Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Specifications for temperature and humidity in sterile storage environments – Where’s the evidence?

Terry McAuley
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

STEAM Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, PO Box 100, Endeavour Hills, Vic. 3802, Australia. Email: terry@steamconsulting.com.au

Healthcare Infection 14(4) 131-137 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI09020
Published: 21 December 2009

Abstract

The concept of event-related sterility for storage of medical devices is widely applied in Australian healthcare facilities. This paper reviews available literature, international standards and guidance documents with respect to the concept of event-related sterility in order to determine: (i) why commercially produced sterile medical devices may withstand adverse temperature and humidity conditions better than items produced in a Sterile Services Department; (ii) what effects temperature and humidity have on maintenance of sterility; and (iii) whether temperature and humidity conditions specified in AS/NZS4187:2003 are evidence-based and whether changes to these could be made in any future revisions. The literature review revealed that manufacturers of commercially available sterile medical devices are subject to stringent medical device regulations that require them to ensure that the devices remain both fit for purpose and sterile until use. This necessitates that manufacturers conduct accelerated ageing and environmental challenge tests to establish and justify the expiry dates given on the package label. The review also found a variety of specifications for temperature and humidity and the guidance documents gave no indication of evidence used as a basis for these requirements. In addition, it was apparent that many published studies on event-related sterility did not include consideration of the effect of temperature and humidity on the duration of sterility. After examination of a range of published material, it was concluded that the specifications in any future edition of AS/NZS4187 could be expanded to a temperature range of 16–25°C and a relative humidity range of 30–75%.


Acknowledgement

With thanks and in recognition of the Sul Stuart Fraser Scholarship awarded me by the College of Nursing, facilitating my participation in the Master of Science Medical Device Decontamination program offered by the University of Highlands and Islands, Scotland.


References


[1] Standards Australia. Cleaning, disinfecting and sterilizing reusable medical and surgical instruments and equipment and maintenance of the associated environment in healthcare facilities. AS/NZS4187:2003 Homebush; SAI Global.

[2] Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee [PIDAC] Best Practices for Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization in All Health Care Settings . 2006 [online] Available from http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/infectious/diseases/ic_cds.html last accessed 16 April 2009

[3] Canadian Standards Association [CSA] Consensus Statement re: High Relative Humidity in Sterile Storage Areas . 2007 [online] Available from http://www.csao.net/files/pdfs/High%20Humidity%20in%20Sterile%20Storage%20CSA%20July%202007.pdf last accessed 17 April 2009

[4] Belkin NL . Wrapping for event-related shelf-life. Healthcare Purchasing News March 2004 [online] Available from http://www.hpnonline.com last accessed 4 May 2009

[5] Medical Devices Regulations (2002) SI 2002/3017 [online] Available from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1994/Uksi_19943017_en_1.htm last accessed 20th December 2007

[6] International Organisation for Standardisation. Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices – Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems. ISO11607–1:2006. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.

[7] Sterilization Packaging Manufacturers Council [SPMC] Sterile Packaging: The facts of Shelf Life . 2006 [online] Available from http://www.medicaldevice-network.com/features/feature245/ last accessed 27 April 2009

[8] Sterilization Packaging Manufacturers Council. The role of humidity on the accelerated ageing of sterilizable medical packaging. 2007 [online] Available from http://faq.sterilizationpackaging.org/category/28 last accessed 27 April 2009

[9] Herman P , Larsen C . ‘Measuring Porous Microbial Barriers Part 1.’ Medical Devices and Diagnostic Industry 2008 [online] Available from http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/categories/Packaging.html last accessed May 2009

[10] Herman P , Larsen C . ‘Measuring Porous Microbial Barriers Part 2.’ Medical Devices and Diagnostic Industry 2008 [online] Available from http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/categories/Packaging.html last accessed 5 May 2009

[11] Rutala W , Weber D . Choosing a Sterilization Wrap for Surgical Packs . 2000 [online] Available at http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/ last accessed 16 April 2009

[12] Dunkelberg H,  Rohmann S. Test to Determine Sterile Integrity of Wrapped Medical Products at a Probability of Recontamination of 1 : 1,000,000. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; 27(4): 367–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | last accessed 27 April 2009

[14] Tallentire A. Effect of temperature and humidity on sterility maintenance . 2007 [Email] to McGain F. [18th July 2007]

[15] Sterile Processing University. Event-related sterility – What’s it all about anyway ? 2007 [online] Available from http://www.spdceus.com/event_related.htm last accessed 16 April 2009

[16] Widmer AF,  Houston A,  Bollinger E,  Wenzel RP. A new standard for sterility testing of autoclaved surgical trays. J Hosp Infect 1992; 21 253–60.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | last accessed 16 April 2009

[22] Dunkelberg H,  Fleitmann-Glende F. ‘Measurement of the microbial barrier effectiveness of sterilization containers in terms of the log reduction value for prevention of nosocomial infections.’ Am J Infect Control 2006; 34 285–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | last accessed 26 April 2009

[26] Australasian Health Infrastructure Alliance. Australasian Health Facility Guidelines. 2007 [online] Available from http://www.healthfacilityguidelines.com.au/ last accessed 8 May 2009

[27] Department of Health. Health Building Note 13. Sterile Services Department . 2004 London; The Stationary Office.

[28] Steering Committee for Decontamination of Reusable Invasive Medical Devices [SCDRIMD] Health Service Executive Code of Practice for Decontamination of Reusable Invasive Medical Devices. Part 3: Recommended Practices for Central Decontamination Units . 2007 [online] Available from http://www.hse.ie last accessed 16 April 2009

[29] National Health Service Scotland. Health Technical Memorandum 2010. Part 5 of 6. Good practice guide. Sterilization . 2001.

[30] Centers for Disease Control [CDC] Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities. 2008 [online] Available from http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/infectious/diseases/ic_cds.html last accessed 16 April 2009

[31] Association of peri-Operating Registered Nurses [AORN] ‘Recommended Practices for Selection and Use of Packaging Systems for Sterilization.’ AORN J 2007; 85(4): 801–12.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | last accessed 17 April 2009

[33] Cook Medical. Sterilization of Reusable Products . 2009 [online] Available from http://www.cookmedical.com/help.do?id=456 last accessed 26 April 2009