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack–Jolly–Seber model. Biometrics 59, 786–794.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Skalski J. R. (2006). Evaluation and recommendations on alternative hydroacoustic array deployments for the mouth of the Columbia River to provide estimates of salmonid smolt survival and movements. The design and analysis of salmonid tagging studies in the Columbia Basin No. 20, U. Washington, Seattle. Report No. DOE/BP-00025091-1.

Skalski, J. R. , Lady, J. , Townsend, R. , Giorgi, A. E. , and Stevenson, J. R. , et al. (2001). Estimating in-river survival of migrating salmonid smolts using radiotelemetry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 1987–1997.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Voegeli F. A., and Pincock D. G. (1996). Overview of underwater acoustics as it applies to telemetry. In ‘Underwater Biotelemetry: Proceedings of the First Conference and Workshop on Fish Telemetry in Europe’. (Eds E. Baras and J. C. Phillipart.) pp. 23–40. (University of Liège: Liège, Belgium.)

Welch, D. W. , Boehlert, G. W. , and Ward, B. R. (2003). POST – the Pacific Ocean salmon tracking project. Oceanologica Acta 25, 243–253.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | White G. C., Burnham K. P. (1999). Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Suppl.), 120–139. Version5.1. Available at www.phidot.org/software/mark/ [accessed 27 March 2009].

Zabel, R. W. , and Achord, S. (2004). Relating size of juveniles to survival within and among populations of chinook salmon. Ecology 85, 795–806.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |