Measuring residual transpiration in plants: a comparative analysis of different methods
Md. Hasanuzzaman A B , Koushik Chakraborty A C , Meixue Zhou A and Sergey Shabala A D E *A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
Residual transpiration (RT) is defined as a loss of water through the leaf cuticle while stomata are closed. Reduced RT might be a potentially valuable trait for improving plant performance under water deficit conditions imposed by either drought or salinity. Due to the presence of stomata on the leaf surface, it is technically challenging to measure RT. RT has been estimated by the water loss through either astomatous leaf surface or isolated astomatous cuticular layers. This approach is not suitable for all species (e.g. not applicable to grasses) and is difficult and too time consuming for large-scale screening in breeding programs. Several alternative methods may be used to quantify the extent of RT; each of them comes with its own advantages and limitations. In this study, we have undertaken a comparative assessment of eight various methods of assessing RT, using barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants as a model species. RT measured by water retention curves and a portable gas exchange (infrared gas analyser; IRGA) system had low resolution and were not able to differentiate between RT rates from young and old leaves. Methods based on quantification of the water loss at several time-points were found to be the easiest and least time-consuming compared to others. Of these, the ‘three time-points water loss’ method is deemed as the most suitable for the high throughput screening of plant germplasm for RT traits.
Keywords: barley, climate change, cuticle, drought, phenotyping, salinity, stomata, transpiration.
References
Boyer JS (2015) Turgor and the transport of CO2 and water across the cuticle (epidermis) of leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 2625-2633.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Boyer JS, Wong SC, Farquhar GD (1997) CO2 and water vapor exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiology 114, 185-191.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Burghardt M, Riederer M (2003) Ecophysiological relevance of cuticular transpiration of deciduous and evergreen plants in relation to stomatal closure and leaf water potential. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1941-1949.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cape JN, Percy KE (1996) The interpretation of leaf-drying curves. Plant, Cell & Environment 19, 356-361.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clarke JM, McCaig TN (1982) Excised-leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62, 571-578.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clarke JM, Richards RA, Condon AG (1991) Effect of drought stress on residual transpiration and its relationship with water use of wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 695-702.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Darwish DS, Fahmy GM (1997) Transpiration decline curves and stomatal characteristics of faba bean genotypes. Biologia Plantarum 39, 243-249.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
David M (2010) Water loss from excised leaves in a collection of Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum cultivars. Romanian Agricultural Research 27, 27-34.
| Google Scholar |
Fricke W (2019) Night-time transpiration – favouring growth? Trends in Plant Science 24, 311-317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Golestani Araghi S, Assad M (1998) Evaluation of four screening techniques for drought resistance and their relationship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica 103, 293-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
González A, Ayerbe L (2010) Effect of terminal water stress on leaf epicuticular wax load, residual transpiration and grain yield in barley. Euphytica 172, 341-349.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hasanuzzaman M, Shabala L, Zhou M, Brodribb TJ, Corkrey R, Shabala S (2018) Factors determining stomatal and non-stomatal (residual) transpiration and their contribution towards salinity tolerance in contrasting barley genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 153, 10-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hoad SP, Grace J, Jeffree CE (1996) A leaf disc method for measuring cuticular conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 431-437.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jetter R, Riederer M (2016) Localization of the transpiration barrier in the epi- and intracuticular waxes of eight plant species: water transport resistances are associated with fatty acyl rather than alicyclic components. Plant Physiology 170, 921-934.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Jordan GJ, Brodribb TJ (2007) Incontinence in aging leaves: deteriorating water relations with leaf age in Agastachys odorata (Proteaceae), a shrub with very long-lived leaves. Functional Plant Biology 34(10), 918-924.
| Google Scholar |
Karbulková J, Schreiber L, Macek P, Šantrůček J (2008) Differences between water permeability of astomatous and stomatous cuticular membranes: effects of air humidity in two species of contrasting drought-resistance strategy. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 3987-3995.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kerstiens G (1996) Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1813-1832.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ (2014) Separating active and passive influences on stomatal control of transpiration. Plant Physiology 164, 1578-1586.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McCaig T, Romagosa I (1989) Measurement and use of excised-leaf water status in wheat. Crop Science 29, 1140-1145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Petcu E (2005) The effect of water stress on cuticular transpiration and relationships with winter wheat yield. Romanian Agricultural Research 22, 15-19.
| Google Scholar |
Petcu E, Schitea M, Cîrstea VE (2009) The effect of water stress on cuticular transpiration and its association with alfalfa yield. Romanian Agricultural Research 26, 53-56.
| Google Scholar |
Quisenberry JE, Roark B, McMichael BL (1982) Use of transpiration decline curves to identify drought-tolerant cotton germplasm. Crop Science 22, 918-922.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rawson HM, Clarke JM (1988) Nocturnal transpiration in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 15, 397-406.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Riederer M, Schreiber L (2001) Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 2023-2032.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Santesteban LG, Miranda C, Royo JB (2009) Effect of water deficit and rewatering on leaf gas exchange and transpiration decline of excised leaves of four grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 121, 434-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schreiber L (2001) Effect of temperature on cuticular transpiration of isolated cuticular membranes and leaf discs. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 1893-1900.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Schreiber L, Riederer M (1996) Ecophysiology of cuticular transpiration: comparative investigation of cuticular water permeability of plant species from different habitats. Oecologia 107, 426-432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Schönherr J, Lendzian K (1981) A simple and inexpensive method of measuring water permeability of isolated plant cuticular membranes. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 102, 321-327.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schönherr J (1982) Resistance of plant surfaces to water loss: transport properties of cutin, suberin and associated lipids. In ‘Physiological Plant Ecology II. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (New Series)’. (Eds OL Lange, PS Nobel, CB Osmond, H Ziegler) pp. 153–179. (Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany)
Xu HL, Gauthier L, Gosselin A (1995) Stomatal and cuticular transpiration of greenhouse tomato plants in response to high solution electrical conductivity and low soil water content. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 120, 417-422.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhang Y, Chen X, Du Z, Zhang W, Devkota AR, Chen Z, Chen C, Sun W, Chen M (2020) A proposed method for simultaneous measurement of cuticular transpiration from different leaf surfaces in Camellia sinensis. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |