Practical considerations: making measurements of susceptibility, remanence and Q in the field
Phillip W. Schmidt 1 Mark A. Lackie 2 31 MagneticEarth, PO Box 1855, Macquarie Centre, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
2 Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
3 Corresponding author. Email: mark.lackie@mq.edu.au
Exploration Geophysics 45(4) 305-313 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14019
Submitted: 16 February 2014 Accepted: 8 April 2014 Published: 20 May 2014
Abstract
Here we consider how measurements of magnetic susceptibility, magnetic remanence and Königsberger ratios (Q) can be made in the field. A basic refresher is given on how induced magnetisation differs from remanent magnetisation and what distinguishes multidomain from single domain behaviour of magnetite particles. The approximation of an infinite half-space, which is the usual assumption for using most handheld susceptibility meters, is experimentally investigated and it is found that a block 100 × 100 × 60 mm is the minimum requirement for the meters tested here. The susceptibilities of chips of a dacite, an andesite and a spilite (altered basalt) are also experimentally investigated for a range of chip sizes from a few mm down to 200 μm. The relationship is quite flat until very small grain sizes are reached where the susceptibility either decreases or increases, which is interpreted as an indication of the grain-size fraction where the magnetite resides. Making susceptibility measurements on bags of rock chips is investigated and guidelines given. The temperature of susceptibility meters is also found to be a factor and five meters have been tested for temperatures from 0°C to 50°C, the stated operating range of most meters. Finally Breiner’s method to separate induced magnetisation from remanent magnetisation using a field magnetometer is discussed. A new fluxgate based pendulum instrument to allow a more controlled implementation of Breiner’s method is also described.
Key words: field measurement, Königsberger ratio, magnetic properties, magnetic susceptibility, remanent magnetisation.
References
Breiner, S., 1973, Applications manual for portable magnetometers: Geometrics, p. 58 [Web document]. Available at http://www.alphageofisica.com.br/geometrics/magnetometro/portable_magnetometers.pdfClark, D. A., 1997, Magnetic petrophysics and magnetic petrology: aids to geological interpretation of magnetic surveys: AGSO Journal of Geology & Geophysics, 17, 83–103
| 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXit12luro%3D&md5=5d3163db7542ce631ed20a150b08e4caCAS |
Clark, D. A., 2014, Methods for determining remanent and total magnetisations of magnetic sources: a review: Exploration Geophysics, 45, 271–304
| Methods for determining remanent and total magnetisations of magnetic sources: a review:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvFCisb3L&md5=d0ed73e5fb4ebd864d296a7db516882bCAS |
Dunlop, D. J., 1981, The rock magnetism of fine particles: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 26, 1–26
| The rock magnetism of fine particles:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXltlGqtr8%3D&md5=b4af6c3fcdd8ebbb8543574214dbc171CAS |
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1986, Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing: Cambridge University Press, p. xi (Preface).