Tuning Coordination Environments Through Ligand Redox Chemistry: the Thiol–Disulfide Reaction
Edwin C. Constable A , Catherine E. Housecroft A B , Markus Neuburger A , Jason R. Price A and Jennifer A. Zampese AA Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 51, CH–4056 Basel, Switzerland.
B Corresponding author. Email: catherine.housecroft@unibas.ch
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(9) 1334-1341 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH10105
Submitted: 3 March 2010 Accepted: 19 May 2010 Published: 9 September 2010
Abstract
Oxidative coupling of 6-(pyridin-2-yl)pyridine-2(1H)-thione yields 1,2-bis(2,2′-bipyridin-6-yl)disulfide (4), which can act as a bis(chelate) to a single zinc(ii) centre. The effects on the solid-state structure of introducing a methyl substituent into each 6-position of 4 have been examined. Ligand 4 functions as a bridging ligand in [Cu2(μ-4)(μ-6)]4+ in which ligand 6 is 1,2-bis(2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridin-4′-yl)disulfide; [Cu2(μ-4)(μ-6)]4+ self-assembles from the components according to the preference shown by copper(ii) for a five-coordinate {Cu(bpy)(tpy)} environment. Reaction of 4 with [Cu(NCMe)4][PF6] leads to a product, tentatively formulated as {[Cu(4)][PF6]}n, which, in air, undergoes oxidation of both copper and ligand to yield [Cu(5)2] (H5 = 2,2′-bipyridine-6-sulfonic acid), the solid state structure of which is presented.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation and the University of Basel for financial support.
[1]
V. Chaurin,
E. C. Constable,
C. E. Housecroft,
New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 1740.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |