Airborne electromagnetic bathymetry investigations in Port Lincoln, South Australia – comparison with an equivalent floating transient electromagnetic system*
Julian VrbancichDefence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), 13 Garden Street, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia. Email: julian.vrbancich@dsto.defence.gov.au
Exploration Geophysics 42(3) 167-175 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG10038
Submitted: 30 November 2010 Accepted: 5 July 2011 Published: 2 September 2011
Abstract
Helicopter time-domain airborne electromagnetic (AEM) methodology is being investigated as a reconnaissance technique for bathymetric mapping in shallow coastal waters, especially in areas affected by water turbidity where light detection and ranging (LIDAR) and hyperspectral techniques may be limited. Previous studies in Port Lincoln, South Australia, used a floating AEM time-domain system to provide an upper limit to the expected bathymetric accuracy based on current technology for AEM systems. The survey lines traced by the towed floating system were also flown with an airborne system using the same transmitter and receiver electronic instrumentation, on two separate occasions. On the second occasion, significant improvements had been made to the instrumentation to reduce the system self-response at early times. A comparison of the interpreted water depths obtained from the airborne and floating systems is presented, showing the degradation in bathymetric accuracy obtained from the airborne data. An empirical data correction method based on modelled and observed EM responses over deep seawater (i.e. a quasi half-space response) at varying survey altitudes, combined with known seawater conductivity measured during the survey, can lead to significant improvements in interpreted water depths and serves as a useful method for checking system calibration. Another empirical data correction method based on observed and modelled EM responses in shallow water was shown to lead to similar improvements in interpreted water depths; however, this procedure is notably inferior to the quasi half-space response because more parameters need to be assumed in order to compute the modelled EM response. A comparison between the results of the two airborne surveys in Port Lincoln shows that uncorrected data obtained from the second airborne survey gives good agreement with known water depths without the need to apply any empirical corrections to the data. This result significantly decreases the data-processing time thereby enabling the AEM method to serve as a rapid reconnaissance technique for bathymetric mapping.
Key words: airborne electromagnetic, altimetry, bathymetry, Port Lincoln.
References
Davis, A. C., Macnae, J., and Robb, T., 2006, Pendulum motion in airborne HEM systems: Exploration Geophysics, 37, 355–362| Pendulum motion in airborne HEM systems:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liu, G., and Becker, A., 1990, Two-dimensional mapping of sea ice keels with airborne electromagnetics: Geophysics, 55, 239–248
| Two-dimensional mapping of sea ice keels with airborne electromagnetics:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, J. E., and Vrbancich, J., 2004, A comparison of the inductive-limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations: Geophysics, 69, 1229–1239
| A comparison of the inductive-limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vrbancich, J., 2009, An investigation of seawater and sediment depth using a prototype airborne electromagnetic instrumentation system – a case study in Broken Bay, Australia: Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 633–651
| An investigation of seawater and sediment depth using a prototype airborne electromagnetic instrumentation system – a case study in Broken Bay, Australia:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vrbancich, J., 2010, Preliminary investigations using a helicopter time-domain system for bathymetric measurements and depth-to-bedrock estimation in shallow coastal waters – a case study in Broken Bay: Oceans’10 IEEE Conference and Exhibition, May 2010, Sydney, Australia.
Vrbancich, J., and Fullagar, P. K., 2007a, Towards remote sensing of sediment thickness and depth to bedrock in shallow seawater using airborne TEM: Exploration Geophysics, 38, 77–88
| Towards remote sensing of sediment thickness and depth to bedrock in shallow seawater using airborne TEM:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vrbancich, J., and Fullagar, P. K., 2007b, Improved seawater depth determination using corrected helicopter time-domain electromagnetic data: Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 407–420
| Improved seawater depth determination using corrected helicopter time-domain electromagnetic data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vrbancich, J., and Smith, R., 2009, Development of a helicopter time domain system for bathymetric mapping and seafloor characterisation in shallow water: Extended Abstract, 20th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Adelaide, 22–25 February 2009.
Vrbancich, J., Fullagar, P., and Smith, R., 2010, Testing the limits of AEM bathymetry with a floating system: Geophysics, 75, WA163–WA177
| Testing the limits of AEM bathymetry with a floating system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vrbancich, J., Lieff, W., and Hacker, J., 2011, Demonstration of two portable scanning LiDAR systems flown at low-altitude for investigating coastal sea surface topography: Remote Sensing, 3, in press.