The fly-in, fly out debate: what happens to the communities?
Sharyn Burns
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Western Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. Email: S.Burns@curtin.edu.au
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 24(2) 158-158 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13056
Submitted: 6 July 2013 Accepted: 22 July 2013 Published: 26 August 2013
References
[1] House of Representatives and Standing Committee on Regional Australia. Cancer of the bush or salvation of our cities? Fly-in, fly-out and drive-in, drive-out workforce practices in regional Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.[2] Weeramanthri T, Jancey J (2013) Fly-in-, fly-out (FIFO) work in Australia: the need for research and a health promotion framework. Health Promot J Austr 24, 5–6.
[3] Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social epidemiology. Social cohesion, social capital and health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
[4] Germov J. The class origins of health inequality. In Germov J, editor. Second opinion: an introduction to health sociology (pp. 85–110). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2009.
[5] Piotrowski D. The towns where a pub steak costs you $45. news.com.au 27 February 2013. Available from: http://www.news.com.au/money/cost-of-living/the-towns-where-a-pub- steak-costs-you-50/story-fnagkbpv-1226586764308#ixzz2WjaBULYL [Verified 6 June 2013].
[6] Morris R. Scoping study: impact of fly-in, fly-out/drive-in, drive-out work practices on local government. Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology; 2012.
