Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mechanisms linking plant productivity and water status for a temperate Eucalyptus forest flux site: analysis over wet and dry years with a simple model

David A. Pepper A E , Ross E. McMurtrie A , Belinda E. Medlyn B , Heather Keith C and Derek Eamus D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

B Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.

C The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

D Institute for Water and Environmental Resource Management and Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: d.a.pepper@unsw.edu.au

F This paper originates from a presentation at EcoFIZZ 2007, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia, September 2007.

Functional Plant Biology 35(6) 493-508 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08125
Submitted: 14 April 2008  Accepted: 4 June 2008   Published: 4 August 2008

Abstract

A simple process-based model was applied to a tall Eucalyptus forest site over consecutive wet and dry years to examine the importance of different mechanisms linking productivity and water availability. Measured soil moisture, gas flux (CO2, H2O) and meteorological records for the site were used. Similar levels of simulated H2O flux in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ years were achieved when water availability was not confined to the first 1.20 m of the soil profile, but was allowed to exceed it. Although the simulated effects of low soil and atmospheric water content on CO2 flux, presumably via reduction in stomatal aperture, also acted on transpiration, they were offset in the dry year by a higher vapour-pressure deficit. A sensitivity analysis identified the processes that were important in wet versus dry years, and on an intra-annual timeframe. Light-limited productivity dominated in both years, except for the driest period in the dry year. Vapour-pressure deficit affected productivity across more of each year than soil moisture, but both effects were larger in the dry year. The introduction of a reduced leaf area tended to decrease sensitivity in the dry year. Plant hydraulic architecture that increases plant available water, maximises productivity per unit water use and achieves lower sensitivity to low soil moisture levels should minimise production losses during dry conditions.

Additional keywords: CO2 flux, drought, evapotranspiration, water flux, water use.


Acknowledgements

D. A. Pepper, R. E. McMurtrie and B. E. Medlyn acknowledge financial support from the Australian Research Council and the Australian Government Department of Climate Change. We are grateful to Ray Leuning and Steve Zegelin at CSIRO, Australia, for the provision of soil moisture and flux data. We are grateful for support provided by TERACC (NSF Grant No. 0090238) for a modelling workshop held in Cronulla, Sydney, Australia, in 2006.


References


Brun R, Reichert P, Künsch HR (2001) Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 37, 1015–1030.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Calder IR (1992) A model of transpiration and growth of Eucalyptus plantation in water limited conditions. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 130, 1–15. open url image1

Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1989) Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1–5.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Caldwell MM, Dawson TE, Richards JH (1998) Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113, 151–161.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ciais Ph, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J , et al. (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Comins HN, McMurtrie RE (1993) Long-term response of nutrient-limited forests to CO2-enrichment: equilibrium behaviour of plant–soil models. Ecological Applications 3, 666–681.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Corbeels M, McMurtrie RE, Pepper DA, O’Connell AM (2005) A process-based model of nitrogen cycling in forest plantations Part II. Simulating growth and nitrogen mineralisation of Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia. Ecological Modelling 187, 449–474.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

CSIRO and Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2007) ‘Climate change in Australia: technical report 2007.’ (CSIRO: Collingwood)

Davidson NJ, Reid JB (1989) Response of eucalypt species to drought. Australian Journal of Ecology 14, 139–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

DeLucia EH, Drake JE, Thomas RB, Gonzalez-Meler M (2007) Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production? Global Change Biology 13, 1157–1167.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dewar R (1997) A simple model of light and water use evaluated for Pinus radiata. Tree Physiology 17, 259–265.
PubMed |
open url image1

Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE (1998) A mechanistic analysis of light and carbon use efficiencies. Plant, Cell & Environment 21, 573–588.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE (1999) Acclimation of the respiration photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Global Change Biology 5, 615–622.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dye PJ, Jacobs S, Drew D (2004) Verification of 3-PG growth and water-use predictions in twelve Eucalyptus plantation stands in Zululand, South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management 193, 197–218.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Eamus D (2003) How does ecosystem water balance affect net primary productivity of woody ecosystems? Functional Plant Biology 30, 187–205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Eamus D, Hutley LB, O’Grady AP (2001) Daily and seasonal patterns of carbon and water fluxes above a north Australian savanna. Tree Physiology 21, 977–988.
PubMed |
open url image1

Eliasson PE, McMurtrie RE, Pepper DA, Strömgren M, Linder S, Ågren GI (2005) The response of heterotrophic CO2-flux to soil warming. Global Change Biology 11, 167–181.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fitzpatrick EA , Nix HA (1970) The climatic factor in Australian grassland ecology. In ‘Australian Grasslands.’ (Ed. RM Moore) pp. 2–26. (Australian National University Press: Canberra)

Fuchs EE, Livingston NJ (1996) Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] and alder [Alnus rubra (Bong.)] seedlings. Plant, Cell & Environment 19, 1091–1098.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gifford RM (1992) Interaction of carbon dioxide with growth-limiting environmental factors in vegetation productivity: implications for the global carbon cycle. Advances in Bioclimatology 1, 24–58. open url image1

Gifford RM (2003) Plant respiration in productivity models: conceptualisation, representation and issues for global terrestrial carbon-cycle research. Functional Plant Biology 30, 171–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hanson PJ, Amthor JS, Wullschleger SD, Wilson KB, Grant RF , et al. (2004) Oak forest carbon and water simulations: model intercomparisons and evaluations against independent data. Ecological Monographs 74, 443–489.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Honeysett JL, Beadle CL, Turnbull CRA (1992) Evapotranspiration and growth of two contrasting species of eucalypts under non-limiting and limiting water availability. Forest Ecology and Management 50, 203–216.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Honeysett JL, White DA, Worledge D, Beadle CL (1996) Growth and water use of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in irrigated and rainfed plantations. Australian Forestry 59, 64–73. open url image1

