Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

In situ detection of Esr proteins secretion during maize microspore embryogenesis and their secretion blockage show effects on the culture progression

Pilar S. Testillano A C , María-José Coronado A , Anne-Marie Thierry B , Elisabeth Matthys-Rochon B and María C. Risueño A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Plant Development and Nuclear Architecture, Biological Research Centre, CIB-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.

B Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, ENS Lyon, UMR5667, CNRS/INRA/ENS/LYON 1, 46 Alleé d’Italie, F-69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France.

C Corresponding author. Email: testillano@cib.csic.es

Functional Plant Biology 37(10) 985-994 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP10066
Submitted: 24 March 2010  Accepted: 5 July 2010   Published: 23 September 2010

Abstract

In vitro plant cells in culture release proteins and carbohydrates, but the active molecules responsible for sustaining the switch in embryogenic development and progression have not yet been identified. In maize (Zea mays L.), the Esr genes encode for small hydrophilic proteins and are expressed in the restricted region of maize endosperm surrounding the embryo: the embryo surrounding region (ESR). In the present work, the possible influence of secreted molecules in the liquid medium during microspore-derived embryo development and specifically, the presence of Esr proteins, has been analysed in maize microspore cultures. The study has been conducted with in situ monitoring of the structural and cellular organisation of developing embryos and the subcellular localisation of the Esr proteins by immunofluorescence and immunogold labelling. The results obtained using confocal and electron microscopy revealed that Esr proteins were localised in elements of the secretory pathway and cell walls in microspore-derived embryo cells during early embryogenesis. Esr proteins were also detected in the liquid medium of maize microspore cultures and accumulated at 20 days of culture. Tunicamycin treatment to block protein glycosilation and, therefore, secretion inhibited microspore-derived embryo development, which was subsequently recovered by supplementation with medium containing all the secreted factors from a well developed microspore culture. Esr labelling was not present in non-developing microspore embryos of cultures treated with tunicamycin, whereas labelling was present again in the Golgi elements and secretory vesicles of embryo cells when development was restored. The results indicate that Esr proteins are part of the secreted proteins, which show a nursing or signalling role during in vitro embryo development in maize microspore embryogenesis cultures and provide new evidence for an endosperm-like function of microspore-derived embryo structures during the early stages.

Additional keywords: embryo development, endosperm surrounding region, plant peptides, pollen embryogenesis, signalling, tunicamycin, Zea mays.


Acknowledgements

Work supported by projects granted by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) BFU2008–00203 and AGL2008–04255. MJC was a recipient of a postdoctoral contract at the CIB funded by the program ‘Juan de la Cierva’ of the Spanish MICINN. Thanks are due to Dr T Gaude and Dr P Rogowsky (ENS, Lyon, France) for kindly providing us with the anti-Esr antibody and for fruitful scientific discussions.


References


Balandín M, Royo J, Gómez E, Muniz L, Molina A, Hueros G (2005) A protective role for the embryo surrounding region of the maize endosperm, as evidenced by the characterisation of ZmESR-6, a defensin gene specifically expressed in this region. Plant Molecular Biology 58, 269–282.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bate NJ, Niu XP, Wang YW, Reimann KS, Helentjaris TG (2004) An invertase inhibitor from maize localizes to the embryo surrounding region during early kernel development. Plant Physiology 134, 246–254.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bisseling T (1999) The role of plant peptides in intercellular signalling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 365–368.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bonello J-F, Opsahl-Ferstad H-G, Perez P, Dumas C, Rogowsky PM (2000) Esr genes show different levels of expression in the same region of maize endosperm. Gene 246, 219–227.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bonello J-F, Sevilla-Lecoq S, Berne A, Risueno MC, Dumas C, Rogowsky P (2002) Esr proteins are secreted by the cells of the embryo surrounding region. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1559–1568.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Borderies G, le Béchec M, Rossignol M, Lafitte C, leDeunff E, Beckert M, Dumas C, Matthys-Rochon E (2004) Characterization of proteins secreted during microspore culture: arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) stimulate embryo development. European Journal of Cell Biology 83, 205–212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Brown RC , Lemmon B , Doan D , Linnestad C , Olsen O-A (1996) The reprogrammed embryo: the endosperm as a quick route to understanding embryogenesis. In ‘Embryogenesis, the generation of a plant’. (Eds TL Wang, A Cuming) pp. 159–172. (BIOS Scientific Publishers: Oxford)

