Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An attempt at soil profiling on a river embankment using geophysical data*

Toru Takahashi 1 3 Tsuyoshi Yamamoto 2
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Fukada Geological Institute, 2-13-12 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0021, Japan.

2 Kinki Regional Development Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Osaka Godochosha, Bldg. No. 1, 1-5-44, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8586, Japan.

3 Corresponding author. Email: takahashi@fgi.or.jp

Exploration Geophysics 41(1) 102-108 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09049
Submitted: 10 September 2009  Accepted: 27 November 2009   Published: 19 February 2010

Abstract

The internal structure of a river embankment must be delineated as part of investigations to evaluate its safety. Geophysical methods can be most effective means for that purpose, if they are used together with geotechnical methods such as the cone penetration test (CPT) and drilling. Since the dyke body and subsoil in general consist of material with a wide range of grain size, the properties and stratification of the soil must be accurately estimated to predict the mechanical stability and water infiltration in the river embankment. The strength and water content of the levee soil are also parameters required for such prediction. These parameters are usually estimated from CPT data, drilled core samples and laboratory tests. In this study we attempt to utilise geophysical data to estimate these parameters more effectively for very long river embankments. S-wave velocity and resistivity of the levee soils obtained with geophysical surveys are used to classify the soils. The classification is based on a physical soil model, called the unconsolidated sand model. Using this model, a soil profile along the river embankment is constructed from S-wave velocity and resistivity profiles. The soil profile thus obtained has been verified by geotechnical logs, which proves its usefulness for investigation of a river embankment.

Key words: geophysical data, resistivity, river embankment, S-wave velocity, soil profiling, unconsolidated sand model.


Acknowledgments

The data used in this study were acquired in the research project ‘Study on geophysical methods and instruments for investigation of river embankments’ by Kinki Technical Office, Kinki Regional Development Bureau, MLIT, being supervised by the Kyoto University River Embankment Research Consortium chaired by Professor Yuzuru Ashida.


References

Asch, T. H., Deszcz-Pan, M., Burton, B., Ball, L., Kress, W., and Vrabel, J., 2008, Geophysical Characterization of a Levee With DC Resistivity and Electromagnetic Measurements: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), 21, 739–748.

Avseth P. , Mukerji T. , and Mavko G. , 2005, Quantitative seismic interpretation: Cambridge University Press.

Dvorkin J. , Mavko G. , and Mukerji T. , 2002, Rock physics reservoir characterization – approaches and methods tutorial: Stanford University.

Groom D. , Yamashita Y. , Konishi C. , and Hayashi K. , 2009, Application of capacitively-coupled resistivity method to site investigation: Proceedings of 8th SEGJ International Symposium.

Hashin, Z., and Shtrikman, S., 1963, A variation approach to the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 11, 127–140.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Inazaki T. , Hayashi K. , Watanabe F. , Matsuo K. , Tokumaru T. , and Imamura S. , 2008, Ground truth verification of an integrated geophysical investigation for the assessment of an earthen levee: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), 21, 731–738.

Marion, D., Nur, A., Yin, H., and Han, D., 1992, Compressional velocity and porosity in sand-clay mixtures: Geophysics 57, 554–563.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mavko G. , Mukerji T. , and Dvorkin J. , 2009, The rock physics handbook, second edition: Cambridge University Press.

Niederleithinger E. , Weller A. , Lewis R. , Stötzner U. , Fechner Th. , Lorenz B. , and Nießen J. , 2008, Evaluation of geophysical methods for river embankment investigation: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium of Flood Defense.

Shibata, T., Mimura, M., Shrivastava, A., and Nobuyama, M., 1992, Moisture measurement by neutron moisture cone penetrometer; Design and application: Soil and Foundation 32, 58–67.
Yamamoto T. , Kodan E. , Itokawa M. , Kyoto University River Embankment Research Consortium, 2008, Study on applicability of geophysical methods and instruments for investigation of river embankment by Kinki Technical Office, MLIT, in the state of the art of applications of geophysical methods, SEG Japan (in Japanese).




* *Part of this paper was presented at the 9th SEGJ International Symposium (2009).