Hughes L (2003) Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecology 28, 423–443.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jackson RB, Sperry JS, Dawson TE (2000) Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science 5, 482–488.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Keeling HC, Phillips OL (2007) The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16, 618–631.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kirschbaum MUF, Keith H, Leuning R, Cleugh HA, Jacobsen KL, van Gorsel E, Raison RJ (2007) Modelling net ecosystem carbon and water exchange of a temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis forest using multiple constraints. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 145, 48–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ladiges PY (1974) Variations in drought tolerance in Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. Australian Journal of Botany 22, 489–500.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lavery B, Joung G, Nicholls N (1997) An extended high-quality historical rainfall dataset for Australia. Australian Meteorological Magazine 46, 27–38. open url image1

Leuning R, Cleugh HA, Zegelin SJ, Hughes D (2005) Carbon and water fluxes over temperate Eucalyptus forest and tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 129, 151–173.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Li CY, Wang KY (2003) Differences in drought responses of three contrasting Eucalyptus microtheca F. Muell. populations. Forest Ecology and Management 179, 377–385.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mäkelä A, Valentine HT (2001) The ratio of NPP to GPP: evidence of change over the course of stand development. Tree Physiology 21, 1015–1030.
PubMed |
open url image1

McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89, 67–94.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McMurtrie RE, Rook DA, Kelliher FM (1990) Modelling the yield of Pinus radiata on a site limited by water and nitrogen. Forest Ecology and Management 30, 381–413.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Medlyn BE, Barrett D, Landsberg J, Sands P, Clement R (2003) Conversion of canopy intercepted radiation to photosynthate: review of modelling approaches for regional scales. Functional Plant Biology 30, 153–169.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM, Cavelier J, Wright SJ (1999) Partitioning of soil water among canopy trees in a seasonally dry tropical forest. Oecologia 121, 293–301.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

O’Grady AP, Eamus D, Hutley LB (1999) Transpiration increases during the dry season: patterns of tree water use in eucalypt open-forests of northern Australia. Tree Physiology 19, 591–597.
PubMed |
open url image1

Oren R, Phillips N, Ewers BE, Pataki DE, Megonigal JP (1999) Sap-flux-scaled transpiration responses to light, vapour pressure deficit, and leaf area reduction in a flooded Taxodium distichum forest. Tree Physiology 19, 337–347.
PubMed |
open url image1

Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 1173–1179. open url image1

Pataki DE, Oren R, Phillips N (1998) Responses of sap flux and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda L. to stepwise reductions in leaf area. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 871–878.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pepper DA, Eliasson PE, McMurtrie RE, Corbeels M, Ågren GI, Strömgren M, Linder S (2007) Simulated mechanisms of soil N feedback on the forest CO2 response. Global Change Biology 13, 1265–1281.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pereira JS, Tenhunen JD, Lange OL (1987) Stomatal control of photosynthesis of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. trees under field conditions in Portugal. Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 1678–1688.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pittock B (2003) ‘Climate change: An Australian guide to the science and potential impacts.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra)

Rascher U, Bobich EG, Lin GH, Walter A, Morris T , et al. (2004) Functional diversity of photosynthesis during drought in a model tropical rainforest – the contributions of leaf area, photosynthetic electron transport and stomatal conductance to reduction in net ecosystem carbon exchange. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 1239–1256.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reichert P (2006) A standard interface between simulation programs and systems analysis software. Water Science and Technology 53, 267–275.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 8, 1204–1213.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schulze E-D, Kelliher FM, Körner C, Lloyd J, Leuning R (1994) Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global scaling exercise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25, 629–660.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Thomas DS, Eamus D (1999) The influence of predawn leaf water potential on stomatal responses to atmospheric water content at constant C-i and on stem hydraulic conductance and foliar ABA concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 243–251.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Turnbull MH, Whitehead D, Tissue DT, Schuster WSF, Brown KJ, Griffin KL (2001) Responses of leaf respiration to temperature and leaf characteristics in three deciduous tree species vary with site water availability. Tree Physiology 21, 571–578.
PubMed |
open url image1

van Gorsel E, Leuning R, Cleugh HA, Keith H, Suni T (2007) Nocturnal carbon efflux: reconciliation of eddy covariance and chamber measurements using an alternative to the u*-threshold filtering technique. Tellus 59B, 397–403. open url image1

Waring RH, Landsberg JJ, Williams M (1998) Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiology 18, 129–134.
PubMed |
open url image1

White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D (1996) Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus and E. nitens: seasonal, drought and species effects. Tree Physiology 16, 469–476.
PubMed |
open url image1

White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D, Honeysett JL, Cherry ML (1998) The influence of drought on the relationship between leaf and conducting sapwood area in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Trees (Berlin) 12, 406–414. open url image1

Whitehead D, Beadle CL (2004) Physiological regulation of productivity and water use in Eucalyptus: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 193, 113–140.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zegelin SJ, White I (1989) Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometry. Water Resources Research 25, 2367–2376.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research 37, 701–708.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes WR, Chiew FHS, Western AW, Briggs PR (2004) A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research 40, W02502.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1