An exploratory study identifying where local government public health decision makers source their evidence for policy
Melissa Stoneham A C and James Dodds BA Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
B Environmental Health Directorate, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Grace Vaughan House, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, WA 6008, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: m.stoneham@curtin.edu.au
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 25(2) 139-142 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE14012
Submitted: 6 March 2014 Accepted: 14 May 2014 Published: 9 September 2014
Abstract
Issue addressed: The Western Australian (WA) Public Health Bill will replace the antiquated Health Act 1911. One of the proposed clauses of the Bill requires all WA local governments to develop a Public Health Plan. The Bill states that Public Health Plans should be based on evidence from all levels, including national and statewide priorities, community needs, local statistical evidence, and stakeholder data.
Methods: This exploratory study, which targeted 533 WA local government officers, aimed to identify the sources of evidence used to generate the list of public health risks to be included in local government Public Health Plans.
Results: The top four sources identified for informing local policy were: observation of the consequences of the risks in the local community (24.5%), statewide evidence (17.6%), local evidence (17.6%) and coverage in local media (16.2%).
Conclusions: This study confirms that both hard and soft data are used to inform policy decisions at the local level. Therefore, the challenge that this study has highlighted is in the definition or constitution of evidence.
So what?: Evidence is critical to the process of sound policy development. This study highlights issues associated with what actually constitutes evidence in the policy development process at the local government level. With the exception of those who work in an extremely narrow field, it is difficult for local government officers, whose role includes policymaking, to read the vast amount of information that has been published in their area of expertise. For those who are committed to the notion of evidence-based policymaking, as advocated within the WA Public Health Bill, this presents a considerable challenge.
References
[1] Stoneham M, Robinson M, Daube M. Public health planning – a guide to developing a local public health plan. Perth: Public Health Advocacy Institute of WA, Curtin University, Western Australia; 2010.[2] Reynolds C (2003) Public health law in the new century. J Law Med 10, 435–41.
[3] Department of Health. Western Australia. WA Health Promotion Strategic Framework 2012–2016. Perth: Chronic Disease Prevention Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia; 2012.
[4] Department of Health. Western Australia. Environmental Health Directorate yearbook 2012. Perth: Environmental Health Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia; 2013.
[5] Davies P. Is evidence-based government possible? Jerry Lee Lecture presented at the 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC; 2004.
[6] Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A (2009) SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst 7, S1
| SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20018099PubMed |
[7] Last JM, editors. A dictionary of epidemiology, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
[8] Rosales R, Stallones L (2008) Coverage of motor vehicle crashes with injuries in U.S. newspapers, 1999–2002. J Safety Res 39, 477–82.
| Coverage of motor vehicle crashes with injuries in U.S. newspapers, 1999–2002.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Yankson IK, Browne ENL, Tagbor H, Donkor P, Quansah R, Asare GE, et al (2010) Reporting on road traffic injury: content analysis of injuries and prevention opportunities in Ghanaian newspapers. Inj Prev 16, 194–7.
| Reporting on road traffic injury: content analysis of injuries and prevention opportunities in Ghanaian newspapers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20570987PubMed |
[10] Cook FL, Tyler TR, Goetz EG, Gordon M, Proless D, Leff D, et al (1983) Media and agenda setting: effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opin Q 47, 16–35.
| Media and agenda setting: effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3ksl2ruw%3D%3D&md5=89d9dce659a62e191c9e6372437d8a6aCAS | 10261275PubMed |
[11] Wallack L, Dorfman L (1996) Media advocacy: a strategy for advancing policy and promoting health. Health Educ Q 23, 293–317.
| Media advocacy: a strategy for advancing policy and promoting health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28vjvFGjsA%3D%3D&md5=d263732c85e7836499bb5793c4e93179CAS | 8841816PubMed |
[12] Cooper BE, Lee WE, Goldacre BM, Sanders TA (2012) The quality of the evidence for dietary advice given in UK national newspapers. Public Underst Sci 21, 664–73.
| The quality of the evidence for dietary advice given in UK national newspapers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23832153PubMed |
[13] Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A (2006) Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst 4, –19.
| Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17156460PubMed |