Butenko MA, Vie AK, Brembu T, Aalen RB, Bones AM (2009) Plant peptides in signalling: looking for new partners. Trends in Plant Science 14, 255–263.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Chupeau Y , Caboche M , Henry Y (1998) ‘Androgenesis and haploid plants.’ (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Coronado MJ, Testillano PS, Wilson C, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E, Risueño MC (2007) The in situ molecular identification of the Ntf4-MAP kinase expression sites in maturing and germinating pollen. Biology of the Cell 99, 209–221.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Custers JBM, Cordewener JHG, Nollen Y, Dons HJM, Campagne MMV (1994) Temperature controls both gametophytic and sporophytic development in microspore cultures of Brassica napus. Plant Cell Reports 13, 267–271.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dresselhaus T (2006) Cell–cell communication during double fertilization. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9, 41–47.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Dumas C, Rogowsky P (2008) Fertilization and early seed formation. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331, 715–725.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A (2007) The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 12, 368–375.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Gaillard A, Vergne P, Beckert M (1991) Optimization of maize microspore isolation and culture conditions for reliable plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 10, 55–58.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

González-Melendi P, Ramírez C, Testillano PS, Kumlehn J, Risueño MC (2005) 3D confocal and electron microscopy imaging define the dynamics and mechanisms of diploidization at early stages of barley microspore-derived embryogenesis. Planta 222, 47–57.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Goralski G, Matthys-Rochon E, Vergne P, Przywara L (1999) Androgenetic development: a fascinating embryo formation process. Acta Biologica Cracoviensa 41, 51–65. open url image1

Goralski G, Lafitte C, Bouazza L, Matthys-Rochon E, Przywara L (2002) Influence of sugars on isolated microspore development in maize (Zea mays L). Acta Biologica Cracoviensa 44, 203–212. open url image1

Kragh KM, Jacobsen S, Mikkelsen JD, Nielsen KA (1991) Purification and characterization of 3 chitinases and one beta-1,3-glucanase accumulating in the medium of cell-suspension cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Science 76, 65–77.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Magnard JL, Le Deunff E, Domenech J, Rogowsky PM, Testillano PS, Rougier M, Risueño MC, Vergne P, Dumas C (2000) Genes normally expressed in the endosperm are expressed at early stages of microspore embryogenesis in maize. Plant Molecular Biology 44, 559–574.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Maluszynski M , Kasha KJ , Forster BP , Szarejko I (2003) ‘Doubled haploid production in crop plants, a manual.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers)

Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M (2005) Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 1711–1726.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Marin-Olivier M, Chevalier T, Fobis-Loisy I, Dumas C, Gaude T (2000) Aquaporin PIP genes are not expressed in the stigma papillae in Brassica oleracea. The Plant Journal 24, 231–240.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Massonneau A, Coronado MJ, Audran A, Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Mol R, Testillano PS, Goralski G, Dumas C, Risueño MC, Matthys-Rochon E (2005) Multicellular structures that develop during in vitro maize pollen embryogenesis express both endosperm- and embryo-specific genes: which is which? European Journal of Cell Biology 84, 663–675.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Olsen O-A, Brown RC, Lemmon BE (1995) Pattern and process of wall formation in developing endosperm. BioEssays 17, 803–812.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Opsahl-Ferstad H-G, Le Deunff E, Dumas C, Rogowsky PM (1997) ZmESR, a novel endosperm specific gene expressed in a restricted region around the maize embryo. The Plant Journal 12, 235–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Paire A, Devaux P, Lafitte C, Dumas C, Matthys-Rochon E (2003) Proteins produced by barley microsporas and their derived androgenic structures promote in vitro zygotic maize embryo formation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 73, 167–176.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raghavan V (2000) ‘Developmental biology of flowering plants.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Sevilla-Lecoq S, Deguerry F, Matthys-Rochon E, Perez P, Dumas C, Rogowsky PM (2003) Analysis of ZmAE3 upstream sequences in maize endosperm and androgenic embryos. Sexual Plant Reproduction 16, 1–8. open url image1

Sharma VK, Ramirez J, Fletcher JC (2003) The Arabidopsis CLV3-like (CLE) genes are expressed in diverse tissues and encode secreted proteins. Plant Molecular Biology 51, 415–425.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang JC (1999) Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 410–418.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Testillano PS, Ramírez C, Domenech J, Matthys-Rochon E, Risueño MC (2002) Young microspore-derived maize embryos show two domains with defined features also present in zigotic embryogenesis. The International Journal of Developmental Biology 46, 1035–1047.
PubMed |
open url image1

Testillano PS, Georgiev S, Mogensen L, Coronado MJ, Dumas C, Risueño MC, Matthys-Rochon E (2004) Spontaneous chromosome doubling results from nuclear fusion during in vitro maize induced microspore embryogenesis. Chromosoma 112, 342–349.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Touraev A, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E (1997) Initiation of microspore embryogenesis by stress. Trends in Plant Science 2, 297–302.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

van Hengel AJ, Guzzo F, van Kammen A, de Vries SC (1998) Expression pattern of the carrot EP3 in suspensión cultures and in developing seeds. Plant Physiology 117, 43–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Vicente O, Moreno RM, Heberle-Bors E (1991) Pollen cultures as a tool to study plant development. Cell Biology Reviews 25, 295–306.
PubMed |
open url image1

Wang G, Fiers M (2010) CLE peptide signalling during plant development. Protoplasma 240, 33–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1