Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF05227
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(1)

Hard prey specialists or opportunistic generalists? An examination of the diet of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus

A. B. Collins A B C D , M. R. Heupel B , R. E. Hueter B and P. J. Motta A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of South Florida, Department of Biology, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA.

B Center for Shark Research, Mote Marine Laboratory, 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway, Sarasota, Florida 34236, USA.

C Current address: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 100 8th Avenue SE, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: angela.collins@myFWC.com

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(1) 135-144 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05227
Submitted: 22 November 2005  Accepted: 27 July 2006   Published: 30 January 2007

Abstract

Atlantic cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) are benthic, suction feeders whose foraging activities have been implicated in severe damage to commercial shellfish industries. With jaws highly modified for durophagy, it has been assumed that R. bonasus are crushing specialists that feed primarily upon hard molluscan prey. Stomach contents from R. bonasus caught within Florida’s Charlotte Harbor estuary between July 2003 and July 2004 were analysed using the index of relative importance (IRI) to determine most important prey types. Prey items were identified from 38 families and fell into nine distinctive groups. The three most dominant prey groups were crustaceans (%IRI = 55.31), polychaetes (%IRI = 25.20) and bivalves (%IRI = 12.58). Shoalmates had more similar diets than non-shoalmates, suggesting group feeding. Most small or softer-bodied prey consumed were relatively intact, indicating lack of prey processing and capture through suction feeding. All larger, harder-bodied prey showed evidence of crushing (fractured and broken shells). Although R. bonasus has been characterised as a hard prey specialist, these results suggest it may behave as an opportunistic generalist, modifying feeding behaviour to consume readily available prey.

Additional keywords: benthic feeding, durophagy, feeding ecology, Myliobatiformes, stingray.


Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the Mote Scientific Foundation, the University of South Florida, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, PADI Foundation, PADI Project Aware and NOAA/NMFS through the National Shark Research Consortium. Thanks to Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute’s Fisheries-Independent Monitoring Program, especially Gregg Poulakis, Phil Stevens, and the Charlotte Harbor field laboratory staff for collecting samples, and to Bob McMichael, Tim MacDonald and Chuck Idelberger for allowing A. B. Collins to review historical sampling data. Thanks to Jay Leverone, Anamari Jayo Boyes and Debi Ingrao for their assistance in identification of benthic organisms; to Colin Simpfendorfer, Susan Bell and Beau Yeiser for their help and guidance; and to Tony Tucker, Jack Morris, Adam Summers, Jim Gelsleichter, John Tyminski, Julie Neer and numerous student interns for their assistance throughout the duration of this project. A. B. Collins was the recipient of the Mote Marine Laboratory and University of South Florida Graduate Fellowship in Elasmobranch Biology during the course of this work. All research was conducted under the guidelines of the University of South Florida’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC certification No. 2331).


References

Bigelow H. B., and Schroeder W. C. (1953). ‘Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Part Two: Sawfishes, Guitarfishes, Skates, Rays and Chimaeroids.’ (Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Yale University: New Haven, CT.)

Blaylock, R. A. (1989). A massive school of cownose rays, Rhinoptera bonasus (Rhinopteridae), in lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Copeia 3, 744–748.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Blaylock R. A. (1992). Distribution, abundance and behavior of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus (Mitchill 1815), in lower Chesapeake Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA.

Blaylock, R. A. (1993). Distribution and abundance of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 16, 255–263.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Culter J. K. (1986). Manual for identification of marine invertebrates: A guide to some common macroinvertebrates of the Big Bend region, Tampa Bay, Florida. (United States Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH.)

Donaldson J. (1985). A small scale benthic study of the Myaka River estuary. B.Sc. Thesis. New College of the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Estevez E. D. (1981). ‘Charlotte Harbor Estuarine Ecosystem Complex: A Summary of Scientific Information.’ Mote Marine Laboratory Review Series 3. (Mote Marine Laboratory: Sarasota, FL.)

Estevez E. D. (1986). ‘Infaunal Macroinvertebrates of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System and Surrounding Inshore Waters, Florida.’ Water Resources Investigations Report No. 85-4260. (United States Geological Survey: Tallahassee, FL.)

Gray, A. E. , Mulligan, T. J. , and Hannah, R. W. (1997). Food habits, occurrence and population structure of the bat ray, Myliobatis californica, in Humboldt Bay, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49, 227–238.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Krebs C. J. (1999). ‘Ecological Methodology.’ 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley: Menlo Park, CA.)

Kyne, P. M. , and Bennett, M. B. (2002). Diet of the eastern shovelnose ray, Aptychotrema rostrata (Shaw & Nodder, 1974), from Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 53, 679–686.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Merriner J. V., and Smith J. W. (1979). ‘A Report to the Oyster Industry of Virginia on the Biology and Management of the Cownose Ray (Rhinoptera bonasus, Mitchill) in Lower Chesapeake Bay.’ Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering 216. (Virginia Institute of Marine Science: Gloucester Point, VA.)

Morisita, M. (1959). Measuring of interspecific assosciation and similarity between communities. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University. Series E (Biology) 3, 65–80.
Pitcher T. J., and Parrish J. K. (1993). Functions of shoaling behavior in teleosts. In ‘Behavior of Teleost Fishes’. (Ed. T. J. Pitcher.) pp. 363–439. (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Rogers, C. , Roden, C. , Lohoefener, R. , Mullin, K. , and Hoggard, W. (1990). Behavior, distribution, and relative abundance of cownose ray schools Rhinoptera bonasus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Northeast Gulf Science 11, 69–76.
Sasko D. E. (2000). The prey capture behavior and kinematics of the cownose ray Rhinoptera bonasus. M.Sc. Thesis, University of South Florida, FL.

Sasko D.E., Dean M.N., Motta P.J, and Hueter R.E. (2006). Prey capture behaviour and kinematics of the Atlantic cownose ray. Rhinoptera bonasus. Zoology 109, 171–181.

Schwartz F. J. (1965). Inter-American migrations and systematics of the western Atlantic cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus. In ‘Association of Island Marine Laboratories of the Caribbean, Sixth Meeting’. p. 1. (Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita: Isla Margarita, Venezuela.)

Schwartz, F. J. (1990). Mass migratory congregations and movements of several species of cownose rays, genus Rhinoptera: A world-wide review. The Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 106, 10–13.
Smith H. M. (1907). ‘The Fishes of North Carolina.’ North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey 2. (E. M. Uzzell & Co.: Raleigh, NC.)

Smith, J. W. , and Merriner, J. V. (1985). Food habits and feeding behavior of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 8, 305–310.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Uebelacker J. M., and Johnson P. G. (1984). ‘Final Report to the Minerals Management Service, Contract # 14–12–001–29091.’ (Barry A. Vittor and Associates: Mobile, AL.)

Valentine, J. F. , Heck, K. L. , Harper, P. , and Beck, M. (1994). Effects of bioturbation in controlling seagrass (Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König) abundance: evidence from field enclosures and observations in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 178, 181–192.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang, J. C. S. , and Raney, E. C. (1971). Distribution and fluctuations in the fish fauna of the Charlotte Harbor Estuary, Florida. Mote Marine Laboratory Contributions 112, 1–21.