Efficient Synthesis of Dendritic Architectures by One-Pot Double Click Reactions
Xing Quan Xiong AA College of Materials Science & Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China. Email: xxqluli@hqu.edu.cn
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(10) 1371-1377 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09052
Submitted: 24 January 2009 Accepted: 5 March 2009 Published: 13 October 2009
Abstract
Dendritic macromolecules with 8 and 16 hydroxy end-groups on the periphery have been synthesized using double click reactions (Cu-catalyzed azide/alkyne click chemistry, i.e., CuAAC and Diels–Alder [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions) with a one-pot technique. The structure of the dendrimers was characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and matrix-assisted laser desorpton–ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The purity was determined by size exclusion chromatography.
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the Special Foundation for Young Scientists of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2008F3067) and the Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Huaqiao University, China (Grant No. 08BS213) are greatly acknowledged. The author is grateful to Professor Yongming Chen at CAS for his useful discussions in this work and for help with GPC and NMR characterization.
[1]
F. Vögtle,
S. Gestermann,
R. Hesse,
H. Schwierz,
B. Windisch,
Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 987.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |