An Investigation into the Potential of SarAr for Use in 64Cu Radioimmunotherapy
Nadine Di Bartolo A B , Suzanne V. Smith A D , Eric Hetherington A and Alan Sargeson B CA Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia.
B Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
C Deceased.
D Corresponding author. Email: svs@ansto.gov.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(10) 1261-1270 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09369
Submitted: 30 June 2009 Accepted: 13 August 2009 Published: 13 October 2009
Abstract
The B72.3 monoclonal antibody was radiolabelled with 123I, and with 111In and 64Cu, using DTPA and SarAr, respectively. Their biodistribution in tumour-bearing nude mice was used to calculate the dosimetry of their respective therapeutic analogue, using 131I, 90Y, 67Cu, and 64Cu. Two dosimetry models were used: one using the classical approach and a second model that takes into consideration the chemical stability of the radiolabelling methods employed and the biological clearance of each radioimmunoconjugate. Results clearly show that the 64Cu-SarAr-B72.3 could be used as a therapeutic agent and, theoretically, be at least as effective as any of the other therapeutic radionuclides currently studied, such as 131I, 90Y, and 67Cu.
Acknowledgements
Alan was my teacher, my mentor, my colleague and my very dear friend. A genuine person who lived and represented for me the best that a scientist and human could offer their communities; demonstrating qualities that we all recognise in various leaders but rarely capture in one individual.
[1]
R. F. Service,
Science 2004, 303, 1796.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]