Heterotrophic bacterial production in the lower Murray River, south-eastern Australia
Gavin N. Rees A C , Gillian Beattie B , Patricia M. Bowen A and Barry T. Hart BA Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre and CRC for Freshwater Ecology, PO Box 991, Wodonga, Vic. 3689, Australia.
B Water Studies Centre and CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: gavin.rees@csiro.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 56(6) 835-841 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04232
Submitted: 30 August 2004 Accepted: 26 April 2005 Published: 27 September 2005
Abstract
Bacterial production is important in aquatic carbon cycles because it represents a key component whereby dissolved and particulate carbon can be recycled back into food webs. Despite its acknowledged importance, few studies have examined bacterial production in lowland rivers. Since studies have suggested bacterial production is closely related to some carbon pools, we anticipated this to be the case in the Murray River, but that the timing and type of carbon inputs in the Murray River may lead to bacterial dynamics that differ from studies from other sites. Bacterial abundance and production were measured at three contrasting sites of the lowland Murray River, south-eastern Australia, over an 18-month period. Bacterial abundance varied across the three sites on the Murray River and was correlated with chlorophyll a concentrations but not with temperature, nutrients, particulate organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Bacterial production also varied across the sites. Lowest production was at the site most immediately downstream of a large reservoir, with production generally ranging from 0.88 to 8.00 μg C L−1 h−1. Bacterial production in a reach within a large forest ranged from 4.00 to 17.38 μg C L−1 h−1. Production at the reach furthest downstream ranged from 1.04 to 23.50 μg C L−1 h−1. Bacterial production in the Murray River was generally greater than in the European River Spree, reaches of the Meuse and Rhine without immediate impacts from major urban centres and the Amazon River, but was similar to the concentration measured in the Mississippi and Hudson Rivers. Bacterial production was closely correlated with chlorophyll a concentration and total phosphorus, but not with temperature, dissolved organic carbon, particulate organic carbon or inorganic nitrogen. Despite the differences in production and respiration measured at different sites across the Murray River, bacterial growth efficiency was very similar at the three sites. Bacterial populations in the Murray River appear to be influenced by reach-specific conditions rather than broad-scale drivers such as temperature, carbon and nutrient concentrations.
Extra keywords: bacterial abundance, carbon, rivers.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology as part of project IP1. We thank John Pengelly for carrying out nutrient analyses. GB was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship.
Austin, H. K. , and Findlay, S. E. G. (1989). Benthic bacterial biomass and production in the Hudson River estuary. Microbial Ecology 18, 105–116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Findlay, S. , and Sinsbaugh, R. (1999). Unraveling the sources and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in lotic aquatic ecosystems. Marine and Freshwater Research 50, 781–790.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer, J. L. (1994). The microbial loop in flowing waters. Microbial Ecology 28, 195–199.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Connell, M. , Baldwin, D. S. , Robertson, A. I. , and Rees, G. N. (2000). Release and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter from floodplain litter: influence of origin and oxygen levels. Freshwater Biology 45, 333–342.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pace, M. L. , and Cole, J. J. (1994). Primary and bacterial production in lakes: are they coupled over depth? Journal of Plankton Research 16, 661–672.
Pollard, P. C. (2004). Organic carbon mineralisation in a subtropical river. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineralisation Processes 12, 505–514.
Pomeroy, L. (1974). The ocean’s food web, a changing paradigm. Bioscience 24, 499–504.
Servais, P. (1989). Bactrioplankton biomass and production in the River Meuse (Belgium). Hydrobiologia 174, 99–110.
Servais, P. , and Billen, G. (1989). Impact of a nuclear power plant on primary production and bacterial heterotrophic activity in the river Meuse at Tihange (Belgium). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 3, 415–430.
Servais, P. , and Garnier, J. (1993). Contribution of heterotrophic bacterial production to the carbon budget of the River Seine. Microbial Ecology 25, 19–33.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharma, R. , Edwards, R. T. , and Beckett, R. (1998). Analysis of bacteria in aquatic environments using sedimentation field-flow fractionation: (I) biomass determination. Water Research 32, 1497–1507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorp, J. H. , and Delong, M. D. (2002). Dominance of autochthonous carbon in food webs of heterotrophic rivers. Oikos 96, 543–550.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorp, J. H. , Delong, M. D. , Greenwood, K. S. , and Casper, A. F. (1998). Isotopic analysis of three food web theories in constricted and floodplain regions of a large river. Oecologia 117, 551–563.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webster, J. R. , and Meyer, J. L. (1997). Stream organic budgets. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16, 3–4.
White, P. A. , Kalff, J. , Rasmussen, J. B. , and Gasol, J. M. (1991). The effect of temperature and algal biomass on bacterial production and specific growth rate in freshwater and marine habitats. Microbial Ecology 21, 99–118.
