Structures and Suzuki-Coupling of N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes of PdII with Coordinated Solvent and PPh3
Swee Kuan Yen A , Lip Lin Koh A , Han Vinh Huynh A and T. S. Andy Hor A BA Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, 117543, Singapore.
B Corresponding author. Email: andyhor@nus.edu.sg
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(9) 1047-1053 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09196
Submitted: 7 April 2009 Accepted: 25 May 2009 Published: 17 September 2009
Abstract
A series of mononuclear N,N-heterocyclic carbene (NNHC) complexes of PdII with mixed ligands of 1,3-dibenzylbenzimidazoly-2-ylidene and solvate (dimethyl sulfoxide, CH3CN, N,N-dimethylformamide, and pyridine) or PPh3 were prepared and characterized by X-ray single-crystal diffraction analysis. They are more active in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of selected aryl bromides than their N,S-heterocyclic carbene (NSHC) analogues.
* PEPPSI = Pyridine-enhanced Precatalyst, Preparation, Stabilization, and Initiation catalyst with N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene (IPr) ligand. This commercially available catalyst has been developed as an air-stable catalyst to promote cross-coupling reactions. See Ref. [2].
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the National University of Singapore (NUS), Ministry of Education (R-143-000-361-112) and Agency for Science, Technology and Research (R-143-000-364-305) for financial support as well as the staff at the CMMAC of NUS for technical assistance. S.K.Y. acknowledges NUS for the research scholarship and K. E. Neo for discussion.
[1]
(a) F. E. Hahn,
M. C. Jahnke,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3122.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[11]
[12]
[13]