Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Noise removal for airborne time domain electromagnetic data based on minimum noise fraction

Yue Li 1 Yang Meng 1 Yiming Lu 1 Lingqun Wang 1 Bin Xie 1 Yuqi Cheng 1 Kaiguang Zhu 1 2
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Key Laboratory of Geo-Exploration Instrumentation, Ministry of Education, College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China.

2 Corresponding author. Email: zhukaiguang@jlu.edu.cn

Exploration Geophysics 49(2) 127-133 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG15072
Submitted: 7 July 2015  Accepted: 27 October 2016   Published: 15 December 2016

Abstract

Residual noise remains in airborne time domain electromagnetic profiles after preprocessing the data, and this noise affects the exploration of targets. An approach to reduce this noise based on the minimum noise fraction has been proposed. The minimum noise fraction uses a rotation matrix to transform noise-contaminated electromagnetic data into the minimum noise fraction components ordered by signal-to-noise ratio. The rotation matrix is formed based on the use of noise covariance estimation and the data covariance. Noise can be effectively removed when we reconstruct the electromagnetic data using the low-order minimum noise fraction components whose signal-to-noise ratios are sufficiently high. In this work, we discuss the de-noising process based on the minimum noise fraction for two earth models and field data from Ontario Airborne Geophysical Surveys over the Nestor Falls area, Canada. Example applications to synthetic and field data are used to demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed method.

Key words: adaptive width filter, airborne electromagnetic, airborne survey, minimum noise fraction, noise covariance.


References

Asten, M.W., 2009, Use of principal component images for classification of the EM response of unexploded ordnance: ASEG Extended Abstracts, 1–6.

Bouchedda, A., Chouteau, M., Keating, P., and Smith, R., 2010, Sferics noise reduction in time-domain electromagnetic systems: application to MegaTEMII signal enhancement: Exploration Geophysics, 41, 225–239
Sferics noise reduction in time-domain electromagnetic systems: application to MegaTEMII signal enhancement:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsFyjt7jL&md5=070f97f78c3917b591a2c60a89600794CAS |

Buselli, G., Pik, J. P., and Hwang, H. S., 1998, AEM noise reduction with remote referencing: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 71–76
AEM noise reduction with remote referencing:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Green, A., 1998, The use of multivariate statistical techniques for the analysis and display of AEM data: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 77–82
The use of multivariate statistical techniques for the analysis and display of AEM data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P., and Craig, M. D., 1988, A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26, 65–74
A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gu, H. Y., Li, H. T., and Yang, J. H., 2007, The remote sensing image fusion method based on minimum noise fraction: Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 19, 53–55

Kass, M. A., and Li, Y. G., 2009, Use of principal component analysis in the de-noising and signal separation of transient electromagnetic data: The 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (ICEEG), 261–267.

Kass, M. A., and Li, Y. G., 2012, Quantitative analysis and interpretation of transient electromagnetic data via principal component analysis: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 1910–1918
Quantitative analysis and interpretation of transient electromagnetic data via principal component analysis:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kass, M. A., Li, Y. G., Krahrnbuhl, R., Nabighian, M., and Oldenburg, D., 2010, Enhancement of TEM data and noise characterization by principal component analysis: Final Report, Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Project MM - 1640.

Lane, R., Plunkett, C., Price, A., Green, A., and Hu, Y, 1998, Streamed data – a source of insight and improvement for time domain airborne EM: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 16–23
Streamed data – a source of insight and improvement for time domain airborne EM:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li, H. T., Gu, H. Y., Zhang, B., and Gao, L. R., 2007, Research on hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on MNF and SVM: Remote Sensing Information, 22, 12–15
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmsFSrt7g%3D&md5=e162deeac6e0ea751b3e27d98ffde981CAS |

Liu, X., Gao, L. R., and Zhang, B., 2008, An improved MNF transform algorithm on hyperspectral images with complex mixing ground objects: International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 479–483.

Macnae, J. C., Lamontagne, Y., and West, G. F., 1984, Noise processing techniques for time-domain EM system: Geophysics, 49, 934–948
Noise processing techniques for time-domain EM system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen, A. A., 2011, Kernel maximum autocorrelation factor and minimum noise fraction transformations: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20, 612–624
Kernel maximum autocorrelation factor and minimum noise fraction transformations:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ridsdill-Smith, T. A., and Dentith, M., 1999, The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing: Geophysics, 64, 1003–1013
The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roger, R. E., 1996, Principal components transform with simple, automatic noise adjustment: International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 2719–2727
Principal components transform with simple, automatic noise adjustment:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stone, G., Clifford, D., Gustafsson, J. O. R., Mccoll, S. R., and Hoffmann, P., 2012, Visualisation in imaging mass spectrometry using the minimum noise fraction transform: BMC Research Notes, 5, 419
Visualisation in imaging mass spectrometry using the minimum noise fraction transform:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Switzer, P., and Green, A. A., 1984, Min/Max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imagery: Technical Report No. 6, April, Stanford University.

Xiao, X. B., Li, X. R., and Zhao, L. Y., 2012, On anomaly detection of hyperspectral image based on minimum noise fraction: Computer Application and Software, 29, 125–128

Xie, B., Wang, L. Q., Lin, J., and Zhu, K. G., 2014, An improved principal component analysis approach to noise removal for airborne electromagnetic data: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 702–705.

Zhu, K. G., Wang, L. Q., Xie, B., Wang, Q., Cheng, Y. Q., and Lin, J., 2013, Research on the noise removal for airborne electromagnetic data based on principal component analysis: Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao, 23, 2430–2435