Anhydrous Poly(2,5-benzimidazole)–Poly(vinylphosphonic Acid) Acid–Base Polymer Blends: a Detailed Solid-State NMR Investigation
Ümit Akbey A , Robert Graf A , Peter P. Chu B and Hans Wolfgang Spiess A CA Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
B Department of Chemistry, National Central University, Taiwan.
C Corresponding author. Email: spiess@mpip-mainz.mpg.de
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(8) 848-856 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09066
Submitted: 2 February 2009 Accepted: 25 March 2009 Published: 13 August 2009
Abstract
The present study aims at understanding the molecular structure and dynamics of the acidic polymer poly(vinylphosphonic acid) (PVPA) blended with the basic polymer poly(2,5-benzimidazole) (ABPBI) under anhydrous conditions. The extent of the acid–base complexation is probed at different mixing ratios. Advanced 1H, 13C, and 31P solid-state NMR methods are used to investigate the structural features in these systems. In addition, molecular dynamics is studied by variable-temperature 1H magic angle spinning and one-dimensional double-quantum NMR methods. Many different types of hydrogen-bonding are identified in the acid–base complexes. Addition of the acidic PVPA to the basic ABPBI changes the molecular packing arrangements of the ABPBI moieties with hydrogen-bond formation as the driving force. The complex with a 1:1 mixing ratio has the lowest activation energy for proton mobility, and at the same time contains the most structured hydrogen-bonded protons. The results show that molecular-level mixing is achieved for the complexes.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Sivakumar Sekharan and Dr Daniel Sebastiani for their support on quantum chemical calculations of the ABPBI monomer. Financial support is acknowledged from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (project DryD under contract no. 0329567).
[1]
K. D. Kreuer,
S. J. Paddison,
E. Spohr,
M. Schuster,
Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4637.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |