Inversion of concentric loop electromagnetic data by transformation to an equivalent potential field response
Lachlan Hennessy 1 2 James Macnae 11 RMIT University, School of Applied Sciences, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia.
2 Corresponding author. Email: lachlan.hennessy@student.rmit.edu.au
Exploration Geophysics 41(4) 240-249 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG10022
Submitted: 30 August 2010 Accepted: 27 October 2010 Published: 15 December 2010
Abstract
A novel approach to the inversion of concentric loop electromagnetic (EM) data is through transformation of moving-source EM data to an equivalent fixed-source potential field. This equivalent potential field has been named as the surrogate potential field. The proposed approach then provides for example, efficient target depth estimates through Euler deconvolution. Under the quasi-static approximation, at each instant in the earth, diffuse loops of induced current are the source of the recorded response. Successive samples of the magnetic field of confined current loops can be mathematically manipulated to create a surrogate potential field from an equivalent constant induced current, as the surrogate potential field is proportional to the square root of the concentric loop EM response. Processing includes inspecting data and correcting for the sign ambiguity at suitably stable locations.
Correct surrogate potential field transformation relies on induced current systems being geometrically fixed in location, and as such will be predominantly correct for tabular conductors that are of relatively small size. For these small targets, stitched 1D layered-earth EM inversions often overestimate the depth of a small near-surface body. Unconfined currents induced in conductive overburden introduce a ‘background’ which requires subtraction before transformation to a surrogate potential. Confidence limits on solutions are part of a least-squares regression involving a cluster analysis. These form the basis for evaluation of the reliability with which the proposed method has estimated the target parameters from EM data. Successful estimations of target depth and location have been performed for synthetic horizontal and vertical tabular plate models, and with limitations for compact bodies represented by a spherical conductor. Three case studies illustrate the characteristics of the proposed method, illustrating useful results with limitations arising in field data and its processing.
Key words: airborne, airborne electromagnetic, concentric loop, electromagnetic, Euler deconvolution, inversion.
References
Blakely, R., 1996, Potential Theory in Gravity & Magnetic Applications: Cambridge.Cooper, G., Combrinck, M., and Cowan, D., 2004, The Application of Euler Deconvolution to Airborne EM Data: ASEG Extended Abstracts.
Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics: McGraw-Hill.
Hill, S. M., Thomas, M., Earl, K., and Foster, K. A., 2005, Flying Doctor Ag-Pb-Zn Prospect Northern Leases Broken Hill in M. Cornelius C.R.M. Butt, K.M. Scott and I.D.M. Robertson (ed.) Regolith Expression of Australian Ore Systems: A Compilation of Geochemical Case Histories and Conceptual Models, CRC LEME Monograph, 146–148.
Macnae, J., 1986, A Manual of Large-Loop EM Interpretation: Lamontagne Geophsyics.
Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A., and Blaha, A., 1998, Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 163–169
| Fast AEM data processing and inversion:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald, P., 2008, A VTEM Survey Along the 2006 Central Victorian Seismic Transect: Department of Primary Industries.
Mushayandebvu, M. F., Lesur, V., Reid, A. B., and Fairhead, J. D., 2004, Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures: Geophysics, 69, 489–496
| Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millett, A. J., and Somerton, I. W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80–91
| Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, J., Fitzpatrick, A., and Godber, K., 2010, An overview of the skytem airborne EM system with Australian examples: Preview, 145, 26–37
Roy, A., 1966, Downward continuation and its application to electromagnetic data Interpretation: Geophysics, 31, 167–184
| Downward continuation and its application to electromagnetic data Interpretation:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ugalde, H., and Morris, W. A., 2010, Cluster analysis of Euler deconvolution solutions: new filtering techniques and geologic strike determination: Geophysics, 75, L61–L70
| Cluster analysis of Euler deconvolution solutions: new filtering techniques and geologic strike determination:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolfgram, P., Sattel, D., and Christensen, N. B.,, 2003, Approximate 2D inversion of AEM data: Exploration Geophysics, 34, 29–33
| Approximate 2D inversion of AEM data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolfgram, P., Hyde, M., and Thomson, S.,, 1998, How to find localised conductors in GEOTEM data: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 665–670
| How to find localised conductors in GEOTEM data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |