Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differential response of stream periphyton and invertebrate grazers to habitat modification by the emergent macrophyte Justicia americana

Ken M. Fritz A B C and Jack W. Feminella A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5407, USA.

B Present address: USEPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King, Mailstop 642, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: fritz.ken@epa.gov

Marine and Freshwater Research 57(2) 207-214 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05121
Submitted: 15 June 2005  Accepted: 16 January 2006   Published: 28 February 2006

Abstract

An instream experiment was conducted using artificial substrate tiles during summer to examine the relative importance of shading by the emergent macrophyte Justicia americana and top-down control by stream grazers on summer periphyton accrual. Macrophyte treatments included removal of above-ground stems, removal of stems and rhizomes and an unmanipulated control, whereas grazer treatments included snail-accessible and snail-exclusion tiles. Above-ground Justicia structures reduced both sunlight to the stream bed and velocity by almost 50%. Abundance of the dominant snail, Elimia ucheensis (Pleuroceridae), on snail-exclusion tiles was significantly lower than on snail-accessible tiles only during the first week of the experiment; therefore, the barriers were ineffective over the entire experiment. Despite ineffective reductions of Elimia abundance over the entire experiment, periphyton accrual was higher on snail-exclusion than snail-accessible tiles irrespective of macrophyte treatment. Among the macrophyte treatments, periphyton biomass (as ash-free dry mass) was significantly lower on tiles in the unmanipulated control than treatments where Justicia stems were removed. Higher mean differences and relative magnitude of effects were associated with the macrophyte treatments when compared with the grazer treatments. Periphyton appeared to be primarily light-limited by Justicia and secondarily controlled by grazing invertebrates; however, the effects of grazing may have been underestimated because snail-exclusion barriers were ineffective at reducing grazer abundance over the experiment. Removal of Justicia canopy did not result in higher abundance of any invertebrate grazers on tiles; however, the abundance of the freshwater limpet (Ferrissia mcneili) was twice as high on tiles within the more shaded Justicia control sections compared with either of the two open-canopy treatments. Habitat modification by Justicia can negatively affect benthic primary producers and influence the distribution of some, but not all, primary consumers.


Acknowledgments

We thank Ashley Evans Fritz, Stephanie Miller, and Kelly Maloney for field assistance, the Ross, Andrews, and Sumner families for access to the study sites, Dr David Bayne for field equipment, and Drs Jennifer Greenwood, Michael Griffith, Brent Johnson, David Walters and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This research was funded in part by an Auburn University Graduate Student Research Award to KMF, and the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. KMF was supported through the USEPA Federal post-doctoral program while preparing a portion of this manuscript.


References

Bertness, M. D. (1984). Ribbed mussels and Spartina alterniflora production in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 65, 1794–1807.
Bruno J. F., and Bertness M. D. (2001). Habitat modification and facilitation in benthic marine communities. In ‘Marine Community Ecology’. (Eds M. D. Bertness, S. D. Gaines and M. E. Hay.) pp. 201–218. (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)

Bunn, S. E. , Davies, P. M. , and Kellaway, D. M. (1997). Contributions of sugar cane and invasive pasture grass to the aquatic food web of a tropical lowland stream. Marine and Freshwater Research 48, 173–179.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Godfrey R. K., and Wooten J. W. (1981). ‘Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States.’ (University of Georgia Press: Athens, GA.)

Gregg, W. W. , and Rose, F. L. (1982). The effects of aquatic macrophytes on the stream microenvironment. Aquatic Botany 14, 309–324.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Steinman A. D., and Lamberti G. A. (1996). Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In ‘Methods in Stream Ecology’. (Eds F. R. Hauer and G. A. Lamberti.) pp. 295–337. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

Steinman, A. D. , McIntire, C. D. , Gregory, S. V. , Lamberti, G. A. , and Ashkenas, L. R. (1987). Effects of herbivore type and density on taxonomic structure and physiognomy of algal assemblages in laboratory streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 6, 175–188.
Underwood A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Wetzel R. G. (2001). ‘Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)