Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mode of photosynthesis during different life stages of hemiepiphytic Clusia species

Wolfgang Wanek, Werner Huber, Stefan K. Arndt and Marianne Popp

Functional Plant Biology 29(6) 725 - 732
Published: 28 June 2002

Abstract

This paper originates from a presentation at the IIIrd International Congress on Crassulacean Acid Metabolism, Cape Tribulation, Queensland, Australia, August 2001.

Carbon isotope fractionation and nocturnal acid accumulation in Clusia osaensis Hammel-ined., C.  peninsulae Hammel-ined. and C. valerii Standl. were investigated during the seedling, epiphytic and hemiepiphytic phases in a lowland tropical forest in Costa Ricato study photosynthetic adaptations of different plant growth stages to their habitat. Foliar δ 13C values around -24 to -32‰ indicate predominant C3 fixation of CO2 and low crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) activity in all three Clusia species. Only terrestrially rooted plants of C. osaensis showed increased CAM expression. However, all developmental stages exhibited significant CAM cycling as shown by significant day-night fluctuations of titratable protons and of malic and citric acid. In C. valerii and C. peninsulae, an increase in CAM expression with plant development was not observed, and CAM cycling in hemiepiphytic-stage plants was completely repressed during the high rainfall season. The expression of CAM in the three Clusia species is therefore not developmentally controlled but triggered by environmental factors such as water availability and light intensity. These factors remain relatively stable in this ecosystem and CAM is therefore not fully expressed. However, CAM cycling may be of ecophysiological significance in all life stages as it serves as a mechanism to improve carbon economy by reducing respiratory CO2 losses.

Keywords: 13C, C3, CAM, CAM cycling, citric acid, isotope discrimination, ontogeny, malic acid.

https://doi.org/10.1071/PP01206

© CSIRO 2002

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions