Disposable biocidal cubical curtains: can they prevent the transfer of bacterial pathogens?
Despina Kotsanas A D , Anita Lovegrove B , Tracy L. Sloane C and Elizabeth E. Gillespie BA Monash Infectious Diseases, Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.
B Infection Control and Epidemiology Unit, Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.
C Infection Control and Epidemiology Unit, Southern Health, Dandenong Hospital, Dandenong, Vic. 3175, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: despina.kotsanas@southernhealth.org.au
Healthcare Infection 17(3) 87-90 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI12015
Submitted: 1 May 2012 Accepted: 29 June 2012 Published: 26 July 2012
Abstract
Background: Potentially harmful bacteria have been shown to contaminate traditional cloth cubical curtains. Health care-associated bacteria may, therefore, have the potential to be transmitted from curtains to patients via the hands of health care workers, especially if hand hygiene is not adequate. Over the past few years disposable biocidal curtains have become available which can offer antimicrobial capabilities, less frequent changes, as well as cost savings on laundering.
Methods: Microbial testing was undertaken on two types of disposable polypropylene curtains: one coated with the biostatic agent didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride and the other coated with polysiloxane. Samples were inoculated with Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis), as well as a toxin-producing Clostridium difficile (containing spores). Finger imprints and curtain impressions were made on agar after 1 day, 10 days, 1 month and 2 months.
Results: Both types of curtains showed similar results. Gram-negative bacteria did not grow after 1 day but S. aureus and E. faecalis could be detected at 10 days with no growth thereafter. However, C. difficile persisted up to 2 months post sample contamination, most likely due to the persistence of spores.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that biocide-treated disposable curtains eliminated or reduced the number of hand-transferred bacteria tested; however, spore-forming C. difficile persisted for long periods of time in the environment. Therefore, newer biocide-treated disposable curtains need to contain sporicidal formulations in order to control contamination by this nosocomial pathogen.
References
[1] Trillis F, Eckstein EC, Budavich R, Pultz MJ, Donskey CJ. Contamination of hospital curtains with healthcare-associated pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 1074–6.| Contamination of hospital curtains with healthcare-associated pathogens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Woodland R, Whitham D, O’Neil B, Otter S. Microbiological contamination of cubicle curtains in an out-patient podiatry clinic. J Foot Ankle Res 2010; 3 26
| Microbiological contamination of cubicle curtains in an out-patient podiatry clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Ohl M, Schweizer M, Graham M, Heilmann K, Boyken L, Diekema D. Hospital privacy curtains are frequently and rapidly contaminated with potentially pathogenic bacteria. Am J Infect Control 2012;
| Hospital privacy curtains are frequently and rapidly contaminated with potentially pathogenic bacteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Klakus J, Vaughan NL, Boswell TC. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of hospital curtains. J Hosp Infect 2008; 68 189–90.
| Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of hospital curtains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7ltFOiuw%3D%3D&md5=0c8a672d26366b6e15219e588518b913CAS |
[5] Pittet D, Dharan S, Touveneau S, Sauvan V, Perneger TV. Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159 821–6.
| Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jsFegsQ%3D%3D&md5=9f556e36088a5c71c58af24fe5164278CAS |
[6] Pessoa-Silva CL, Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Touveneau S, Posfay-Barbe K, Pfister R, et al Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25 192–7.
| Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Rinck G. Comparison of antimicrobial and standard privacy curtains: efficacy and cost analysis. Am J Infect Control 2010; 38 e14
| Comparison of antimicrobial and standard privacy curtains: efficacy and cost analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Campden BRI. Evaluation of surfaces for their growth inhibition of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and Escherichia coli using a modified Kirby Bauer test. Chipping Campden, UK: Campden BRI; 2009.
[9] Endurocide Bio Technics. Available from: www.endurobiotech.com [verified February 2012].
[10] Perry JD, Asir K, Halimi D, Orenga S, Dale J, Payne M, et al Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 3852–8.
| Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Sattar SA, Springthorpe S, Mani S, Gallant M, Nair RC, Scott E, et al Transfer of bacteria from fabrics to hands and other fabrics: development and application of a quantitative method using Staphylococcus aureus as a model. J Appl Microbiol 2001; 90 962–70.
| Transfer of bacteria from fabrics to hands and other fabrics: development and application of a quantitative method using Staphylococcus aureus as a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmtVCitg%3D%3D&md5=8e8008c882393ba8194f169bd6fe85a6CAS |
[12] Neely AN. A survey of gram-negative bacteria survival on hospital fabrics and plastics. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000; 21 523–7.
| A survey of gram-negative bacteria survival on hospital fabrics and plastics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jvFSktA%3D%3D&md5=13c557864443118495483717494ac5b9CAS |
[13] Neely AN, Maley MP. Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38 724–6.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7it1Cmsw%3D%3D&md5=248715df1a3717878af100700520de17CAS |
[14] Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6 130
| How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Speight S, Moy A, Macken S, Chitnis R, Hoffman PN, Davies A, et al Evaluation of the sporicidal activity of different chemical disinfectants used in hospitals against Clostridium difficile. J Hosp Infect 2011; 79 18–22.
| Evaluation of the sporicidal activity of different chemical disinfectants used in hospitals against Clostridium difficile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MjmtFCntw%3D%3D&md5=f2bda80ea81fda5e4b7e9158b12f784bCAS |
[16] Hota B. Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection? Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39 1182–9.
| Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |