Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Hand profiling: A novel tool used to demonstrate hand hygiene technique

Elizabeth Gillespie A D , Despina Kotsanas B , Jill Wilson A , Michael Buist C and Rhonda Stuart A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Southern Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.

B Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.

C Rural Clinical School, University of Tasmania, Wilson Street, Burnie, Tas. 7320, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: elizabeth.gillespie@southernhealth.org.au

Healthcare Infection 14(4) 153-157 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI09022
Published: 21 December 2009

Abstract

Hand hygiene is the most important measure to prevent hospital-acquired infection, yet hand hygiene compliance rates are poor in intensive care units (ICUs). Hand profiling using fingertip imprints was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of alcohol hand rub (AHR) on reducing bacterial carriage and to assess AHR application as an additional educational tool in the ICU setting. At each hand hygiene opportunity, fingertip imprints, from both hands of the Director of the ICU, were plated and organisms cultured during a patient examination. Micro-organisms were counted and speciated. Hands were examined for general condition and details documented. After presenting the evidence of the value of appropriate hand hygiene to the unit head, the plating activity (hand profiling) was made available to any ICU staff. Nearly twice the number of micro-organisms were plated from the dominant hand fingertips of the Director of the ICU compared with his non-dominant hand. Following the application of AHR, the number of organisms reduced but the right thumb consistently grew micro-organisms. An examination of his hand hygiene technique demonstrated the need to focus on his right thumb when applying AHR. Sixty-five ICU and visiting clinical staff participated in assessing hand hygiene technique after AHR application. Twenty-four staff were recommended for follow-up review of their hand hygiene technique. Through hand profiling, an improvement in application of AHR was demonstrated after the technique was corrected. Hand profiling is a useful educational tool and could be made available to clinical staff to maximise the efficacy of AHR application.


Acknowledgement

This study was funded by an Australian Infection Control Association Covidien Scholarship


References


[1] Pittet D. Compliance with hand disinfection and its impact on hospital-acquired infections. J Hosp Infect 2001; 48(Supplement A): S40–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (last accessed December 2008).

[5] National Health and Medical Research Council. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. http://www.nhmrc.publications@nhmrc.gov.au (last accessed December 2008).

[6] Pittet D,  Dharan S,  Touveneau S,  Sauvan V,  Perneger T. Bacterial contamination of the hand of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159 821–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[7] Pessoa-Silva C,  Dharan S,  Hugonnet S,  Touveneau S,  Posfay-Barbe K,  Pfister R, et al. Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25 192–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[8] Murray PR , Baron E , Jorgensen JH , Pfaller MA , Yolken RH , eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th edn. 2003 ASM Press, Washington, DC.

[9] Gillespie E. ten Berk de Boar F, Stuart R, Buist M, Wilson J. A sustained reduction in the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc 2007; 9 161–5.
PubMed |

[10] Brunetti L,  Santoro E,  De Caro F,  Cavallo P,  Boccia G,  Capunzo M, et al. Surveillance of nosocomial infections: a preliminary study on hand hygiene compliance of healthcare workers. J Prev Med Hyg 2006; 47 64–8.
CAS | PubMed |

[11] Lucet J,  Rigard M,  Mentre F,  Kassis N,  Deblangy C,  Andremont A, et al. Hand contamination before and after different hand hygiene techniques: a randomised clinical trial. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50 276–80.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Trick W,  Vernon M,  Hayes R,  Nathan C,  Rice TW,  Peterson BJ, et al. Impact of wearing a ring on hand hygiene contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36 1383–90.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] Pittet D. Commentary: hand hygiene: it’s all about when and how. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29(10): 957–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Laustsen S,  Lund E,  Bibby B,  Kristensen B,  Thulstrup AM,  Kjølseth Møller J. Effect of correctly using alcohol-based hand rub in a clinical setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29(10): 954–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[15] Moolenaar R,  Crutcher M,  San Joaquin V,  Sewell L,  Hutwagner L,  Carson L, et al. A prolonged outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Neonatal Intensive Care unit: Did staff fingernails play a role in disease transmission? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21 80–5.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |