New Highly Selective Colorimetric and Fluorescent Chemodosimeters for Mercury Ion
Chen-Yu Wu A , Chiung-Cheng Lin A , Tung-Ming Fu A , Chi-Rei Yang B and Yao-Pin Yen A CA Department of Applied Chemistry, Providence University, Taiwan.
B Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
C Corresponding author. Email: ypyen@pu.edu.tw
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 329-335 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09431
Submitted: 10 August 2009 Accepted: 17 September 2009 Published: 26 February 2010
Abstract
Three new chemodosimeters 1–3 were prepared, and their chromogenic and fluorogenic behaviours toward various metal cations were investigated. Receptors 1–3 show an exclusive response toward Hg2+ and also distinguish Hg2+ from other metal cations by different colour changes in aqueous DMSO solution. Among them, receptor 1 also exhibits a pronounced Hg2+-induced fluorescence enhancement. Therefore, the receptor 1 can be used as a colorimetric and fluorescent chemodosimeter for the determination of Hg2+ ion.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financial support (NSC-98–2119-M-126–001-MY2).
[1]
(b) A. P. de Silva,
D. B. Fox,
A. J. M. Huxley,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
For more information, see the supporting information.