Sferics noise reduction in time-domain electromagnetic systems: application to MegaTEMII signal enhancement
Abderrezak Bouchedda 1 5 Michel Chouteau 1 Pierre Keating 2 Richard Smith 3 41 Departement CG&M, Ecole Polytechnique, CP 6079 succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada.
2 Geological Survey of Canada, 615 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E9, Canada.
3 Fugro Airborne Surveys, 2191 Thurston Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 6C9, Canada.
4 Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada.
5 Corresponding author. Email: bouchedda@geo.polymtl.ca
Exploration Geophysics 41(4) 225-239 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09007
Submitted: 7 February 2009 Accepted: 21 September 2010 Published: 15 December 2010
Abstract
Two noise reduction techniques are proposed for the removal of sferics noise from airborne transient electromagnetic data. Both techniques use multi-resolution analysis via a stationary wavelet transform of the data. The analysed signal is divided into several successive lower resolution components. The transient character of the sferics can be seen as high amplitudes of the wavelet detail coefficients close to the time of the sferics event. The first noise reduction strategy, named the wavelet extraction technique, identifies sferics in the first detail coefficients using an energy detector. The corresponding detail coefficients are set to zero, and the electromagnetic signal is reconstructed by inverse transform. This technique is very robust and successful both for on-time and off-time data and even in the case where several sferics are present. However, when sferics occur near the switch on or the switch off times of the airborne electromagnetic transmitter signal, or if the low frequency components of the spheric are very high, this technique becomes less effective. To overcome this problem, the second strategy, named the wavelet stacking technique, uses the shift invariance and linearity of the stationary wavelet transform to perform data stacking in the wavelet domain. Tests on synthetic data results show that the wavelet stacking technique performs better than the mean and median stacking techniques. The wavelet extraction and median stacking present equivalent performance. On very noisy real data, the wavelet stacking technique makes the detection of weak anomalies more straightforward. After additional smoothing by filtering, wavelet extraction and median stacking can produce similar results to wavelet stacking. However, the amplitude and temporal decay of anomalies can be affected by high residual sferics noise. The wavelet extraction technique has the advantage that it can be used to extract sferics for an audio frequency magnetic-like method to map subsurface conductivity changes. When a large number of sferics are observed, the current practice is to stop data acquisition; these techniques allow data collection to continue.
Key words: electromagnetic noise, MegaTEMII, time domain electromagnetic methods, sferics, wavelet transform.
References
Annan, A. P., 1984, Compensation of towed bird AEM system data for differential transmitter receiver motion: 54th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Explor. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 3, 80–81Bouchedda, A., 2005, MegaTEMII data processing: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Master thesis (in French).
Buselli, G., and Cameron, M., 1996, Robust statistical methods for reducing sferics noise contaminating transient electromagnetic measurement: Geophysics, 61, 1633–1646
| Robust statistical methods for reducing sferics noise contaminating transient electromagnetic measurement:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buselli, G., Hwang, H. S., and Pik, J. P., 1998, AEM noise reduction with remote referencing: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 71–76
| AEM noise reduction with remote referencing:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chassande-Mottin, E., Auger, F., and Flandrin, P., 2003, Time-Frequency/Time-Scale Reassignment, in Wavelets and Signal Processing: Birkhäuser, pp. 233–257.
Cheng, L. Z., Smith, R. S., Allard, M., Keating, P., Chouteau, M., Lemieux, J., Vallée, M. A., Bois, D., and Fountain, D. K., 2007, Geophysical case study of the Gallen deposit, Québec, Canada: Exploration and Mining Geology, 16, 67–81
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1Krs7vN&md5=0ec6f31574953ff304d2a13c6afbdcfaCAS |
Daubechies, I., 1992, Ten lectures in wavelets: SIAM, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics.
Donoho, D. L., and Johnstone, I. M., 1994, Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage: Biometrica, 81, 425–455
| Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fugro Airborne Surveys, 2004, Logistics and processing report airborne magnetic and MegaTEM test over Iso-New Insco, Gallen and Aldermac deposit near Val d’Or, Quebec: Fugro Airborne Surveys Report for UQAT, Noranda and Fugro Airborne Surveys.
Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C., Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C., Sattel, D., and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162–172
| An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leblanc, G. E., and Morris, W. A., 2001, Denoising of aeromagnetic data via wavelet transform: Geophysics, 66, 1793–1804
| Denoising of aeromagnetic data via wavelet transform:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Macnae, J. C., Lamontagne, Y., and West, G. F., 1984, Noise processing techniques for time-domain EM system: Geophysics, 49, 934–948
| Noise processing techniques for time-domain EM system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mallat, S., 1999, Wavelet tour of signal processing: Academic Press.
Mallat, S., and Hwang, W. L., 1992, Singularity detection and processing with wavelets: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38, 617–643
| Singularity detection and processing with wavelets:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCracken, K. G., Pik, J. P., and Harris, R. W., 1984, Noise in EM exploration systems: Exploration Geophysics, 15, 169–174
| Noise in EM exploration systems:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Misiti, M., Misiti, Y., Oppenheim, G., and Poggi, J. M., 2007, Matlab Wavelet Toolbox (Version 4.0): Tutorial and Reference Guide: The Mathworks, Natick.
Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C., 2007, Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 4th edn: Wiley.
Munkholm, M. S., 1997, Motion-induced noise from vibration of moving TEM detector coil: characterisation and suppression: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 37, 21–29
| Motion-induced noise from vibration of moving TEM detector coil: characterisation and suppression:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palacky, G. F., and West, J. F., 1991, Airborne electromagnetic methods, in M. N Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic Methods in applied geophysics: Vol. 2, Applications, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Investigations Geophysics, 3, pp. 811–879.
Ravier, P., and Amblard, P.-O., 2001, Wavelet packets and de-noising based on higher-order-statistics for transient detection: Signal Processing, 81, 1909–1926
| Wavelet packets and de-noising based on higher-order-statistics for transient detection:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ridsdill-Smith, T. A., and Dentith, M. C., 1999, The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing: Geophysics, 64, 1003–1013
| The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, R., Fountain, D., and Allard, M., 2003, The MegaTEM fixed-wing transient EM system applied to mineral exploration: a discovery case history: First Break, 21, 73–77
Ward, S. H., 1967, The electromagnetic method: Mining Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysics, 2, 250–253
Ward, S. H., 1959, AFMAG – airborne and ground: Geophysics, 24, 761–789
| AFMAG – airborne and ground:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |